Yatırımcının Yargılamaya İlişkin Beklentileri: Osmanlı Kapitülasyonları’nı Güncel Uluslararası Ekonomi Hukuku Açısından Okumak

Öz

Günümüzde uluslararası yatırım hukuku, yabancı sermayeye yönelik hukuki güvencelerin ulusal yargı sisteminin ötesine taşınmasına dayanır. Ancak bu tür güvenceler yalnızca modern döneme özgü değildir; tarih boyunca devletler yabancı sermayeyi teşvik etmek için benzer mekanizmalar geliştirmiştir. Osmanlı kapitülasyonları, bu bağlamda yabancı yatırımcılara tanınan maddi ve usulî güvencelerin erken bir örneğini sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, kapitülas-yonların yabancılara konsolosluk mahkemeleri, karma komisyonlar ve tahkim benzeri yollarla Osmanlı hukukunun sınırlarını aşan çözümler sağladığını ve bu yönüyle günümüz yatırım uyuşmazlıklarının çözüm yöntemleriyle işlevsel paralellikler taşıdığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, en çok kayrılan ulus (MFN) hükümleri ele alınmakta; Osmanlı uygulamasında bu hükümlerin tek taraflı ve geniş kapsamlı uygulanmasının yabancılar üzerindeki yargı yetkisini zamanla zayıflattığı tespit edilmektedir. Çalışma aynı zamanda bireylerin daha avantajlı statü elde etmek için farklı siyasi otoritelerin himayesine geçme uygulamasını (“nationality shopping”) incelemekte ve bunun Osmanlı döneminde yabancı bayrak altında seyretme veya “protégé” sistemi aracılığıyla gerçekleştiğini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, Osmanlı kapitülasyonları ile modern uluslararası ekonomi hukukundaki paralellikler ortaya konmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• tahkim
• yatırım tahkimi
• uyuşmazlık çözüm mekanizmaları
• kapitülasyonlar
• uluslararası ticaret hukuku
• uluslararası yatırım hukuku

Investor’s Quest for Judicial Security: Reading Ottoman Capitulations from the Contemporary Understanding of International Economic Law

Öz

International investment law relies on extending legal protections to foreign capital beyond the national judicial system. Such protection is not, however, exclusive to the contemporary era; throughout history, States have deve-loped similar mechanisms to promote foreign capital flow. Ottoman capitulations provide an early example of the substantive and procedural guarantees granted to foreign investors. This article demonstrates that capitulations provided solutions that exceeded the limitations of Ottoman law through consular courts, mixed commissions, and arbitration, and in this respect, display functional parallels with contemporary investment dispute resolution methods. This article further examines the most-favoured-nation (MFN) clauses and observes that, in the Ottoman practice, the unilateral and extensive application of these clauses gradually weakened the Ottoman Empire’s jurisdiction over foreigners. The article also examines the practice of individuals seeking a more advantageous status under the protection of different political authorities (“nationality shopping”), noting that in the Ottoman period this was implemented by shipping under foreign flags or through the “protégé” system. Ultimately, the article highlights the functional parallels between Ottoman capitulations and modern international economic law.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ottoman Capitulations
• International Investment Law
• International Economic Law
• WTO
• Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (MFN)
• Nationality Shopping
• Judicial Privileges

Kaynakça

1. Abelous F, L’évolution de La Turquie Dans Ses Rapports Avec Les Étrangers (Pédone 1928).
2. Abi-Chahla H, L’extinction Des Capitulations En Turquie et Dans Les Régions Arabes (Picart 1924).
3. Ahmed Réchid, ‘La Condition Des Étrangers Dans La République de Turquie” (1933) 46 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 165-227.
4. Ali Şahbaz, Mufassal Hukuk-i Düvel, Cilt II (Bağdadlıyan 1325).
5. Aristarchi Bey (Grégoire), Législation Ottomane, Ou Recueil Des Lois, Règlements, Ordonnances, Traités, Capitulations et Autres Documents de l’Empire Ottoman, Deuxième Partie, Droit Public Intérieur (Démétrius Nikolaidès ed, Bureau du Journal Thraky 1874).
