Digitalization and Consumer Activism: Underlying Motives and Feelings of Consumers and Implications for Brands

Öz

This study aims to gain an understanding of the motivations and feelings of consumers when participating in online activism and to examine the effects of digital activism campaigns implemented by brands. The research seeks to answer how consumers are participating in digital activism and their motivations; the feelings of consumers with regards to digital activism and consumer engagement; and how consumers perceive activist movements and practices initiated by brands. Qualitative approach was carried out and 17 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted. Projective techniques were used and examples of activist campaigns of brands were shown to the participants. According to the findings, the motivations of the consumers are sense of responsibility and duty they feel towards social problems, the desire to stay up-to-date and entertainment. The feelings associated with digital activism are gratification, fear, feeling of concern, and hope. The findings have further implications and suggestions for brands to have effective activist campaigns such as: paying attention to language barrier when adapting global campaigns; defending the cause they believe in despite pressures; explaining the reasoning when they do not support a social cause, not to be lynched by consumers; and not choosing an entertainment-oriented approach when addressing sensitive issues.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Consumer Activism
• Brand Activism
• Consumer Motivation
• Digitalization

Dijitalleşme Ve Tüketici Aktivizmi: Tüketicilerin Motivasyonları Ve Duyguları Ve Markalar İçin Sonuçları

Öz

Bu çalışma, tüketicilerin çevrimiçi aktivizme katılma motivasyonları ve duyguları hakkında içgörü elde etmeyi ve markalar tarafından uygulanan dijital aktivizm kampanyalarının tüketiciler üzerindeki etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, tüketicilerin dijital aktivizme nasıl katıldıklarını, aktivist eylemlere katılma motivasyonlarını ve duygularını, markaların başlattığı aktivist hareketleri ve uygulamaları nasıl algıladıklarını yanıtlamayı hedefler. Tüketicilerin duygu ve motivasyonlarını daha iyi anlamak için nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanmış ve 17 yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine mülakat yapılmıştır. Görüşmeler sırasında projektif teknikler kullanılmış ve katılımcılara, markaların aktivist kampanya örnekleri gösterilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, tüketicilerin dijital aktivizme katılma motivasyonları, sosyal sorunlara karşı hissettikleri sorumluluk ve görev bilinci, güncel kalma arzusu ve eğlence kategorileri altında gruplanır. Dijital aktivizme katılırken tüketicilerin hissettikleri duygular, tatmin, korku, endişe ve umuttur. Araştırma ayrıca, tüketicilerin aktivist kampanyaları başarılı bulması için markaların dikkat etmesi gereken kriterler konusunda ışık tutar. Global kampanyaları farklı ülkelerde uyarlarken markaların dil engeline dikkat etmesi gerekir. Markaların siyasi ve toplumsal baskılardan arınarak bir konuyu desteklemesi tüketiciler tarafından daha samimi ve inandırıcı bulunmaktadır. Markanın toplumda değer gören bir konu hakkında sessiz kalması durumunda tüketiciler tarafından linç edilmemesi için o konuya neden destek vermediğini tüketiciye açıklaması gerekmektedir. Toplumsal veya hassas sorunlar kampanya konusu olacaksa, eğlence odaklı bir yaklaşım tercih edilmemelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tüketici Aktivizmi
• Marka Aktivizmi
• Tüketici Motivasyonu
• Dijitalleşme

Kaynakça

1. Ailawadi, K. L., Borin N. and Farris P. W. (1995). Market Power and Performance: A Cross- Industry Analysis of Manufacturers and Retailers. Journal of Retailing, 71(3): 211-248.
2. Alhouti, S., Johnson, C. M. and Holloway, B. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(3): 1242-1249.
3. Ashley, C. and Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Journal of Psychology & Marketing, 32(1): 15-27.
4. Bakardjieva, M., Svensson, J. and Skoric, M. (2012). Digital citizenship and activism: Questions of power and participation online. Journal of Democracy and Open Government, 4(1): i-iv.
