Evaluation of the Digital Twin Concept in the Construction Industry with SWOT Analysis within the Scope of the Building Life Cycle

Öz

Technological developments affect and transform the construction industry as well as many other sectors. Today, digital twin technology, which also makes positive contributions to the construction industry, has the potential to transform the industry in the future. In addition to the contributions of digitalization, there are also points that limit the industry. The aim of this study is, to take attention to the digital twin technologies in the construction industry and to reveal the opportunities and threats in the building lifecycle stages. a SWOT analysis was conducted based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature. As a result of the study, the concept of digital twin in the construction industry has been revealed that it offers a holistic perspective to building life cycles and contributes to sustainability and efficiency issues. In addition, it is foreseen that it will provide a holistic perspective between digitalization and all processes of the international level, intersectoral, and building life cycle. It is aimed that the findings of the study will contribute to the future research in this field and to the construction industry experts in practical studies in the field of digital twin technology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• construction industry
• digital twin
• building lifecycle
• technology

Yapım Sektöründe Dijital İkiz Kavramının Yapı Yaşam Döngüsü Kapsamında SWOT Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Her geçen gün meydana gelen teknolojik gelişmeler pek çok sektörü olduğu gibi yapım sektörünü de etkilemekte ve dönüştürmektedir. Günümüzde yapım sektörüne de olumlu katkılar sağlayan dijital ikiz teknolojisi, gelecekte sektörü de dönüştürme potansiyeline sahiptir. Ancak günümüzde dijitalleşmenin katkılarının yanı sıra dijital ikiz teknolojisinin henüz yetersiz kaldığı ve sektörü sınırlandırdığı noktalar da bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı yapım sektöründe uygulanan dijital ikiz teknolojilerine dikkati çekmek ve yapı yaşam döngüsü aşamalarındaki mevcut durumunu, potansiyellerini ve eksik yönlerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla çalışma kapsamında detaylı literatür araştırması ile elde edilen akademik çalışmalar incelenerek SWOT analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda yapım sektöründe dijital ikiz kavramının yapı yaşam döngülerine bütüncül bakış açısı sunduğu, sürdürülebilirlik ve verimlilik konularına da katkı sağladığı ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca dijitalleşme ile uluslararası düzeyde, sektörler arası ve yapı yaşam döngüsünün tüm süreçleri arasında bütüncül bir bakış açısı sağlayacağı öngörülmektedir. Çalışmanın elde edilen bulgularının gelecekte bu alanda yapılacak bilimsel çalışmalara ve dijital ikiz teknolojisi alanındaki pratik çalışmalarda yapım sektörü uzmanlarına katkı sağlaması hedeflenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapım sektörü
• Dijital ikiz
• Yapı yaşam döngüsü
• Teknoloji

Kaynakça

1. Agarwal, R., Chandrasekaran, S., & Sridhar, M. 2016. Imagining Construction’s Digital Future. McKinsey & Company. 24(06)
2. Agyekum, E. B., Amjad, F., Mohsin, M., & Ansah, M. N. S. (2021). A bird's eye view of Ghana's renewable energy sector environment: a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach. Utilities Policy, 70, 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101219
3. Akanmu, A. A., Anumba, C. J., & Ogunseiju, O. O. 2021. Towards Next Generation Cyber-Physical Systems and Digital Twins for Construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 26(27), 505-525. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.027