6. Arminjon P, Étrangers et Protégés Dans l’Empire Ottoman, Vol I (A Chevalier-Maresq 1903).
7. Artunç C, ‘The Protégé System and Beratlı Merchants in the Ottoman Empire: The Price of Legal Institutions’ (2013) http://www.levantineheritage.com/pdf/The-Protege-System-Cihan-Artunc.pdf.
8. Atatürk K, A Speech Delivered by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, 1927 (Ministry of Education Printing Plant 1963).

9. Bağış Aİ, Osmanlı Ticaretinde Gayri Müslimler (2nd edn, Turhan Kitabevi 1998).
10. Baskıcı MM, ‘Lozan Barış Andlaşmasının Ekonomik ve Mali Hükümleri’ in Çağrı Erhan (ed), Yaşayan Lozan (Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları 2003) 263-391.
11. Baumgartner J, Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2016).
12. Belin FA, Des Capitulations et Des Traités de La France En Orient (Challamel Ainé 1870).
13. Berkes N, Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma (Yapı Kredi Yayınları 2003).
14. Bilsel MC, Lozan, Cilt II (Ahmet İhsan Matbaası 1933).
15. Bonfils H, Manuel de Droit International Public (1912).
16. Brown PM, Foreigners in Turkey: Their Juridical Status (Princeton University Press 1914).
17. Cardini F, Europa e Islam, Storia Di Un Malinteso (Laterza 2003).
18. Cavarretta G, La Clausola Della Nazione Più Favorita (Alberto Reber 1906).
19. Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States (ICSID Convention) (concluded on 18 March 1965, entered into force on 14 October 1966), 575 UNTS 159.
20. Cole T, ‘The Boundaries of Most Favoured Nation Treatment in International Investment Law’ (2012) 33 Michigan Journal of International Law 537-586.
21. Dainese v Hale 91 US Reports 13 (1875).
22. Dainese v United States 15 Court of Claims Report 64 (1879).
23. Davison R, ‘The Turks in History’ Essays in Ottoman and Turkish History, 1774-1923, The Impact of the West, Roderic Davison (Saqi Books 1990).
24. de Clerq J (ed), ‘Traité de Paix de 1802’, Recueil des Traités de France, vol I (Amyot 1864).
25. de Groot AH, ‘The Historical Development of the Capitulatory Regime in the Ottoman Middle East from the Fifteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries’ (2003) 83 Oriente Moderno 575-604.
26. de Testa I, Recueil Des Traités de La Porte Ottomane Avec Les Puissances Étrangères Depuis Le Premier Traité Conclu En 1536, Entre Suléyman I et François I, Jusqu’à Nos Jours, Vol I (Amyot 1864).
27. —— (ed), ‘Mémoire Du Gouvernement Ottoman, En Date d’avril 1869 (Mouharrem 1286),” Recueil des traités de la Porte ottomane avec les puissances étrangères depuis le premier traité conclu en 1536, entre Suléyman I et François I, jusqu’à nos jours, Vol VII (Amyot 1892).
28. ‘Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses with Commentaries (1978) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission 16.
29. Duparc P (ed), ‘Mémoire Du Roy Pour Servir d’instruction Au Sieur de La Haye Vantelay s’en Allant à Constantinople En Qualité d’ambassadeur de Sa Majesté Vers Le Grand Seigneur (1665)’, Recueil des instructions données aux ambassadeurs et ministres de France, XXIX, Turquie (Centre national de recherche scientifique 1969).
30. Düstur, I. Tertip, C. I (Matbaa-i Amire 1289).
31. Düstur, I. Tertip, C. IV (Matbaa-i Amire 1296).
32. Düstur, III. Tertip, C. V (Necmi İstiklal Matbaası 1931).
33. El-Gazzi K, Nahr El-Dahab Fi Ta’rih Halab, Vol III (1926).
34. Eldem E, ‘Capitulations and Western Trade’ in Suraiya N Faroqhi (ed), The Cambridge History of Turkey, Vol 3: The Later Ottoman Empire - 1603-1839 (Cambridge University Press 2006) 283-335.