5. Belk, R., Devinney, T. and Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Journal of Consumption Markets & Culture, 8(3): 275-289.
6. Benkler,Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Heaven.
7. Bennett, W. L. and Lagos, T. (2007). Logo logic: The ups and downs of branded political communication. Journal of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1): 193-206.
8. Betancourt, R. R. and Gautschi, D. A. (1998). Distribution services and economic power in a channel. Journal of Retailing, 74(1): 37-60.

9. Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1): 9-24.
10. Blevins, K. (2018). Bell Hooks and Consciousness-Raising: Argument for a Fourth Wave of Feminism. Mediating Misogyny, 91-108.
11. Brennan, L. and Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63(2): 140-146.
12. Broberg, C. P. and Doshoris, I. (2020). When Business Becomes Politics-A Study of Consumers' Perceptions and Responses to Brand Activism. Unpublished Master Thesis. Lund University.
13. Bunting, M. and Lipski, R. (2000). Drowned out? Rethinking corporate reputation management for the Internet. Journal of Communication Management, 5(2): 170-178.
14. Cambefort, M. and Roux, E. (2019). A typology of the perceived risks in the context of consumer brand resistance. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(5): 575-585.
15. Caplan, J. (2009). Shoppers, Unite! Carrotmobs are cooler than boycotts. Time Magazine. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1901467,00.html asp (22.01.2021).
16. Carrigan, M. and Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of consumer marketing,18(7): 560-578.
17. Cassel, C. and Symon, G. (1998). Qualitative methods and analysis in organisational research: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
18. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Change.org Global Impact Report (2019). https://static.change.org/brand-pages/impact/reports/2020/2020_Impact+Report_Change_EN_final.pdf. asp (22.01.2021).
20. Chen, Z. (2020). Who becomes an online activist and why: Understanding the publics in politicized consumer activism. Public Relations Review, 46(1).
21. Clemensen, M. (2017). Corporate Political Activism: When and how should companies take a political stand? Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Minnesota.
22. Coleman, S. and Blumler, J. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Copeland, L. (2014). Conceptualizing political consumerism: How citizenship norms differentiate boycotting from boycotting. Political studies, 62: 172-186.
24. Day, G. S. and Aaker, D. A. (1970). Marketing Education: A Guide to Consumerism. Journal of Marketing. 34(3): 12-19.
25. Doruk, E. K. and Akbıçak, A. (2017). Dijital Aktivizm Platformu Change. Org’da Başarıya Ulaşmış Kampanyalara Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Intermedia International e-Journal ISSN: 2149-3669, 4(7): 269-289.
26. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International journal of management reviews, 12(1): 8-19.
27. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of marketing, 51(2): 11-27.
28. Edelman. (2019). 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf asp (22 January 2021).
29. El-Ansary, A. I. and Stern, L. W. (1972). Power measurement in the distribution channel. Journal of Marketing research, 9(1): 47-52.
30. Ferreira, M. L. I. (2018). Brand perceptions of consumer activists using Twitter: an exploratory study. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Johannesburg.
31. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of consumer research, 20(2): 303-315.
32. Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E. and Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of marketing, 74(1): 65-79.
33. Furness, V. (2008). Web 2.0 and the enterprise: Its impact on business and strategies to maximize new opportunities. England: Business Insight.
34. Garrett, J. R. (1987). The proper role of nerves in salivary secretion: a review. Journal of dental research, 66(2): 387-397.
35. Gaski, J. F. and Nevin, J. R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. Journal of marketing research, 22(2): 130-142.
36. Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological Analysis of the Evolution of Digital Activism. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2): 477-489.
37. Grégoire, Y. and Fisher, R. J. (2006). The effects of relationship quality on customer retaliation. Marketing Letters, 17(1): 31-46.
38. Grégoire, Y. and Fisher, R. J. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: when your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2): 247-261.
39. Grégoire, Y., Laufer, D. and Tripp, T. M. (2010). A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: Understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(6): 738-758.
40. Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M. and Legoux, R. (2009). When customer love turns into lasting hate: The effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of marketing, 73(6): 18-32.
