Endüstriyel Sektörlerden Kaynaklanan Atıkların Sürdürülebilirlik Açısından Geri Dönüşüme Katkısının Araştırılması: Bulanık MCDM Tabanlı Bir Yaklaşım

Öz

Kentsel nüfus artışı ve ekonomik büyüme ile birlikte artan tüketim, doğal kaynakların hızla tükenmesine neden olmaktadır. Kaynakların sınırlı olması, geri dönüşümü etkin bir atık yönetimi stratejisinin vazgeçilmez unsuru haline getirmektedir. Etkin bir atık yönetimi; ekonomik, çevresel, teknik ve sosyal boyutlarıyla, farklı paydaşların iş birliği çerçevesinde çok boyutlu olarak ele alınmalıdır. Bu bağlamda, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemleri, bu tür karmaşık sistemlerin eşzamanlı değerlendirilmesinde başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, endüstriyel sektörleri sürdürülebilir geri dönüşüm sürecine yapacakları katkılara göre sıralamaktır. Bu kapsamda entegre bir ÇKKV yaklaşımı benimsenmiştir: kriterlerin önem dereceleri Bulanık Entropi yöntemiyle belirlenmiş, sektörlerin performans değerlendirmesi Bulanık EDAS yöntemiyle yapılmış ve nihai sıralama TOPSIS yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Bulgular, sürdürülebilir tedarik, işlem maliyeti, enerji kullanımı, ürün kârlılığı, geri dönüşüm oranı ve su tüketiminin sürdürülebilir atık yönetiminde öne çıkan kriterler olduğunu göstermektedir. Endüstriyel atık türleri arasında metal, kâğıt, plastik ve tekstil en etkili bileşenler olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, petrol rafinerileri, kauçuk ve plastik, kimya, tekstil ve matbaa sektörleri, sürdürülebilirlik açısından öncelikli sektörler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışma, sürdürülebilir atık yönetimi alanında politika yapıcılara, yeşil finans uygulamalarına ve geri dönüşüm yatırımlarına yol gösterici nitelikte bulgular sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Endüstriyel atık
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Geri dönüşüm
• ÇKKV

Investigating the Contribution of Waste from Industrial Sectors to Recycling in Terms of Sustainability: A Fuzzy MCDM Based Approach

Öz

Urban population growth and economic expansion have led to a significant increase in consumption, thereby accelerating the depletion of natural resources. The scarcity of these resources makes recycling an indispensable component of effective waste management. An efficient waste management strategy should be addressed in a multidimensional framework economic, environmental, technical, and social while considering the cooperation of various stakeholders. In this context, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods have been widely applied for the simultaneous analysis of such complex systems. The primary objective of this study is to rank industrial sectors according to their contribution to the sustainable recycling process. For this purpose, an integrated MCDM approach is adopted: the importance weights of the evaluation criteria are determined through Fuzzy Entropy, while the sectoral performances are assessed using the Fuzzy EDAS method, and a comprehensive ranking is obtained via the TOPSIS technique. The findings highlight that sustainable supply, processing costs, energy consumption, product profitability, recycling rate, and water usage are the most critical criteria in sustainable waste management. Among industrial waste types, metals, paper, plastics, and textiles are identified as the most influential in recycling. Furthermore, the petroleum refining, rubber and plastics, chemicals, textiles, and printing industries emerge as the leading sectors in terms of sustainability contributions. This study provides systematic insights into sustainable waste management and serves as a guide for environmental policies, green financing practices, and recycling investments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Industrial waste
• Sustainability
• recycle
• MCDM

Kaynakça

1. [1] Mandpe A., Paliya S., Gedam V., Patel S., Tyagi L. and Kumar S., “Circular economy approach for sustainable solid waste management: A developing economy perspective”, Waste Management & Research, 41: 499–511, (2023).
2. [2] Ragasri S. and Sabumon P. C., “A critical review on slaughterhouse waste management and framing sustainable practices in managing slaughterhouse waste in India”, Journal of Environmental Management, 327: 116823, (2023).
3. [3] Turcott Cervantes D. E., López Martínez A., Cuartas Hernández M. and Lobo García de Cortázar A., “Using indicators as a tool to evaluate municipal solid waste management: A critical review”, Waste Management, 80: 51–63, (2018).
4. [4] Sohail S. S., Javed Z., Nadeem M., Anwer F., Farhat F., Hussain A., et al., “Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis”, Heliyon, 9: e21261, (2023).
5. [5] Sarkkinen M., Kujala K. and Gehör S., “Decision support framework for solid waste management based on sustainability criteria: A case study of tailings pond cover systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 236: 117583, (2019).
6. [6] Zurbrügg C., Caniato M. and Vaccari M., “How assessment methods can support solid waste management in developing countries—A critical review”, Sustainability, 6: 545–570, (2014).
7. [7] Marshall R. E. and Farahbakhsh K., “Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries”, Waste Management, 33: 988–1003, (2013).
8. [8] Ayaz Arda Ö. and Aslan T., “Çevre Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Örgütsel Performansla İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Çevresel Proaktifliğin Aracılık Etkisi”, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 3: 3582–3614, (2020).