35. Féraud-Giraud L-J-D, La Juridiction Française Dans Les Échelles Du Levant et de Barbarie… (A Durand 1859).
36. Fleet K, ‘The Treaty of 1387 between Murād I and the Genoese’ (1993) 56 Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 13-33.
37. ——, ‘Turkish-Latin Diplomatic Relations in the Fourteenth Century: The Case of the Consul’ (2003) 83 Oriente Moderno 605-611.
38. Frazee CA, Catholics and Sultans, The Church and the Ottoman Empire, 1453-1923 (Cambridge University Press 1983).
39. ‘From Williams to Cass (17.9.1860)’, The United States Archives, Legations, Dispatches, Turkey, Vol 16.
40. Gatteschi D, Manuale Di Diritto Pubblico e Privato Ottomano (Posta Europea di V Minasi e c 1865).
41. Guberman S, ‘The Development of the Law in Israel: The First 50 Years’ (2000) accessed 1 July 2020.
42. Guéna P, ‘Qui a lu les capitulations? Note à partir d’un copie crétoise de 1454’ (2022) 53 Turcica 115-135.
43. Hasan Fehmi, Telhis-i Hukuk-u Düvel (Matbaa-i Osmaniye 1300).
44. Hathaway IF, ‘Layers of protection: Safe conduct practices and diplomacy in the sixteenth-century mediterranean’ (2022) 53 Turcica 175-203.
45. Hrand Asadur, Halil Cemaleddin, Ecanibin Memalik-i Osmaniye’de Haiz Oldukları İmtiyazat-ı Adliye (Hukuk Matbaası 1330-1332).
46. Herodotus, The History of Herodotus, Book II (GC Macaulay ed, 2008) http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2707/2707-h/2707-h.htm#linknote-331.
47. Hornbeck SK, ‘The Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’ (1909) 3 American Journal of International Law 395 https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002930000250756/type/journal_article.
48. İbrahim A, ‘Mecelle’nin Orta Doğu Devletlerine Tesiri’ (2017) 1 Türkiye İlahiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi 8-18.
49. İnalcık H, ‘Imtiyazat’, Encyclopaedia of Islam, Vol III (2nd edn, Brill 1986) 1178-1189.
50. ——, Ottoman Empire, the Classical Age, 1300-1600 (Phoenix 1998).
51. Ismet Pasha, ‘December 2’, 1922 Records of Proceedings and Draft Terms of Peace. Presented to Parliament by the Command of His Majesty (His Majesty’s Stationery Office 1923).
52. Kaleağası B, Dünya Nasıl Değişiyor? Türkiye Nereye Gidiyor? (Doğan Kitap 2011).
53. Kançal S, ‘La Conquête Du Marché Ottoman Par Le Capitalisme Industriel Concurrentiel (1838-1881)’ Colloques internationaux du CNRS, No. 601- Economie et Sociétés dans l’Empire Ottoman (fin du XVIIIe—début du XXe siècle) (Centre national de recherche scientifique 1983) 355-409.
54. Kandelafte JS, L’avenir Réservé Au Régime Des Capitulations En Turquie (1911).
55. Kazgan G, Tanzimattan 21. Yüzyıla Türkiye Ekonomisi, Birinci Küreselleşmeden İkinci Küreselleşmeye (2nd edn, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 2006).
56. Külünk ME, Kapitülasyonların Kaldırılması (Yeditepe Yayınevi 2011).
57. Kuneralp S (ed), ‘Convention Consulaire Signée Avec l’Autriche-Hongrie (Vienne, 12 Mars 1918); Convention Relative à La Protection Judiciaire et Au Concours Réciproque Entre Les Autorités Judiciaires En Matière Civile Signée Avec l’Autriche-Hongrie, (Vienne, 12 Mars 1918)’, Recueil des traités, Conventions, Protocoles, Arrangements et Déclarations signés entre l’Empire Ottoman et les Puissances Etrangères, 1903-1922, Volume II, 1917-1922 (Isis 2000).
58. —— (ed), ‘Letters of 26 September and 5 December 1914’, Recueil des traités, Conventions, Protocoles, Arrangements et Déclarations signés entre l’Empire Ottoman et les Puissances Etrangères, 1903-1922, Volume I, 1903-1916 (Isis 2000).
