Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications

Yıl 2017, , 915 - 921, 20.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.369087

Öz

Recently, energy need
is exponentially increasing in the world while energy sources are decreasing
rapidly. Therefore, this issue requires energy sources to be used more
efficiently and urges professionals to utilize energy from low temperature
energy sources such as waste heat and low temperature renewable sources. In
this study, energy and exergy analyses of several clean working fluids are
comparatively studied in several organic Rankine cycle configurations. CO2,
N2O, and SF6 fluids are compared with the conventional
R23 in three ORC configurations, namely the basic ORC cycle, regenerative ORC
cycle, and reheat and regenerative ORC cycle, respectively. Effects of various
selected system and environmental parameters on the system performances are
comprehensively investigated. Even though R23 shows the best energy and exergy
performances than those of other investigated working fluids at low-temperature
applications, N2O and CO2 provide a clean solution to
high GWP (global warming potential) R23 with similar performance
characteristics at low and high temperature power generation applications.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Liu B.T., Chien K.H. and Wang C.C., “Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery”, Energy, 29: 1207-1217, (2004). [2] Roy J.P., Mishra M.K. and Misra A., “Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle”, Energy, 35(12): 5049–5062, (2010). [3] Lecompte S., Huisseune H., Broek M.V.D., Vanslambrouck B. and Papepe M.D., “Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47: 448-461, (2015). [4] Wang X.D. and Zhao L., “Analysis of zeotropic mixtures used in low-temperature solar Rankine cycles for power generation”, Solar Energy, 83(5): 605–613, (2009). [5] Rayegan R. and Tao Y.X., “A procedure to select working fluids for solar organic Rankine cycles (ORCs)”, Renewable Energy, 36 (2): 659–670, (2011). [6] Freeman J., Hellgardt K. and Markides C.N., “An assessment of solar-powered organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heating and power in UK domestic applications”, Applied Energy, 138: 605-620, (2015). [7] Shengjun Z., Huaixin W. and Tao G., “Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle(ORC) and transcritical Power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation”, Applied Energy, 88(8): 2740–2754, (2011). [8] Ozcan H. and Dincer I., "Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated sofc, solar orc and absorption chiller for tri‐generation applications", Fuel Cells, 13: 781-793, (2013). [9] Ozcan H. and Dincer I., "Thermodynamic analysis of a combined chemical looping-based trigeneration system", Energy Conversion and Management, 85: 477-487, (2014). [10] Ozcan H. and Dincer, I. "Performance evaluation of an SOFC based trigeneration system using various gaseous fuels from biomass gasification", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40: 7798-7807, (2015). [11] Hu D., Li S., Zheng Y., Wang J. and Dai Y., “Preliminary design and off performance analysis of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal sources”, Energy Conversion and Management, 96: 175-187, (2015). [12] Cengel Y.A. and Boles M.A., “Thermodynamics and engineering approach- 8th edition”, McGraw Hill, New York, 2014.
  • [13] Zamfirescu C. and Dincer I., “Thermodynamic analysis of a novel ammonia-water trilateral Rankine cycle”. Thermochemical Acta, 477: 7-15, (2008). [14] Hung T.C., “Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids”, Energy Conversion and Management, 42: 239-553, (2001). [15] Chen Y., Lundqvist P., Johansson A. and Platell P., “A comparative study of the carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle compared with an organic rankine cycle with R123 as working fluid in waste heat recovery”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26: 2142-2147, (2006). [16] Mago P.J., Chamra L.M., Srinivasan C.K. and Somayaji C., “An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 28: 998-1007, (2008). [17] Gang P., Jing L. and Jie J., “Analysis of lower temperature solar thermal electric generation using regenerative organic Rankine cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering, 30: 998-1004, (2010). [18] Xu J. and Liu C., “Effect of the critical temperature of organic fluids on supercritical pressure organic Rankine cycle”, Energy, 63: 209-122, (2013). [19] Yin H., Sabau A.S., Conklin J.C., McFarlane J. and Qualls A.L., “Mixtures of SF6-CO2 as working fluids for geothermal power plants”, Applied Energy, 106: 243-253, (2013). [20] Meinel D., Wieland C. and Spliethoff H., “Effect and comparison of different working fluids on a two stage organic Rankine cycle (ORC) concept”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 63: 246-253, (2014). [21] Astolfi M., Romano M.C., Bombarda P. and Macchi E., “Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium-low temperature geothermal sources-Part A: Thermodynamic optimization”, Energy, 66: 423-434, (2014). [22] Maraver D., Royo J., Lemort V. and Quoilin S., “Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications”, Applied Energy, 117: 11-29, (2014). [23] Braimakis K., Preißinger M., Brüggemann D., Karellas S. and Panopoulos K., “Low grade waste heat recovery with subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based on natural refrigerants and their binary mixtures”, Energy, 88: 80-92, (2015). [24] Toffolo A., Lazzaretto A., Manente G. and Paci M., “A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in organic Rankine cycle systems”, Applied Energy, 121: 219-232, (2014). [25] Andreasen J.G., Larsen U., Knudsen T., Pierobon L. and Haglind F., “Selection and optimization of pure and mixed working fluids for low grade heat utilization using organic Rankine cycles”, Energy, 73: 204- 213, (2014). [26] Dincer I. snd Rosen M.A., “Exergy, energy, environment and sustainable development”, Elsevier, (2007).
Toplam 2 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Hasan Ozcan

Sertac Samed Seyitoglu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017

Kaynak Göster

APA Ozcan, H., & Seyitoglu, S. S. (2017). Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4), 915-921. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.369087
AMA Ozcan H, Seyitoglu SS. Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi. Aralık 2017;20(4):915-921. doi:10.2339/politeknik.369087
Chicago Ozcan, Hasan, ve Sertac Samed Seyitoglu. “Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications”. Politeknik Dergisi 20, sy. 4 (Aralık 2017): 915-21. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.369087.
EndNote Ozcan H, Seyitoglu SS (01 Aralık 2017) Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi 20 4 915–921.
IEEE H. Ozcan ve S. S. Seyitoglu, “Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications”, Politeknik Dergisi, c. 20, sy. 4, ss. 915–921, 2017, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.369087.
ISNAD Ozcan, Hasan - Seyitoglu, Sertac Samed. “Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications”. Politeknik Dergisi 20/4 (Aralık 2017), 915-921. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.369087.
JAMA Ozcan H, Seyitoglu SS. Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi. 2017;20:915–921.
MLA Ozcan, Hasan ve Sertac Samed Seyitoglu. “Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications”. Politeknik Dergisi, c. 20, sy. 4, 2017, ss. 915-21, doi:10.2339/politeknik.369087.
Vancouver Ozcan H, Seyitoglu SS. Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi. 2017;20(4):915-21.
 
TARANDIĞIMIZ DİZİNLER (ABSTRACTING / INDEXING)
181341319013191 13189 13187 13188 18016 

download Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası ile lisanslanmıştır.