9. [9] Torkayesh A. E., Rajaeifar M. A., Rostom M., Malmir B., Yazdani M., Suh S., et al., “Integrating life cycle assessment and multi criteria decision making for sustainable waste management: Key issues and recommendations for future studies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168: 112819, (2022).
10. [10] Zhang Z., Malik M. Z., Khan A., Ali N., Malik S. and Bilal M., “Environmental impacts of hazardous waste, and management strategies to reconcile circular economy and eco-sustainability”, Science of The Total Environment, 807: 150856, (2022).
11. [11] Gutierrez-Lopez J., McGarvey R. G., Costello C. and Hall D. M., “Decision support frameworks in solid waste management: A systematic review of multi-criteria decision-making with sustainability and social indicators”, Sustainability, 15: 13316, (2023).
12. [12] Zaman A. U., “Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems”, Ecological Indicators, 36: 682–693, (2014).
13. [13] Achillas C., Moussiopoulos N., Karagiannidis A., Banias G. and Perkoulidis G., “The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: A literature review”, Waste Management & Research, 31: 115–129, (2013).
14. [14] Desmond M., “Municipal solid waste management in Ireland: Assessing for sustainability”, Irish Geography, 39: 22–33, (2006).
15. [15] Marinello S. and Gamberini R., “Multi-criteria decision making approaches applied to waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): A comprehensive literature review”, Toxics, 9: 13, (2021).
16. [16] Sudibyo H., Majid A. I., Pradana Y. S., Budhijanto W., Deendarlianto and Budiman A., “Technological evaluation of municipal solid waste management system in Indonesia”, Energy Procedia, 105: 263–269, (2017).
17. [17] Khoshand A., Rahimi K., Ehteshami M. and Gharaei S., “Fuzzy AHP approach for prioritizing electronic waste management options: A case study of Tehran, Iran”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 9649–9660, (2019).
18. [18] Sanjeevi V. and Shahabudeen P., “Development of performance indicators for municipal solid waste management (PIMS): A review”, Waste Management & Research, 33: 1052–1065, (2015).
19. [19] Stefanović G., Milutinović B., Vučićević B., Denčić-Mihajlov K. and Turanjanin V., “A comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analysis and Synthesis of Parameters under Information Deficiency method for assessing the sustainability of waste management scenarios”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 130: 155–165, (2016).
20. [20] Şenol M. B., Adem A. and Dağdeviren M., “A fuzzy MCDM approach to determine the most influential logistic factors”, Politeknik Dergisi, 22: 793–800, (2019).
21. [21] Makan A. and Fadili A., “Sustainability assessment of healthcare waste treatment systems using surrogate weights and PROMETHEE method”, Waste Management & Research, 39: 73–82, (2021).
22. [22] Garcia-Garcia G., “Using multi-criteria decision-making to optimise solid waste management”, Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 37: 100650, (2022).
23. [23] Palafox-Alcantar P. G., Hunt D. V. L. and Rogers C. D. F., “The complementary use of game theory for the circular economy: A review of waste management decision-making methods in civil engineering”, Waste Management, 102: 598–612, (2020).
24. [24] Soltani A., Hewage K., Reza B. and Sadiq R., “Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: A review”, Waste Management, 35: 318–328, (2015).
25. [25] Kahraman C., Keshavarz Ghorabaee M., Zavadskas E. K., Cevik Onar S., Yazdani M. and Oztaysi B., “Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection”, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 25: 1–12, (2017).
26. [26] Paul T. K., Jana C. and Pal M., “Multi-criteria group decision-making method in disposal of municipal solid waste based on cubic Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach with incomplete weight information”, Applied Soft Computing, 144: 110515, (2023).
27. [27] Behzad M., Hashemkhani Zolfani S., Pamucar D. and Behzad M., “A comparative assessment of solid waste management performance in the Nordic countries based on BWM-EDAS”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 266: 122008, (2020).
28. [28] Aghajani Mir M., Taherei Ghazvinei P., Sulaiman N. M. N., Basri N. E. A., Saheri S., Mahmood N. Z., et al., “Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model”, Journal of Environmental Management, 166: 109–115, (2016).
29. [29] Coban A., Ertis I. F. and Cavdaroglu N. A., “Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 180: 159–167, (2018).