41. Gretzel, U. (2017). Social media activism in tourism. The Sage Handbook of Tourism Management, 15(2): 1-14.
42. Hermann, A. (2020). Ensuring Brand Activism in Integrated Marketing Communications Campaigns Resonates with Millennial Consumers. Unpublished Honors Thesis. The University of Mississippi.
43. Hibbard, J. D., Kumar, N. and Stern, L. W. (2001). Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships. Journal of marketing research, 38(1): 45-61.
44. Highfield, T. and Leaver, T. (2015). A methodology for mapping Instagram hashtags. First Monday, 20(1): 1-11.
45. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Hirschman, A. O. (1986). Rival Views of Market Society. New York: Viking.
47. Hollenbeck, C. R. and Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Consumer activism on the internet: The role of anti-brand communities. ACR North American Advances, 33: 479-485.
48. Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of consumer research, 29(1): 70-90.
49. Hon, L. (2016). Social media framing within the Million Hoodies movement for justice. Public Relations Review, 42(1): 9-19.
50. Hwang, C., Lee, Y., Diddi, S. and Karpova, E. (2016). Don’t buy this jacket. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(4): 435-452.
51. Hyman, L. and Tohill, J. (2017). Shopping for change: consumer activism and the possibilities of purchasing power. Cornell University Press, p.392.
52. Jacobson, C., Katalin Abdallah, L., Liasse, D. and Lund, E. (2018). Femvertising and its effects on brand image: A study of men’s attitude towards brands pursuing brand activism in their advertising. Unpublished Master Thesis. Lund School of Economics and Management.
53. Joyce, M. C. (2010). Digital activism decoded: The new mechanics of change. New York: IDEA.
54. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and change, 30(3): 435-464.
55. Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world unite: The challenges. Business Horizons, 53(1): 59-68.
56. Karagöz, K. (2013). Yeni medya çağında dönüşen toplumsal hareketler ve dijital aktivizm hareketleri. İletişim ve diplomasi, 1(1): 131-156.
57. Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. First Edition. NY: Cornell University Press.
58. Keeley, M. and Graham, J. W. (1991). Exit, voice, and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5): 349-355.
59. Kirkpatrick, G. (2008). Technology and Social Power. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
60. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C. and John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3): 92-109.
61. Kotler, P. (1971). What consumerism means for marketers. Harvard business review, 50(3): 48-57.
62. Kotler, P. and Sarkar C. (2017). “Finally, Brand Activism!” https://www.marketingjournal.org/finally-brand-activism-philip-kotler-and-christian-sarkar/ asp (22 January 2021).
63. Kozinets, R. V. (2014). Social brand engagement: A new idea. Marketing Intelligence Review, 6(2): 8-15.
64. Kozinets, R. V. and Handelman, J. (1998). Ensouling consumption: a netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. Advances in Consumer Research Volume, 25: 475-480.
65. Kozinets, R. V. and Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of consumer research, 31(3): 691-704.
66. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T. and Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist, 53(9): 1017-1031.
67. Krishnamurthy, S. and Kucuk, S. U. (2009). Anti-branding on the internet. Journal of Business Research, 62(11): 1119-1126.
68. Kristofferson, K., White, K. and Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6): 1149-1166.
69. Kubiak, K. and Ouda, S. (2020). Brand Activism-the Battle Between Authenticity and Consumer Scepticism. Unpublished Master Thesis. Lund University.
70. Lee, Y. H. and Hsieh, G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 811-820.
71. Lincoln, N. D., Travers, C., Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2002). The meaning of empowerment: The interdisciplinary etymology of a new management concept. International journal of management reviews, 4(3): 271-290.
72. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry, 289(331): 289-327.
73. Lusch, R. F. and Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of marketing, 60(4): 19-38.
74. Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L. (2019). Brand activism. Communication & Society, 32(4): 343-359.
75. McCafferty, D. (2011). Activism Vs. Slacktivism. Communications of the ACM, 54 (12): 17-19.
76. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Vol. 13. Sage Publications Inc.
