FİRMA YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ VE İHRACAT PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ ÜZERİNDE REKABET YOĞUNLUĞUNUN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 77 - 98, 01.06.2018

Fatih Koç Lütfi Biçimveren Binnaz Çinar

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, firma yenilikçiliği ile ihracat performansı arasındaki ilişki üzerinde rekabet yoğunluğunun düzenleyici etkisinin var olup olmadığının incelenmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, ilgili değişkenleri içeren bir model geliştirilmiştir. Araştırma amacına ulaşmak için Balıkesir, Bursa ve Kayseri illeri Organize Sanayi Bölgelerinde faaliyette bulunan ve ihracat yapan firmalar üzerinde anket yöntemi ile ihtiyaç duyulan veriler toplanmıştır. Toplam 321 anket dikkate alınarak analizler yapılmıştır. Analizler, SPSS ve AMOS programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, rekabet yoğunluğunun firma yenilikçiliği ile ihracat performansı arasındaki ilişki üzerinde düzenleyici etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rekabet yoğunluğu, firma yenilikçiliği, ihracat performansı, aracı etki

MODERATOR EFFECT OF COMPETITIVE INTENSITY ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM INNOVATION AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE

Öz

This study aims examining whether competitive intensity has moderator effect on relationship between firm innovation and export performance. In accordance with this purpose, a model was developed including related variables. In order to achieve this aim, the data was collected from firms that are operating and exporting in Balıkesir, Bursa and Kayseri Organized Industrial Zone using survey method. The analyses has been carried out with 321 valid questionares. SPSS and AMOS package programs have been used in the analyses. As a result of this study, the moderator effect of competitive intensity has been detected on relationship between firm innovation and export performance