30. [30] Chen Z., Wang X., Peng J., Zhang H., Wang J. and Wang X., “An integrated probabilistic linguistic projection method for MCGDM based on ELECTRE III and the weighted convex median voting rule”, Expert Systems, 37: e12593, (2020).
31. [31] Luo C., Ju Y., Santibanez Gonzalez E. D. R., Dong P. and Wang A., “The waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic Best-Worst method ANP and double parameters TOPSIS approach: A case study in China”, Energy, 211: 118564, (2020).
32. [32] Sagnak M., Berberoglu Y., Memis İ. and Yazgan O., “Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS”, Waste Management, 127: 37–47, (2021).
33. [33] Bafail O. A. and Abdulaal R. M. S., “New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques”, Waste Management & Research, 39: 1406–1413, (2021).
34. [34] Dündar S., “TR83 bölgesinde K-Means ve ARAS yöntemiyle kompost tesisi kuruluş yeri seçimi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 38: 2607–2624, (2023).
35. [35] Wang Z., Baydaş M., Stević Ž., Özçil A., Irfan S. A., Wu Z., et al., “Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods”, Demonstratio Mathematica, 56: (no pages given), (2023).
36. [36] Kokkinos K., Lakioti E., Moustakas K., Tsanaktsidis C. and Karayannis V., “Sustainable medical waste management using an intuitionistic fuzzy-based decision support system”, Sustainability, 16: 298, (2023).
37. [37] Rehman A. U., Shekhovtsov A., Rehman N., Faizi S. and Sałabun W., “On the analytic hierarchy process structure in group decision-making using incomplete fuzzy information with applications”, Symmetry, 13: 609, (2021).
38. [38] Seker S., “IoT based sustainable smart waste management system evaluation using MCDM model under interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment”, Technology in Society, 71: 102100, (2022).
39. [39] Gao F., Han M., Wang S. and Gao J., “A novel Fermatean fuzzy BWM-VIKOR based multi-criteria decision-making approach for selecting health care waste treatment technology”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127: 107451, (2024).
40. [40] Chakraborty S. and Saha A. K., “Novel Fermatean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operators for selecting optimal health care waste treatment technology”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119: 105752, (2023).
41. [41] Eghbali-Zarch M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Dehghan-Sanej K. and Kaboli A., “Prioritizing the effective strategies for construction and demolition waste management using fuzzy IDOCRIW and WASPAS methods”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29: 1109–1138, (2022).
42. [42] Demircan B. G. and Yetilmezsoy K., “A hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach for implementation of smart sustainable waste management strategies”, Sustainability, 15: 6526, (2023).
43. [43] Abdullah L., Zulkifli N., Liao H., Herrera-Viedma E. and Al-Barakati A., “An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL method combined with Choquet integral for sustainable solid waste management”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 82: 207–215, (2019).
44. [44] Van Thanh N., “Optimal waste-to-energy strategy assisted by fuzzy MCDM model for sustainable solid waste management”, Sustainability, 14: 6565, (2022).
45. [45] Suvitha K., Narayanamoorthy S., Pamucar D. and Kang D., “An ideal plastic waste management system based on an enhanced MCDM technique”, Artificial Intelligence Review, 57: 1–24, (2024).
46. [46] Rani P., Mishra A. R., Krishankumar R., Ravichandran K. S. and Gandomi A. H., “A new Pythagorean fuzzy based decision framework for assessing healthcare waste treatment”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69: 2915–2929, (2022).
47. [47] Kumar S., Priyanka, Shard, Chandra A., Kumar A. and Kalia S., “A MULTIMOORA-based MCDM model under picture fuzzy environment for converting municipal solid waste to energy in Himalayan Region: A sustainable technology assessment”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 59: 103399, (2023).
48. [48] Öztürk M. and Paksoy T., “Tedarikçi seçimi için yeni bir aralık tip-2 hibrit bulanık kural tabanlı AHP sistemi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35: 1519–1536, (2020).
49. [49] Keshavarz Ghorabaee M., Zavadskas E. K., Olfat L. and Turskis Z., “Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS)”, Informatica, 26: 435–451, (2015).
50. [50] Olson D. L., “Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40: 721–727, (2004).
51. [51] Chang D. Y., “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649–655, (1996).
52. [52] Ma Q., Sun H., Chen Z. and Tan Y., “A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets”, PLOS One, 18: e0294596, (2023).
