Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 581 - 586, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411

Öz

In this study, the complex of buildings built in Turkey's eastern and western regions (Kırklareli- Pehlivanköy, and Gaziantep-Oğuzeli) energy performance levels was investigated according to European specification. To determine these levels were used Building Energy Performance (BEP) program. It is a software that has been in force the protection of the environment and limitation of greenhouse gas emissions regarding primary energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of buildings, according to "Energy Performance Regulations at Buildings" of the Ministry of Environment and Urban Plannings since 2010. Building geometry, heating, lighting, ventilation, mechanical and technical values project data is entered into the program. It has been identified what the amount of energy required by the building through the program, daylighting needs for areas where the effectiveness of energy utilization daylight time from light and carbon emissions is. After all, under EU norms, evaluation of energy certification of buildings built in different regions of all energy, fuel costs, climate and regional differences revealed that changes were explained. A result, energy data of Gaziantep reception center which was built in Turkey's southeastern is lower than 8% energy data of Kırklareli reception center which was made in Turkey's region of Thrace. However, when looking at the results obtained carbon emissions, lighting, ventilation and hot water systems has been shown to occur in the near value for the two centers. It has been observed that there are differences in heating and cooling systems.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Doukas H, Nychtis C, Psarras J. “Assessing energy-saving measures in buildings through an intelligent decision support model”, Building and Environment, 44: 290-298, (2009).
  • [2] Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M, Leaman A. “Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings”, Building Research & Information, 29: 114-12, (2001).
  • [3] Wang S, Yan C, Xiao F. Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings, Energy and Buildings, 55: 873-888, (2012).
  • [4] Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, Balaras CA, Kontoyiannidis S. “Building typologies as a tool for assessing the energy performance of residential buildings – A case study for the Hellenic building stock”, Energy and Buildings, 43: 3400-3409, (2011).
  • [5] Menezes AC, Cripps A, Bouchlaghem D, Buswell R. “Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap”, Applied Energy, 97: 355-364. (2012).
  • [6] Deng S-M, Burnett J. “A study of energy performance of hotel buildings in Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings, 31: 7-12, (2000). [7] Tsikaloudaki K, Theodosiou T, Laskos K, Bikas D. “Assessing cooling energy performance of windows for residential buildings in the Mediterranean zone”, Energy Conversion and Management, 64: 335-343, (2012).
  • [8] Olesen BW. “The philosophy behind EN15251: Indoor environmental criteria for design and calculation of energy performance of buildings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 740-749, (2007).
  • [9] Poel B, van Cruchten G, Balaras CA., “Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 393-403, (2007).
  • [10] Ingrao C, Lo Giudice A, Bacenetti J, Tricase C, Dotelli G, Fiala M, et al. “Energy and environmental assessment of industrial hemp for building applications: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51: 29-42, (2015)
  • [11] Pfafferott J, Herkel S, Wambsganß M. “Design, monitoring and evaluation of a low energy office building with passive cooling by night ventilation”, Energy and Buildings, 36: 455-465, (2004).
  • [12] Atmaca M. KE, Yılmaz Z. A., “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method (BEP-TR) and Hotel Performance Evaluation of Buildings”. X National Installation Engineering Congress, 811-826, (2011).
  • [13] Santamouris M, Argiriou A., “Renewable energies and energy conservation technologies for buildings in southern Europe”, International Journal of Solar Energy, 15: 69-79, (1994).
  • [14] Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K. “Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview”, Energy and Buildings, 42: 1592-600, (2010).
  • [15] Eskin N. “Annual Energy Needs Analysis of Non-Residential Buildings”. İTÜ, İstanbul, 1-6, (2011).
  • [16] Aykal D, Gümüş B, Özbudak Y., “Scope of Application of Renewable and Efficient Energy Use in Buildings Sustainability”, V Symposium on Renewable Energy Sources, Diyarbakır, 78-84, (2009).
  • [17] Ding G, Forsythe PJ. “Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings”, Construction Management and Economics, 31: 254-265, (2013).
  • [18] European Commission, EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2002/91 EC-Official Journal L 001. Brussels, (2002).
  • [19] European Commission, European Commission Directorate general for energy and transport. European Energy and Transport Trends to 2030. Brussels, (2003).
  • [20]http://www.sisecamduzcam.com/sites/catalogs/tr/Documents/gunes-kolektor-camlari-dokumanlari/gunes-enerjisi-camlari-brosuru.pdf
  • [21] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= celex%3A32002L0091. Access date: 04.06.2018.
  • [22] Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method Utility User's Guide”. Ankara, 1-64.
  • [23] Turkish National Police. Department of Foreigners Borders and Asylum. Project The Information Note and Project Treatment. Ankara, (2010).

Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 581 - 586, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411

Öz

In this study, the complex of buildings built in Turkey's eastern and western regions (Kırklareli- Pehlivanköy, and Gaziantep-Oğuzeli) energy performance levels was investigated according to European specification. To determine these levels were used Building Energy Performance (BEP) program. It is a software that has been in force the protection of the environment and limitation of greenhouse gas emissions regarding primary energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of buildings, according to "Energy Performance Regulations at Buildings" of the Ministry of Environment and Urban Plannings since 2010. Building geometry, heating, lighting, ventilation, mechanical and technical values project data is entered into the program. It has been identified what the amount of energy required by the building through the program, daylighting needs for areas where the effectiveness of energy utilization daylight time from light and carbon emissions is. After all, under EU norms, evaluation of energy certification of buildings built in different regions of all energy, fuel costs, climate and regional differences revealed that changes were explained. A result, energy data of Gaziantep reception center which was built in Turkey's southeastern is lower than 8% energy data of Kırklareli reception center which was made in Turkey's region of Thrace. However, when looking at the results obtained carbon emissions, lighting, ventilation and hot water systems has been shown to occur in the near value for the two centers. It has been observed that there are differences in heating and cooling systems.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Doukas H, Nychtis C, Psarras J. “Assessing energy-saving measures in buildings through an intelligent decision support model”, Building and Environment, 44: 290-298, (2009).
  • [2] Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M, Leaman A. “Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings”, Building Research & Information, 29: 114-12, (2001).
  • [3] Wang S, Yan C, Xiao F. Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings, Energy and Buildings, 55: 873-888, (2012).
  • [4] Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, Balaras CA, Kontoyiannidis S. “Building typologies as a tool for assessing the energy performance of residential buildings – A case study for the Hellenic building stock”, Energy and Buildings, 43: 3400-3409, (2011).
  • [5] Menezes AC, Cripps A, Bouchlaghem D, Buswell R. “Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap”, Applied Energy, 97: 355-364. (2012).
  • [6] Deng S-M, Burnett J. “A study of energy performance of hotel buildings in Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings, 31: 7-12, (2000). [7] Tsikaloudaki K, Theodosiou T, Laskos K, Bikas D. “Assessing cooling energy performance of windows for residential buildings in the Mediterranean zone”, Energy Conversion and Management, 64: 335-343, (2012).
  • [8] Olesen BW. “The philosophy behind EN15251: Indoor environmental criteria for design and calculation of energy performance of buildings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 740-749, (2007).
  • [9] Poel B, van Cruchten G, Balaras CA., “Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 393-403, (2007).
  • [10] Ingrao C, Lo Giudice A, Bacenetti J, Tricase C, Dotelli G, Fiala M, et al. “Energy and environmental assessment of industrial hemp for building applications: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51: 29-42, (2015)
  • [11] Pfafferott J, Herkel S, Wambsganß M. “Design, monitoring and evaluation of a low energy office building with passive cooling by night ventilation”, Energy and Buildings, 36: 455-465, (2004).
  • [12] Atmaca M. KE, Yılmaz Z. A., “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method (BEP-TR) and Hotel Performance Evaluation of Buildings”. X National Installation Engineering Congress, 811-826, (2011).
  • [13] Santamouris M, Argiriou A., “Renewable energies and energy conservation technologies for buildings in southern Europe”, International Journal of Solar Energy, 15: 69-79, (1994).
  • [14] Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K. “Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview”, Energy and Buildings, 42: 1592-600, (2010).
  • [15] Eskin N. “Annual Energy Needs Analysis of Non-Residential Buildings”. İTÜ, İstanbul, 1-6, (2011).
  • [16] Aykal D, Gümüş B, Özbudak Y., “Scope of Application of Renewable and Efficient Energy Use in Buildings Sustainability”, V Symposium on Renewable Energy Sources, Diyarbakır, 78-84, (2009).
  • [17] Ding G, Forsythe PJ. “Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings”, Construction Management and Economics, 31: 254-265, (2013).
  • [18] European Commission, EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2002/91 EC-Official Journal L 001. Brussels, (2002).
  • [19] European Commission, European Commission Directorate general for energy and transport. European Energy and Transport Trends to 2030. Brussels, (2003).
  • [20]http://www.sisecamduzcam.com/sites/catalogs/tr/Documents/gunes-kolektor-camlari-dokumanlari/gunes-enerjisi-camlari-brosuru.pdf
  • [21] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= celex%3A32002L0091. Access date: 04.06.2018.
  • [22] Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method Utility User's Guide”. Ankara, 1-64.
  • [23] Turkish National Police. Department of Foreigners Borders and Asylum. Project The Information Note and Project Treatment. Ankara, (2010).
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Gökhan Durmuş

Sadık Önal Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Durmuş, G., & Önal, S. (2018). Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification. Politeknik Dergisi, 21(3), 581-586. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411
AMA Durmuş G, Önal S. Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification. Politeknik Dergisi. Eylül 2018;21(3):581-586. doi:10.2339/politeknik.450411
Chicago Durmuş, Gökhan, ve Sadık Önal. “Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification”. Politeknik Dergisi 21, sy. 3 (Eylül 2018): 581-86. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411.
EndNote Durmuş G, Önal S (01 Eylül 2018) Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification. Politeknik Dergisi 21 3 581–586.
IEEE G. Durmuş ve S. Önal, “Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification”, Politeknik Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 3, ss. 581–586, 2018, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.450411.
ISNAD Durmuş, Gökhan - Önal, Sadık. “Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification”. Politeknik Dergisi 21/3 (Eylül 2018), 581-586. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411.
JAMA Durmuş G, Önal S. Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification. Politeknik Dergisi. 2018;21:581–586.
MLA Durmuş, Gökhan ve Sadık Önal. “Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification”. Politeknik Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 3, 2018, ss. 581-6, doi:10.2339/politeknik.450411.
Vancouver Durmuş G, Önal S. Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification. Politeknik Dergisi. 2018;21(3):581-6.
 
TARANDIĞIMIZ DİZİNLER (ABSTRACTING / INDEXING)
181341319013191 13189 13187 13188 18016

download Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası ile lisanslanmıştır.