77. Merriam-Webster (2017). “Stay Woke,” Merriam-Webster Dictionary,https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/woke-meaning-origin asp (22 January 2021).
78. Minocher, X. (2019). Online consumer activism: Challenging companies with Change. org. New Media & Society, 21(3): 620-638
79. Montecchi, M. and Nobbs, K. (2017). Let it go: consumer empowerment and user-generated content–an exploratory study of contemporary fashion marketing practices in the digital age. Digital Marketing and Consumer Engagement, 294-317.
80. Moorman, C. (2020). Commentary: Brand Activism in a Political World. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4): 388-392.
81. Morozov, E. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism.https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/ asp ( 22 January 2021).
82. Morozov, E. (2010). The Internet https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/04/26/think-again-the-internet/ asp (22 January 2021).
83. Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: How not to Liberate the World. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jan/09/net-delusion-morozov-review asp (22 January 2021).
84. Morozov E. (2012). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. First edition. New York: PublicAffairs.
85. Muniz, A. M. and O'guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4): 412-432.
86. Ozanne, J. L. and Murray, J. B. (1995). Uniting critical theory and public policy to create the reflexively defiant consumer. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(4): 516-525.
87. Paktin, S. (2013). Change.org: Katılımcı Demokrasi ve Aktivizm. http://yesildusunce.org/dl/uploads/INTERAKTIVIST-WEB.pdf#page=92 asp (22 January 2021).
88. Papaoikonomou, E. and Alarcon, A. (2017). Revisiting consumer empowerment: An exploration of ethical consumption communities. Journal of Macromarketing, 37(1): 40-56.
89. Park, D. H., Lee, J. and Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International journal of electronic commerce, 11(4): 125-148.
90. Parr, B. (2010). ‘Twitter Improves Trending Topic Algorithm: Bye, Bieber!’. https://mashable.com/2010/05/14/twitter-improves-trending-topic-algorithm-bye-bye-bieber/ asp (22 January 2021).
91. Peñaloza, L. and Price, L. L. (1993). Consumer resistance: a conceptual overview. Advances in Consumer Research, 20: 123-128.
92. Ping Jr, R. A. (1993). The effects of satisfaction and structural constraints on retailer exiting, voice, loyalty, opportunism, and neglect. Journal of retailing, 69(3): 320-352.
93. Pitt, L. F., Berthon, P. R., Watson, R. T. and Zinkhan, G. M. (2002). The Internet and the birth of real consumer power. Business Horizons, 45(4): 7-14.
94. Pitt, L., Berthon, P. and Campbell C. (2008). When Customers Create the Ad. California management review. 50: 6-30.
95. Poell, T. and Van Dijck, J. (2015). Social Media and Activist Communication. The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, 527-537.
96. Putnam, T. and Muck, T. (1991). Wielding the boycott weapon for social change. Business and Social Review, 78: 5-8.
97. Ramesh, K., Saha, R., Goswami, S. and Dahiya, R. (2019). Consumer's response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2): 377-387.
98. Rezabakhsh, B., Bornemann, D., Hansen, U. and Schrader, U. (2006). Consumer power: a comparison of the old economy and the Internet economy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 29(1): 3-36.
99. Rishe, P. (2018). Nike's reward from using Kaepemick will exceed risk because it knows its demo. https://bit.ly/3sQXO0o asp (22 January 2021).
100. Romani, S., Grappi, S., Zarantonello, L. and Bagozzi, R. P. (2015). The revenge of the consumer! How brand moral violations lead to consumer anti-brand activism. Journal of Brand Management, 22(8): 658-672.
101. Rudolfsdottir, A. G. and Jóhannsdóttir, Á. (2018). Fuck patriarchy! An analysis of digital mainstream media discussion of the# freethenipple activities in Iceland in March 2015. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1): 133-151.