59. —— (ed), Recueil Des Traités, Conventions, Protocoles, Arrangements et Déclarations Signés Entre l’Empire Ottoman et Les Puissances Etrangères, 1903-1922, Volume I, 1903-1916 (Isis 2000).
60. ——, Recueil Des Traités, Conventions, Protocoles, Arrangements et Déclarations Signés Entre l’Empire Ottoman et Les Puissances Etrangères, 1903-1922, Volume II, 1917-1922 (Isis 2000).
61. Kumrular Ö, Avrupa’da Türk Düşmanlığının Kökeni-Türk Korkusu (Doğan Kitap 2008).
62. Kuneralp S and Öktem E, Chambre Des Conseillers Légistes de La Sublime Porte: Rapports, Avis et Consultations Sur La Condition Juridique Des Ressortissants Étrangers, Le Statut Des Communatés Non Musulmanes et Les Relations Internationales de l’Empire Ottoman (1864-1912) (Les éditions Isis 2012).
63. Kürkçüoğlu Ö and Erhan Ç, ‘Lozan Gelişmeleri’ in Çağrı Erhan (ed), Yaşayan Lozan (Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı 2003) 17-98.
64. ‘L’abolition Des Capitulations et Ses Conséquences’ (1914) 21 Revue générale de droit international public 487.
65. ‘Le Traité de Paris du 30 Mars 1856 et Les Conférences de Londres de 1871’, Archives diplomatiques 1873, tome III (Amyot 1873).
66. Lewis B, The Emergence of Modern Turkey (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 1968).
67. Mahmoud Essad, Du Régime Des Capitulations Ottomanes : Leur Caractère Juridique d’après l’histoire et Les Textes (Fratelli Haim 1928).
68. Mandelstam A, ‘Preface’ in Léon Ostroróg (ed), Pour la Réforme de la Justice Ottomane (Pédone 1912).
69. ——, Le Sort de l’Empire Ottoman (Payot et Cie 1917).
70. Matuz J, ‘À Propos de La Validité Des Capitulations de 1536 Entre l’Empire Ottoman et La France’ (1992) 24 Turcica 183-191.
71. McNair AD, The Law of Treaties (Clarendon Press 1962).
72. Mikonios G, Les Consuls En Orient et Les Tribunaux Mixtes (Braun 1881).
73. Muahedat Mecmuası, Vol II (Hakikat Matbaası 1294).
74. Muahedat Mecmuası, Vol III (Ceride-i Askeriye Matbaası 1297).
75. Mumcu A, Osmanlı Devletinde Siyasen Katl (Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları 1963).
76. ——, Osmanlı Devletinde Rüşvet (Özellikle Adli Rüşvet) (Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları 1969).
77. ‘Treaty on European Union- Joining the EU’ https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:l14536 accessed 28 September 2020.
78. Noradounghian GE (ed), Recueil d’actes Internationaux de l’Empire Ottoman, Vol I (Pichon 1897).
79. —— (ed), ‘The 1746 Commercial Capitulations with Denmark’, Recueil d’actes internationaux de l’Empire ottoman, Vol I (Pichon 1897).
80. —— (ed), ‘The 1761 Capitulations or Treaty of Friendship and Commerce with Prussia’, Recueil d’actes internationaux de l’Empire ottoman, Vol I (Pichon 1897).
81. —— (ed), ‘The 1783 Convention of Commerce and Navigation with Russia’, Recueil d’actes internationaux de l’Empire ottoman, Vol I (Pichon 1897).
82. —— (ed), ‘The 1784 Exchange of Letters with Austria’, Recueil d’actes internationaux de l’Empire ottoman, Vol I (Pichon 1897).
83. —— (ed), Recueil d’actes Internationaux de l’Empire Ottoman, Vol II (Pichon 1900).
84. —— (ed), ‘The 1830 Commerce and Navigation Treaty Between the United States of America and the Ottoman Empire’, Recueil d’actes internationaux de l’Empire ottoman, Vol II (Pichon 1900).
85. —— (ed), Recueil d’actes Internationaux de l’Empire Ottoman, Vol III (Pichon 1902).
86. —— (ed), Recueil d’actes Internationaux de l’Empire Ottoman, Vol IV (Pichon 1903).