4. Aktan, C. C. 1999. 2000'li Yıllarda Yeni Yönetim Teknikleri 2 (Stratejik Yönetim). Simge Ofis Matbaacılık.
5. Alonso, R., Locci, R., & Recupero, D. R. 2024. Improving digital twin experience through big data, IoT and social analysis: An architecture and a case study. Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24741
6. Alshammari, K., Beach, T., & Rezgui, Y. 2021. Cybersecurity for Digital Twins in the Built Environment: Current Research and Future Directions. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 159-173. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.010
7. Ammar, A., Nassereddine, H., Abdulbaky, N., Aboukansour, A., Tannoury, J., Urban, H., & Schranz, C. 2022. Digital Twins in the Construction İndustry: A Perspective of Practitioners and Building Authority. Frontiers in Built Environment, 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.834671
8. Anderl, R., Haag, S., Schützer, K., & Zancul, E. 2018. Digital Twin Technology–An Approach for Industrie 4.0 Vertical and Horizontal Lifecycle Integration. it-Information Technology, 60(3), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2017-0038

9. Angjeliu, G., Coronelli, D., & Cardani, G. 2020. Development of the Simulation Model for Digital Twin Applications in Historical Masonry Buildings: The Integration Between Numerical and Experimental Reality. Computers & Structures, 238, 106282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106282
10. Antwi-Afari, P., Ng, S. T., & Hossain, M. U. 2021. A Review of the Circularity Gap in the Construction Industry Through Scientometric Analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 298, 126870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126870
11. Arslan, G., Kıvrak, S., & Şenel, H. G. 2019. İnşaat Projeleri Kalite Kontrolünde Nokta Bulut Gösteriminin Kullanımı ve Artırılmış Gerçeklik Teknolojisinin Uygulanması. TÜBİTAK projesi https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385916
12. Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M., Keivani, A., Moehler, R. C., Jelodari, N., & Roshdi Laleh, S. 2022. Internet of Things (IoT), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Digital Twin (DT) in Construction Industry: A Review, Bibliometric, and Network Analysis. Buildings, 12(10), 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101503
13. Borth, M., Verriet, J., & Muller, G. 2019. Digital Twin Strategies for Sos 4 Challenges And 4 Architecture Setups for Digital Twins of Sos. In 2019 14th annual conference system of systems engineering (SoSE) (pp. 164-169). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753860
14. Broo, D. G., & Schooling, J. 2021. Digital Twins in Infrastructure: Definitions, Current Practices, Challenges and Strategies. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-10.
15. Canedo, A. 2016. Industrial IoT Lifecycle via Digital Twins. In Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (pp. 1-1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2968456.2974007
16. Ceylan, E. Z. 2019. Dijital İkizler ve İnşaat Sektöründeki Yeri. Yapı Bilgi Modelleme, 1(2), 53-61.
17. Chacón, R., Posada, H., Ramonell, C., Jungmann, M., Hartmann, T., Khan, R., & Tomar, R. 2024. Digital twinning of building construction processes. Case study: A reinforced concrete cast-in structure. Journal of Building Engineering, 84, 108522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108522
18. Chowdhury, T., Adafin, J., & Wilkinson, S. 2019. Review Of Digital Technologies To İmprove Productivity of New Zealand Construction İndustry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 24, 569-587. https://doi.org/10.36680//j.itcon.2019.032
19. Coupry, C., Noblecourt, S., Richard, P., Baudry, D., & Bigaud, D. 2021. BIM-Based Digital Twin and XR Devices to Improve Maintenance Procedures in Smart Buildings: A Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156810
20. Delgado, J. M., Guimarães, A. S., Poças Martins, J., Parracho, D. F., Freitas, S. S., Lima, A. G., & Rodrigues, L. 2023. BIM and BEM Interoperability–Evaluation of a Case Study in Modular Wooden Housing. Energies, 16(4), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041579
21. Dubas, S., & Pasławski, J. 2017. The Concept of Improving Communication in BIM During Transfer to Operation Phase on The Polish Market. Procedia engineering, 208, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.015
22. Gabor, T., Belzner, L., Kiermeier, M., Beck, M. T., & Neitz, A. 2016. A Simulation-Based Architecture for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems. In 2016 IEEE international conference on autonomic computing (ICAC) (pp. 374-379). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2016.29
23. Geçim, G. 2018. Yapı Yaşam Döngüsünde Sürdürülebilir Yapı Değerlendirme Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırılması, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 152s , İstanbul.
