Model Based Predictive Engine Torque Control for Improved Driveability

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 71 - 82, 01.03.2017

Murat Ötkür Orhan Atabay İsmail Murat Ereke

Öz

An engine brake torque based Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm with an additional anti-shuffle control element is developed to manipulate the pedal map oriented brake torque demand signal in an automotive powertrain application. In order to capture the longitudinal vehicle dynamics of a front wheel drive vehicle, a simplified 4 mass powertrain model is generated. Model validation is performed with vehicle tests using a typical tip-in and back-out acceleration pedal signal input manoeuvre. Comparison of simulation results and vehicle tests reveals that simplified model is capable of capturing vehicle acceleration profile with the error states for the specified input signals. MPC scheme based on 2 mass vehicle model is developed in “MATLAB / Simulink” environment to obtain a smooth and responsive acceleration profile without error states like excessive jerks and shuffles. An additional engine to wheel speed difference based proportional controller employed in order to further reduce powertrain oscillations without compromising from system response speed. Simulation results indicate that MPC plus P Controller is capable of obtaining desired acceleration and deceleration profiles achieving improved driveability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Drivability, Driveline Modelling, Model Predictive Control

Kaynakça

• 1. De La Salle S., Jansz M. and Light D., “Design of feedback control system for damping of vehicle shuffle”, EAEC conference, Barcelona, 1-10, (1999).
• 2. Fredriksson J., Weifors H., and Egardt B., “Powertrain control for active damping of driveline oscillations”, International Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics, 37(5): 359-376, (2002).
• 3. Baumann J., Swarnakar A. and Kiencke U., “A robust controller design for anti-jerking”, SAE Technical Paper, No: 01-0041, (2005).
• 4. Baumann J., Torkzadeh D., Ramstein A., Kiencke U. and Schlegl, T., “Model-based predictive anti-jerk control”, Control Engineering Practice, 14: 259-266, (2006).
• 5. Pettersson M. and Nielsen L., “Diesel engine speed control with handling of driveline resonances”, Control Engineering Practice, 11: 319-328, (2003).
• 6. Berriri M., Chevrel P., Lefebvre D., and Yagoubi, M., “Active damping of automotive powertrain oscillations by a partial torque compensator”, American Control Conference, New York, 5718-5723, (2007).
• 7. Webersinke L., Augenstein L. and Kienche, U., “Adaptive linear quadratic control for high dynamical and comfortable behaviour of a Heavy Truck”, SAE Technical Paper, No: 01-0534, (2008).
• 8. Templin P. and Egardt, B., “An LQR torque compensator for driveline oscillation damping”, IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Saint Petersburg, 352-356, (2009).
• 9. Templin, P. and Egardt, B., “A powertrain LQT-torque compensator with backlash handling”, Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 66(4): 645-654, (2011).
• 10. He L., Li L., Yu L., Mao E. and Song, J., “A torque-based nonlinear predictive control approach of automotive powertrain by iterative optimization”, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 226(8) 1016-1025, (2012).
• 11. Fang C., Cao Z., Ektesabi M. M., Kapoor A. and Sayem A. H. M., “Model reference control for active drivability improvement”, International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, Melbourne, 202-206, (2014).
• 12. Pacejka H., B., “Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics”, Butterworth-Heinemann, 9780080970165, Oxford, (2006).
• 13. Otkur M., Atabay O. and Ereke M., “In Cylinder Pressure Based Brake Torque Model For Diesel Engines”, International Conference on Automotive & Vehicle Technologies, İstanbul, 182-191, (2013).