87. Nys E, Le Droit International, Les Principes, Les Théories, Les Faits, Vol II (Alfred Castaigne, Albert Fontemoing 1905).
88. Oppenheim L, International Law, A Treatise, Vol 1: Peace (2nd edn, Longmans, Green and Co 1912).
89. Orakhelashvili A, ‘International Law and Geopolitics: One Object, Conflicting Legitimacies?’ (2008) 39 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 155-204.
90. Oran B, ‘Lausanne Barış Antlaşması’ in Baskın Oran (ed), Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşı’ndan Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar (İletişim 2002).
91. Ottoman Senate, ‘50th Session of 27 March 1333 (1917)’, Proceedings from Year 3, Vol II.
92. Öktem E, ‘Le Traité de Paris de 1856 Revisité à Son 150e Anniversaire: Quelques Aspects Juridiques Internationaux’ in Gilbert Ameil, Isabelle Nathan and Georges Soutou (eds), Le congrès de Paris (1856) un événement fondateur (Direction des archives, ministère français de l’Europe et des Affaires étrangères 2009).
93. _____, ‘La clausola della nazione più favorita nelle capitolazioni ottomane: Genesi, tipologia, patologia’ (2022) 105 Rivista di diritto internazionale, 483.
94. _____, ‘Küçük Kaynarca: Miti e (talvolta mitopoietiche) demistificazioni’ (2025) Nuova rivista storica, 25-52.
95. Panaite V, The Ottoman Law of War and Peace : The Ottoman Empire and Tribute Payers (East European Monographs 2000).
96. Pears E, ‘Turkish Capitulations and the Status of British and Other Foreign Subjects Residing in Turkey” (1905) 21 Law Quarterly Review 408-425.
97. ——, Turkey and Its People (Methuen & Co 1911).
98. Pedani Fabris MP, La dimora della pace: Considerazioni sulle capitolazioni tra i paesi islamici e l’Europa, Quaderni di Studi Arabi (Studi e testi, 2, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, Dipartimento di Scienze Storico-Archeologiche e Orientalistiche, 1996).
99. Pélissié du Rausas G, Le Régime Des Capitulations Dans l’Empire Ottoman (Arthur Rousseau ed, 1902).
100. Picard MM, ‘Vers La Fin Des Capitulations’ (1923) 50 Journal du droit international 55-63.
101. Poulton E and others, ‘Corporate Restructuring and Investment Treaty Protections’ (BIICL Report on Empirical Study, 2020) https://www.biicl.org/documents/89_isds-corporate-restructuring.pdf accessed 29 September 2020.
102. PRO and FO, ‘Letter from Charles Arbuthnot to Charles James Fox” (1806).
103. ——, ‘From Stevens to Canning’, 195/294 (1848).
104. ‘Records of Proceedings and Draft Terms of Peace,” Lausanne Conference on Near Eastern Affairs 1922-1923 (His Majesty’s Stationery Office 1923).
105. Renton AW, ‘The Revolt against the Capitulatory System’ (1933) 15 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 212 [suspicious link removed].
106. Said Halim Pacha, Said Paşa’nın Hatıratı, Vol I (Sabah Matbaası 1328).
107. ——, ‘La Turquie et Le Califat’ in Said Halim Pacha (ed), L’Empire ottoman et la Guerre mondiale (Isis 2000) 97-110.
108. Salmon J (ed), Dictionnaire de Droit International Public (Bruylant 2001).
109. Schwarzenberger G, ‘The Most-Favoured-Nation Standard in British State Practice’ (1945) 22 British Year Book of International Law 96.
110. Scovazzi T, ‘Alcuni Antichi Trattati Tra Cristiani e Mussulmani per La Tutela Del Commercio Marittimo Nel Mediterraneo’ in Guido Camarda, Salvatore Corrieri and Tullio Scovazzi (eds), La Formazione del diritto maritimo nella prospettiva storica (Giuffrè Editore 2010) 85-109.
111. ——, Corso Di Diritto Internazionale, Vol I (Giuffrè Editore 2018).
112. Şimşir NB, Lozan Telgrafları: Türk Diplomatik Belgelerinde Lozan Barış Konferansı, Cilt I (Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi 1990).