24. Gürlek, B. T. 2002. SWOT Analizi. Gebze: Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK).
25. Harode, A., Thabet, W., & Dongre, P. 2023. A tool-based system architecture for a digital twin: a case study in a healthcare facility. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.006
26. Hu, W., Lim, K.Y.H., Cai, Y. 2022. Digital Twin and Industry 4.0 Enablers in Building and Construction: A Survey. Buildings, 12 (11), 2004 https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12112004
27. Ilhan, B., & Yaman, H. 2016. Green Building Assessment Tool (GBAT) For Integrated BIM-Based Design Decisions. Automation in Construction, 70, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.001
28. İçten, T., & Güngör, B. A. L. 2017. Artırılmış Gerçeklik Üzerine Son Gelişmelerin ve Uygulamaların İncelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, 5(2), 111-136.
29. Jiang, Y., Li, M., Li, M., Liu, X., Zhong, R. Y., Pan, W., & Huang, G. Q. 2022. Digital Twin-Enabled Real-Time Synchronization for Planning, Scheduling, and Execution in Precast On-Site Assembly. Automation in Construction, 141, 104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104397 Kaewunruen, S., & Lian, Q. 2019. Digital Twin Aided Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Railway Turnout Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1537-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.156
30. Kaewunruen, S., Sresakoolchai, J., Ma, W., & Phil-Ebosie, O. 2021. Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions. Sustainability, 13(4), 2051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042051
31. Kang, K., Besklubova, S., Dai, Y., & Zhong, R. Y. 2022. Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: A case study in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 143, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.027
32. Kumaş, E., & Erol, S. 2021. Endüstri 4.0’da Anahtar Teknoloji Olarak Dijital İkizler. Politeknik Dergisi, 24(2), 691-701.
33. Lennartsson, M., Yitmen, I., Movaffaghi, H., & Linderoth, H. 2020. Framework for Digital Development in Industrialized Housebuilding. In 9th Swedish Production Symposium (SPS2020), 7-8 October 2020, Jönköping, Sweden (Vol. 13, pp. 335-345). IOS Press.
34. Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. 2021. Review of Digital Twin About Concepts, Technologies, And İndustrial Applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017
35. Lu, R., & Brilakis, I. 2019. Digital Twinning of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges from Labelled Point Clusters. Automation in Construction, 105, 102837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837
36. Madakam, S., Lake, V., Lake, V., & Lake, V. 2015. Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3(05), 164. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2015.35021
37. Madni, A. M., Madni, C. C., & Lucero, S. D. 2019. Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Systems, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007
38. Madubuike, O. C., Anumba, C. J., & Khallaf, R. 2022. A Review of Digital Twin Applications in Construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 27(8), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.008
39. Momeni, M., Relefors, J., Khatry, A., Pettersson, L., Papadopoulos, A. V., & Nolte, T. 2022. Automated Fabrication Of Reinforcement Cages Using a Robotized Production Cell. Automation in Construction, 133, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103990
40. Ni, Z., Liu, Y., Karlsson, M., & Gong, S. 2022. Enabling preventive conservation of historic buildings through cloud-based digital twins: A case study in the city theatre, norrköping. IEEE Access, 10, 90924-90939. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202181
41. Opoku, D. G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. 2021. Digital Twin Application in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Journal of Building Engineering, 40 (2021), 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726
42. Opoku, D. G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., Rashidi, M., Bamdad, K., & Famakinwa, T. 2024. Digital twin for indoor condition monitoring in living labs: University library case study. Automation in Construction, 157, 105188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105188
43. Peng, Y., Zhang, M., Yu, F., Xu, J., & Gao, S. 2020. Digital Twin Hospital Buildings: An Exemplary Case Study Through Continuous Lifecycle Integration. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8846667