53. [53] Alao M., Ayodele T. and Ogunjuyigbe A., “Multi-criteria decision based waste to energy technology selection using entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique: The case study of Lagos, Nigeria”, Energy, (2020).
54. [54] Kara A. M., “Bulanık EDAS yöntemi ile Doğu Karadeniz bölgesi illerinin yaşanabilirlik düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (2024).
55. [55] Kabadayı N. and Dağ S., “Bulanık CRITIC ve Bulanık EDAS yöntemleri ile 3 boyutlu yazıcı seçimi”, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 2024: 121–138, (2024).
56. [56] Koç Ustalı N., Tekin M., Toraman Y., Tekin M. F., Toraman M. and Merdivenci Y., “Küresel risk yönetimi indeksi değerlendirmesi: Gri tabanlı TOPSİS yöntemi uygulaması”, Politeknik Dergisi, 27: 1875–1888, (2024).
57. [57] Yegen N. and Gül S., “Çevik proje yönetiminde Scrum takımlarının başarı sınıflandırmasına yönelik bir ÇKKV modeli: AHS bütünleşik TOPSIS-Sort-B”, Politeknik Dergisi, 27: 731–748, (2024).
58. [58] Colvero D. A., Ramalho J., Gomes A. P. D., Matos M. A. A. de and Tarelho L. A. da C., “Economic analysis of a shared municipal solid waste management facility in a metropolitan region”, Waste Management, 102: 823–837, (2020).
59. [59] Iqbal A., Yasar A., Nizami A. S., Haider R., Sultan I. A., Kedwaii A. A., et al., “Empirical analysis of cost-effective and equitable solid waste management systems: Environmental and economic perspectives”, Environmental Research, 244: 117858, (2024).
60. [60] Huijbregts M. A. J., Steinmann Z. J. N., Elshout P. M. F., Stam G., Verones F., Vieira M., et al., “ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22: 138–147, (2017).
61. [61] Bulle C., Margni M., Patouillard L., Boulay A. M., Bourgault G., De Bruille V., et al., “IMPACT World+: A globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24: 1653–1674, (2019).
62. [62] Haupt M., Vadenbo C. and Hellweg S., “Do we have the right performance indicators for the circular economy? Insight into the Swiss waste management system”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21: 615–627, (2017).
63. [63] Hondroyiannis G., Sardianou E., Nikou V., Evangelinos K. and Nikolaou I., “Recycling rate performance and socioeconomic determinants: Evidence from aggregate and regional data across European Union countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 434: 139877, (2024).
64. [64] Antonopoulos I., Faraca G. and Tonini D., “Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers”, Waste Management, (2021).
65. [65] Blengini G. A. and Garbarino E., “Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): The role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18: 1021–1030, (2010).
66. [66] Khoshsepehr Z., Alinejad S. and Alimohammadlou M., “Exploring industrial waste management challenges and smart solutions: An integrated hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 420: 138327, (2023).
67. [67] Çevik Aka D., “Endüstriyel atık geri dönüşümünde etkili olan karar kriterlerinin BWM ile değerlendirilmesi: Plastik, cam ve çelik endüstrisinde uygulama”, European Journal of Science and Technology, 2021: 390–398, (2021).
68. [68] Shahnazari A., Rafiee M., Rohani A., Nagar B. B., Ebrahiminik M. A. and Aghkhani M. H., “Identification of effective factors to select energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A review of thermochemical technologies”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 40: 100737, (2020).
69. [69] Vučijak B., Kurtagić S. M. and Silajdžić I., “Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: A municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 130: 166–174, (2016).
70. [70] Roy M. and Sarker J., “Integration of circular economy principles within information logistics: Case study of Australia”, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, (2025).
71. [71] Gonçalves H., Magalhães V. S. M., Ferreira L. M. D. F. and Arantes A., “Overcoming barriers to sustainable supply chain management in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multi-criteria decision-making approach”, Sustainability, 16: 506, (2024).
72. [72] Pehlivan E., Yazıcı M. and Güner G., “Endüstriyel katı atıklar ve geri kazanım”, ISEM 2014 Kongresi Bildirisi, (2014).
73. [73] İçgen B., “Hidrokarbon kirliliği gösteren yüzey sularından hidrokarbon degredasyonunda etkin bakterilerin izole edilmesi ve degredasyon yeteneklerinin belirlenmesi”, Yüksek Lisans/Doktora Tezi, OpenMETU, (2015).
74. [74] Oğuz H., “Entegre endüstriyel kirliliği önleme ve kontrol çalışmaları”, Lefke Avrupa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (2010).