113. Skilliter SA, William Harborne and the Trade with Turkey, 1578-1582 (Oxford University Press 1977).
114. Sonyel S, ‘Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Koruma (Protégé) Sistemi ve Kötüye Kullanılışı’ (1991) LV Belleten 359.
115. Sousa N, The Capitulatory Régime of Turkey. Its History, Origin and Nature (The Johns Hopkins Press, 1933).
116. Stefini T, ‘Ottoman Capitulations in Comparative Perspective, Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’ (2022) 53 Turcica 205-231.
117. Stoker B, Dracula & Dracula’s Guest (Wordsworth Editions 2009).
118. Taner T, ‘Kapitülasyonlar Nasıl İlga Edildi?”, Muammer Reşit Seviğ’e Armağan (İÜHF Yayınları 1956).
119. TBMM Tutanak Dergisi, Dönem 21, Yasama Yılı I, Cilt 9, Birleşim 46.
120. Ténékidès G, ‘L’occupation Hellénique En Asie-Mineure et La Justice Répressive Ottomane Dans Leurs Rapports Avec Les Capitulations’ (1921) 48 Journal du droit international 103.
121. ——, ‘La Floraison Des Protégés Étrangers Dans La Région de Smyrne Depuis l’armistice’ (1922) 49 Journal du droit international 326.
122. Thayer LE, ‘The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire and the Question of Their Abrogation as It Affects the United States’ (1923) 17 American Journal of International Law 207.
123. ‘The Attempt of Turkey to Abrogate the Capitulations” (1914) 8 American Journal of International Law 873 https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002930000098262/type/journal_article.
124. ‘Traité Additionnel Secret Entre l’Empire Allemand et l’Empire Ottoman, Concernant Le Complément et La Modification Des Traités Secrets Allemands-Ottomans Du 28 Septembre 1916 Relatifs Aux Conditions de Paix Future, et Du 11 Janvier 1917 Relatif à l’abolition’, Akten des Auswärtigen Amts, Bonn. IA 127 n. 5 secr.
125. ‘Traité Entre La Turquie et La Russie’ http://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/Kutuphane/Kurucu_Anlasmalar/1921-moskova-anlasmasi-fransizca.pdf accessed 11 November 2020.
126. ‘Traité Secret Avec l’Empire Allemand Relatif à l’abolition Des Capitulations, Berlin, 11 Janvier 1917)’, Akten des Auswärtigen Amts, IA 127, n. 5 secr.
127. ‘Treaty Between the United States of America and the Ottoman Empire. Commerce and Navigation’ (1830) accessed 4 February 2021.
128. Treaty of Lausanne (signed 24 July 1923, entered into force 6 August 1924) 28 LNTS 11.
129. Twiss T, The Law of Nations Considered As Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations In Time of Peace (2nd edn, Clarendon Press 1884).
130. Üstündağ S, ‘Tahkim ve Özellikle Uluslararası Tahkim’, Yargı Reformu Sempozyumu (İzmir Barosu 2000) 294-300.
131. Van den Boogert MH, ‘Consular Jurisdiction in the Ottoman Legal System in the Eighteenth Century’ (2003) 83 Oriente Moderno 613.
132. ——, The Capitulations and the Ottoman Legal System, Qadis, Consuls and Beratlıs in the 18th Century (Brill 2005).
133. Vanneste T, Intra-European Litigation in Eighteenth-Century Izmir: The Role of the Merchants’ Style (Brill 2022).
134. Visser L-E, ‘Clause de La Nation La plus Favorisée Dans Les Traités de Commerce’ (1902) 4 Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparée 66.
135. Young G, ‘Privilèges Judiciaires Des Étrangers: Mémoire Communiqué Aux Missions et Publié Dans La Turquie Du 7 Juillet 1869’, Corps de Droit ottoman: Recueil des Codes, Règlements, Ordonnances et Actes les plus importants du Droit Intérieur, et d’Études sur le Droit Coutumier de l’Empire Ottoman, Vol I (Clarendon Press 1905).
136. Zeller G, ‘Une Légende Qui a La Vie Dure : Les Capitulations de 1535’ (1955) 2 Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 127.