44. Porter, M. E., & Michael; ilustraciones Gibbs. (2001). Strategy and the Internet.
45. Qi, Q., & Tao, F. 2018. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. Ieee Access, 6, 3585-3593. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265
46. Qian, Y., Leng, J., Zhou, K., & Liu, Y. 2024. How to measure and control indoor air quality based on intelligent digital twin platforms: A case study in China. Building and Environment, 253, 111349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111349
47. Qiuchen Lu, V., Parlikad, A. K., Woodall, P., Ranasinghe, G. D., & Heaton, J. 2019. Developing a dynamic digital twin at a building level: Using Cambridge campus as case study. In International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) Driving data-informed decision-making (pp. 67-75). ICE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1680/icsic.64669.067
48. Rao, A. S., Radanovic, M., Liu, Y., Hu, S., Fang, Y., Khoshelham, K., Palaniswami, M. & Ngo, T. 2022. Real-Time Monitoring of Construction Sites: Sensors, Methods, and Applications. Automation in Construction, 136, 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104099
49. Rokooei, S. 2015. Building İnformation Modeling in Project Management: Necessities, Challenges and Outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.332
50. Romanovich, M., Kuzmenkova, M., Breskich, V., & Kulakov, K. 2021. Using the Laser Scanning Method in the Reconstruction of Metro Stations. Transportation Research Procedia, 54, 819-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.135
51. Sandberg, A. B., Klementsen, E., Muller, G., De Andres, A., & Maillet, J. (2016). Critical factors influencing viability of wave energy converters in off-grid luxury resorts and small utilities. Sustainability, 8(12), 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121274
52. Schluse, M., & Rossmann, J. 2016. From Simulation to Experimentable Digital Twins: Simulation-Based Development and Operation of Complex Technical Systems. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753162
53. Sepasgozar, S. M. 2021. Differentiating Digital Twin from Digital Shadow: Elucidating a Paradigm Shift to Expedite a Smart, Sustainable Built Environment. Buildings, 11(4), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040151
54. Shim, C. S., Dang, N. S., Lon, S., & Jeon, C. H. 2019. Development of a Bridge Maintenance System for Prestressed Concrete Bridges Using 3D Digital Twin Model. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(10), 1319-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789
55. Sivori, D., Ierimonti, L., Venanzi, I., Ubertini, F., & Cattari, S. 2023. An equivalent frame digital twin for the seismic monitoring of historic structures: a case study on the Consoli palace in Gubbio, Italy. Buildings, 13(7), 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071840
56. Tan, J., Leng, J., Zeng, X., Feng, D., & Yu, P. 2022. Digital twin for Xiegong’s architectural archaeological research: A case study of Xuanluo Hall, Sichuan, China. Buildings, 12(7), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12071053
57. Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., Guo, Z., Lu, S. C.-Yu. & Nee, A. Y. 2019. Digital Twin-Driven Product Design Framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935-3953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229
58. Teicholz, P. (Ed.). 2013. BIM for Facility Managers. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119572633
59. Tran, H., Nguyen, T. N., Christopher, P., Bui, D. K., Khoshelham, K., & Ngo, T. D. 2021. A Digital Twin Approach for Geometric Quality Assessment of As-Built Prefabricated Façades. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102377
60. Wang, H., Qian, Y., Kuang, Y., Leng, J., Yang, Y., & Zhang, H. 2024. How occupant positioning systems can be applied to help historic residences manage energy consumption: A case study in China. Building and Environment, 249, 111110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111110
61. Wei, Y., Lei, Z., & Altaf, S. 2022. An off-site construction digital twin assessment framework using wood panelized construction as a case study. Buildings, 12(5), 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050566
62. Xie, H., Xin, M., Lu, C., & Xu, J. 2022. Knowledge Map and Forecast of Digital Twin in the Construction Industry: State-of-the-Art Review Using Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135231
63. Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., & Wang, H. 2021. Digital-Twin-Based Evaluation of Nearly Zero-Energy Building for Existing Buildings Based on Scan-to-BIM. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638897