Kinetic Studies of Biogas Generation Using Chicken Manure as Feedstock

Öz

The gas generated by anaerobic fermentation of organic wastes is called biogas. Since it contains methane, it can be burnt and so it can be used as an alternative energy source. The production of biogas is an anaerobic treatment process, it is important to understand the basic biochemistry and microbiology of anaerobic systems. This study demonstrates the kinetic study to find out the best microbial kinetics which will be necessary for the design of an anaerobic fermenter. For this purpose, chicken manure and chicken manure with inoculation culture were used. Experiments were operated under mesophilic conditions in laboratory type glass fermenters each having a volume of ten liters.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biogas,renewable energy,chicken manure,microbial kinetics

Kaynakça

1. [1] Chang, I.S., Zhao, J., Yin, X., Wu, J., Jia, Z. and Wang., L., “Comprehensive utilizations of biogas in Inner Mongolia”, Renew. and Sust. Energy Rev., 15: 1442-1453, (2011).
2. [2] Yadvika, Santosh, Sreekrishnan, T.R., Kohli, S. and Rana, V., “Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques-a review”, Bioresour. Technol., 95: 1-10, (2004).
3. [3] Makaruk, A., Miltner, M. and Harasek., M., “Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas”, Sep. Pur. Tech., 74: 83-92, (2010) .
4. [4] Rasi, S., Veijanen, A. and Rintala., J., “Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants”, Energy, 32: 1375-1380, (2007).
5. [5] Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G. andHan, X., “Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw”, Bioresour. Technol., 120: 78-83, (2012).
6. [6] White, A.J., Kirk, D.W. and Graydon, J.W., “Analysis of small-scale biogas utilization systems on Ontario cattle farms”, Renew. Energy., 36: 1019-1025, (2011).
7. [7] Fezzani, B. and Cheikh, R.B., “Two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastes in semi-continuous digesters at mesophilic temperature”, Bioresour. Technol., 101(6): 1628-1634, (2010).
8. [8] Kim, J.K., Oh, B.R., Chun, Y.N. and Kim, S.W., “Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste”, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 102(4): 328-332, (2006).

9. [9] Kythreotou, N., Florides, G. and Tassou, S.A., “A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion”, Renew. Energy, 71: 701-714, (2014).
10. [10] Markowski, M., Bialobrzewski, I., Zielinski, M., Debowski, M. and Krzemieniewski, M., “Optimizing low-temperature biogas production from biomass by anaerobic digestion”, Renew. Energy, 69: 219-225, (2014).
11. [11] Biswas, J., Chowdhury, R. and Bhattacharya, P., “Kinetic studies of biogas generation using municipal waste as feed stock”, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 38: 493-503, (2006).
12. [12] Yusuf, M.O.L. and Ify, N.L., “The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth”, Biomass Bioenergy., 35: 1345-1351, (2011).
13. [13] Abdullahi, I., Ismail, A., Musa, A. O. and Galadima, A., “Effect of kinetic parameters on biogas production from local substrate using a batch feeding digester”, Eur. J. Sci. Res., 57(4): 626-634, (2011).
14. [14] Syaichurrozi, I., “Biogas production from co-digestion salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics”, Renew. Energy., 115: 76-86, (2018).
15. [15] Yilmaz, A.H., “Fermentation of organic solid wastes as a source of renewable energy and the use of the product as fertilizer”, MSc. Thesis, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, (1998).
16. [16] Yilmaz, A.H. and Atalay, F.S., “Modeling of the anaerobic decomposition of solid wastes”, Energy Source, 25: 1063,1072, (2003).
17. [17] Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L.S. and Greenberg, A.E., “Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater”, Water Environment Federation, 2: 3-58, (1995).
18. [18] Beba, A. and Atalay, F.S., “Mathematical models for methane production in batch fermenters”, Biomass, 11: 173-184, (1986).