Investigation of the R260 Rail Steel Behavior at Varying Temperatures by EMI Method

Yıl 2019, , 955 - 960, 01.12.2019

Mesut Tekkalmaz , Gökhan Haydarlar , Ümit Er

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.463956

Öz

In
recent years, Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) method has been widely used in
structural health monitoring (SHM). In this method, lead zirconate titanate
(PZT) ceramic sensor patch is added to the structure to be monitored for
structural health. Impedance and admittance characteristics are measured using
an impedance analyzer, which forms the reference characteristic in the
evaluation of structural health. It is expected that these characteristics will
not change as long as there is no change in the structure. However, it is known
that these characteristics change in some situations, such as exposure to
external environmental conditions and temperature fluctuations. If the effect
of temperature is not taken into account, it leads to misinterpretations as if
there were faults in the structure. Rails are exposed to changing environmental
conditions continuously. In this study, the behavior of the R260 rail steel at
varying temperatures is investigated using the EMI method. As a result of the
experimental studies, it has been observed that frequency and amplitude change
with decreasing temperature. This change has been interpreted using damage
metrics. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

EMI method, temperature effect, rail

R260 Ray Çeliğinin Değişen Sıcaklıklardaki Davranışının EMI Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi

Öz

Yapısal
sağlık izleme (SHM)’de son yıllarda Elektromekanik Empedans (EMI) yöntemi
yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu yöntemde yapısal sağlığı denetlenecek yapıya
kurşun-zirkonat-titanat (PZT) seramik sensör yaması eklenir. Empedans analizör
kullanılarak empedans ve admittans karakteristikleri ölçülür. Bu ölçümler
yapısal sağlığın değerlendirilmesinde referans karakteristiğini oluşturur. Bu
karakteristiklerin yapıda hata, kusur vb. olmadığı sürece değişmemesi beklenir.
Ancak değişen çevresel koşullar ve sıcaklık dalgalanmaları gibi bazı durumlarda
bu karakteristiklerin değiştiği bilinmektedir. Eğer sıcaklık etkisi dikkate
alınmazsa, yapıda hata, kusur vb. olmadığı halde varmış gibi yanlış yorumlamalara
yol açar. Raylar sürekli olarak değişen çevresel koşullara maruz kalmaktadır.
Bu çalışmada, R260 ray çeliğinin değişen sıcaklıklardaki davranışı EMI yöntemi
kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Yapılan deneysel çalışmaların sonucunda, sıcaklık
azaldıkça frekans ve genliğin değiştiği gözlenmiştir. Bu değişim hasar
metrikleri kullanılarak yorumlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

EMI yöntemi, sıcaklık etkisi, ray

Kaynakça

• 1. Aktan A. E., Helmicki A. J. and Hunt V. J., “Issues in health monitoring for intelligent infrastructure”, Smart Materials and Structures, 7(5): 674-692, (1998).
• 2. Doebling S. W., Farrar C. R. and Prime, M. B., “A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods”, The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2): 91-105, (1998).
• 3. Shankar R., “An integrated approach for structural health monitoring”, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, (2009).
• 4. Siebel, T. and Lilov, M., “Experimental investigation on improving electromechanical impedance based damage detection by temperature compensation”, Key Engineering Materials, 569: 1132-1139, (2013).
• 5. Baptista F. G., Budoya D. E., De Almeida V. A. and Ulson J. A., “An experimental study on the effect of temperature on piezoelectric sensors for impedance-based structural health monitoring”, Sensors (Basel), 14(1): 1208-1227, (2014).
• 6. Zou, D., Liu, T., Liang, C., Huang, Y., Zhang, F., Du, C., “An experimental investigation on the health monitoring of concrete structures using piezoelectric transducers at various environmental temperatures”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 26(8): 1028-1034, (2015).
• 7. Wandowski T., Malinowski P. H. and Ostachowicz W. M., 2016, “Delamination detection in CFRP panels using EMI method with temperature compensation, Composite Structures, 151: 99-107, (2016).
• 8. Xu G., Xu B., Xu C. and Luo Y., “Temperature effects in the analysis of electromechanical impedance by using spectral element method”, Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures, 12(1): 119-132, (2016).
• 9. Haider M. F., Giurgiutiu V., Lin B. and Yu L., “Irreversibility effects in piezoelectric wafer active sensors after exposure to high temperature”, Smart Materials and Structures, 26(9): 095019, (2017).
• 10. Vishay Micro-Measurements, “Strain Gages and Instrumentation Knowledge base”. http://www.vishaypg.com/micro-measurements/stress-analysis-strain-gages/knowledge-base-list/ and http://www.vishaypg.com/micromeasurements/videos/?video513, (2013).
• 11. Giurgiutiu V., “Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors”, Second Edition, Elsevier, U.S.A., (2014).
• 12. Rabelo, D.S., Steffen, V., Neto, R.M.F. and Lacerda, H.B., “Impedance-based structural health monitoring and statistical method for threshold-level determination applied to 2024-T3 aluminum panels under varying temperature”, Structural Health Monitoring, 16(4), 365-381, (2017).
• 13. Sepehry, N., Shamshirsaz, M. and Bastani, A., “Experimental and theoretical analysis in impedance-based structural health monitoring with varying temperature”, Structural Health Monitoring, 10(6), 573-585, (2010).
• 14. Sepehry, N., Shamshirsaz, M. and Abdollahi, F., “Temperature variation effect compensation in impedance-based structural health monitoring using neural networks”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22(17), 1975-1982, (2011).