102. Sarkar, C. and Kotler, P. (2018). Brand Activism. From Purpose to Action. USA: Idea Bite Press.
103. Saxton, G. D. and Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 43(5): 850-868.
104. Scholz, T. (2010). Infrastructure: Its Transformations and Effect on Digital Activism chapter in Digital Activism Decoded The New Mechanics of Change. New York: IDEBATE Press.
105. Schumann, S. and Klein, O. (2015). Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of low‐threshold online collective actions on offline participation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3): 308-322.
106. Selleck, L. G. (2010). Pretty in Pink: The Susan G. Komen Network and the Branding of the Breast Cancer Cause. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(3): 119-138.
107. Shetty, A. S., Venkataramaiah, N. B. and Anand, K. (2019). Brand activism and millennials: an empirical investigation into the perception of millennials towards brand activism. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4): 163.
108. Shulman, S. W. (2009). The case against mass e‐mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in US federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet,1(1): 23-53.
109. Siano, A., Vollero, A. and Palazzo, M. (2011). Exploring the role of online consumer empowerment in reputation building: research questions and hypotheses. Journal of brand management, 19(1): 57-71.
110. Singh, J. (1990). Voice, exit, and negative word-of-mouth behaviors: An investigation across three service categories. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 18(1): 1-15.
111. Singh, J. and Wilkes, R. E. (1996). When consumers complain: A path analysis of the key antecedents of consumer complaint response estimates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4): 350.
112. Sivitanides, M. and Shah, V. (2011). The era of digital activism. In Conference for Information Systems Applied Research, 4: 1842.
113. Skoric, M. M. (2012). What is slack about slacktivism. Methodological and conceptual issues in cyber activism research, 77 (7): 7-92.
114. Smith, A. (2017). Pepsi Pulls Controversial Kendall Jenner Ad After Outcry. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/pepsi-ad-kendall-jenner-echoes-black-lives-matter-sparks-anger-n742811 asp (22 January 2021).
115. Snow, D. (2001). Collective identity and expressive forms. Center for the Study of Democracy, 196–254.
116. Sobande, F. (2019). Woke-washing:“Intersectional” femvertising and branding “woke” bravery. European Journal of Marketing, 54 (11): 2723-2745.
117. Solis, B. (2010). Engage: The complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
118. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 21(3): 491-503.
119. Stewart, K. (1998). The customer exit process-a review and research agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(4): 235-250.
120. Suwana, F. (2020). What motivates digital activism? The case of the Save KPK movement in Indonesia. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9): 1295-1310.
121. Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A. and Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelgänger brand image. Journal of marketing, 70(1): 50-64.
122. Turley, E. and Fisher, J. (2018). Tweeting back while shouting back: Social media and feminist activism. Feminism & psychology, 28(1): 128-132.
123. Tuten, T. L. and Solomon, M. R. (2015). Social Media Marketing. Second Edition. UK:SAGE Publications Ltd.
124. Urban, G. L. (2004). The emerging era of customer advocacy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2): 77.
125. Varman, R. and Vikas, R. M. (2007). Rising markets and failing health: An inquiry into subaltern health care consumption under neoliberalism. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(2): 162-172.
126. Vegh, S., Ayers, M. D. and McCaughey, M. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The Case of Cyberprotests against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey, & M. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 71-95). New York: Routledge.
127. Veil, S. R., Reno, J., Freihaut, R. and Oldham, J. (2015). Online activists vs. Kraft foods: A case of social media hijacking. Public Relations Review, 41(1): 03-108.
128. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N. and Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3): 107-114.
129. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A. and Kemper, J. (2018). Woke washing: What happens when marketing communications don't match corporate practice. The Conversation.https://bit.ly/2YaLqu8 asp (22 January 2021).
130. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A. and Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing?. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4): 444-460.
131. Wallendorf, M. and Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. ACR special volumes, 69-84.
132. Weinberger, D. (2010). Internet Exceptionalism. https://weinberger.org/writings/ asp (22 January 2021).
133. Weinzimmer, L. G. and Esken, C. A. (2016). Risky business: Taking a stand on social issues. Business Horizons, 59(3): 331-337.
134. Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M. C. (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California management review, 43(2): 34-55.