Anahtar Kelimeler

Competitive intensity, firm İnnovation, export performance, moderation effect

Kaynakça

• Aaby, N. E. ve Slater, S. F. (1989). Management Influences on Export Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature 1978-88. International Marketing Review, 6(4), 7-26.
• Adnan, Z., Abdullah, H. ve Ahmad, J. (2015). Assessing the Moderating Effect of Competition Intensity on HRM Practices and Organizational Performance Link: The Experience of Malaysian R&D Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 462-467.
• Al-Aali., Lim, J.- S., Khan, T. ve Khurshid, M. (2013). Marketing Capability and Export Performance: The Moderating Effect of Export Performance. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manage, 44(3), 59-70.
• Ambler, T., Styles, C. ve Xiucun, W. (1999). The Effect of Channel Relationships and Guanxi On the Performance of Inter-Province Export Ventures in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(7), 5–87.
• Angelo, A. (2012). Innovation and Export Performance: A Study of Italian Hightech SMEs. Journal of Management, 16(3), 393-423.
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). Amos 21 User’s Guide, (Computer Software and Manual). New York, NY: IBM.
• Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. A Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, 609-626.
• Bakaouros, Y. ve Samara, E. (2010). Innovation Management Techniques: A Strategic Tool for SMEs in An Innovative Region. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2(2), 81-90.
• Bayram, N. (2016). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: AMOS Uygulamaları, Ezgi Kitapevi, 3. Baskı.
• Beise-Zee, R. ve Rammer, C. (2006). Local User-Producer Interaction in Innovation and Export Performance of Firms. Small Business Economics, 27(2), 207-222.
• Bengtsson, M. ve Solvell, O. (2004). Climate of Competition, Clusters and Innovative Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(3), 225-244.
• Bradley, F. (1999). International Marketing Strategy, Prentice Hall, UK. Branch, B. (1974). Research and Development Activity and Profitability: A Distributed Log Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 999–1011.
• Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S. ve Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
• Cavuşgil, S.T. ve Zou, S. (1994). Marketing Strategy Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1–21.
• Gaskin, J. (2011). Retrieved From. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = JkZGWUUjdLg.
• Gaskin,J. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Confirmatory_ Factor_Analysis. Erişim Tarihi: 12.07.2017.
• Gkypali, A., Rafailidis, A. ve Tsekouras, K. (2015). Innovation and Export Performance: Do Young and Mature Innovative Firms Differ? Eurasian Business Review, 5(2), 397-415.
• Guan, J. ve Ma, N. (2003). Innovation Capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747.
• Gündoğdu, F. ve Sunay, H. (2012). İnovasyon ve Türk Spor Yönetiminde İnovasyon Uygulamaları. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2),61-66.
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. ve Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Pearson Education.
• Hurley, R. F. ve Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
• İslamoğlu, A. H. ve Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yönetemleri. Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Ito, K. ve Pucik, V. (1993). R&D Spending, Domestic Competition, and Export Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms. Management Science, 43(5), 610-622.
• Jermias, J. (2006). Competitive Intensity as a Quası Moderator of The Relationship Between Innovative Efforts and Performance, Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December, 8(3), 281–299.
• Kaplan, M. (2013). İhracat Performansına Etki Eden Faktörler ve Pazarlama Planlama Yeteneği ile İhracat Performansı İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştrma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale.
• Kırbach, M. ve Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Innovation and Export Performance: Adjustment and Remaining Differences in East and West German Manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(5), 435- 457.
• Konsolas, I. (1999). The Competitive Advantage of Nations: The Case of Greece. Retrieved From. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2514/1/U615463.pdf.
• Korkmaz, S., Ermeç, A. ve Yücedağ, N. (2009). İşletmelerin Yenilikçi Kabiliyetleri ve İhracat Performanslarına Etkileri, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 83-104.
• Kumar, N. ve Siddharthan, N. (1994). Technology, Firm Size and Export Behaviour in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Enterprises. Journal of Development Studies, 31(2), 289-309.
• Küçük ve Orta Büyüklükteki İşletmelerin Tanımı, Nitelikleri ve Sınıflandırılması Hakkında Yönetmelik,http://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/ Mevzuat/KOB%C4%B0’lerin_Tanimi,_Yonetmelik.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 13.07.2017.
• Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L.A. ve Bourgault, M., (1998). R&D-Related Capabilities as Determinants of Export Performance. Small Business Economics, 10(4), 365-377.
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound Open Innovation and Its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences. R&D Management, 39(4) 317-330.
• Ma, Hao. (2004), Toward Global Competitive Advantage Creation, Competition, Cooperation and Competition. Management Decision, 42(7), 907- 924.
• Madsen, T. K. (1989). Successful Export Marketing Management: Some Empirical Evidence. International Marketing Review, 6(44), 41-57.
• Martin, S. ve Javalgi, R. (2016). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Marketing Capabilities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity on Latin American Interational New Ventures. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2040-2051.
• Morgan, N.A., Zou, S., Vorhies, D.W. ve Katsikeas, C.S. (2003). Experiential and Informational Knowledge, Architectual Marketing Capabilities, and the Adaptive Performance of Export Ventures: A Cross-National Study. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 287-321.
• Nakip, M. (2006). Pazarlama Araştırmaları Teknikler ve SPSS Destekli Uygulamalar, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Nassimbeni, G. (2001). Technology, Innovation Capacity, and The Export Attitude of Small Manufacturing Firms: A Logit/Tobit Model. Research Policy, 30(2), 245–262.
• OECD. (2005). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Retrieved Haziran 06, 2017, from OECD: http://www. oecd.org/sti/inno/2367580.pdf.
• Polat, C. ve Avşar, R. (2015). Yoğun Rekabet Ortamında Pazarlama Stratejileri: Deterjan Sektöründe Bir Örnek Olay Çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 203-242.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. NewYork: The Free Pres.
• Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
• Rejeb, H., Guimaraes, L. ve Boly, V. (2008). Measuring Innovation Best Practies: Improvement of an Innovation Index Integrating Threshold and Synergy Effects. Technovation, 28(12), 838-854.
• Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, Firm Size and Innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141-153.
• Roper, S. ve Love, J. (2002). Innovation and Export Performance: Evidence from UK and German Manufacturing Plants. Research Policy, 31(7), 1087-1102.
• Ruttan, V. (1997). Induced Innovation, Evalutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources. of Technical Change. Economic Journal, 107(444), 1520-1529.
• Shoham, A. (1998). Export Performance: A Conceptualization and Empirical Assessment. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 59-81.
• Sterlacchini A. (1999). Do Innovative Activities Matter to Small Firms in nonR&D-Intensive Industries? An Application to Export Performance, Research Policy, 28(8), 819-832.
• Su, K. T. (2003). Rekabet Hukukunda Teşebbüslerin Hakim Durumunun Belirlenmesinde Pazar Gücünün Ölçülmesi, Rekabet Kurumu, Ankara.
• Torlak, Ö., Kula, V. ve Özdemir, Ş. (2007). Türk İşletmelerinin İhracat Performansı Belirleyicileri. Gazi Ünivrsitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 103-114.
• Tsai, K.H. ve Hsu, T.T. (2012). Linking Cross-Functional Collaboration, Innovation Performance, and Competitive Intensity: Towards a Mediated Moderation Perspective. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(1), 113–126.
• Tsai, K. ve Hsu, T. (2014). Cross-Functional Collaboration, Competitive Intensity, Knowledge Integration Mechanisms, and New Product Performance: A Mediated Moderation Model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 293-303.
• Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Review of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.
• Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and Export Behaviour at the Firm Level. Research Policy, 26(7), 829-841.
• Willmore, L. (1992). Transnational and Foreign Trade: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Studies, 28(2), 314-335.
• Zamora, E. G., Benito, O. G. ve Gallego, P. M. (2013). Organizational and Environmental Factors as Moderators of the Relationship Between Multidimensional Innovation and Performance, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 15(2), 224–244.