Arbitrating Business and Human Rights Disputes

Öz

Keeping the negative impacts of business activities on human rights and the weak position of the victims as well as other parties, the Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration (Hague Rules) have recently been adopted with the description that international arbitration holds great promise as a method to be used to resolve human rights disputes involving business. While there are criticisms about the practicability and the usefulness of the Hague rules, with certain consideration for improvement, the Hague Rules can be an effective step towards achieving justice for victims of Business and Human Rights violations and abuses. This paper aims to present first the history of creation and analysis of the effectiveness of the Hague Rules, and second, to elaborate on why arbitration is a good option for Business and Human Rights disputes. After that, the paper will present the challenges related to the applicability of the rules followed by its future implications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Business
• Human rights
• Business and human righst disputes
• Arbitration
• Human rights violations
• Multinational corporations
• victim
• UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

İş Dünyası ve İnsan Hakları Uyuşmazlıklarında Tahkim

Öz

Ticari faaliyetlerin insan hakları üzerindeki olumsuz etkileri ve mağdurların zayıf konumu dikkate alınarak çok uluslu şirketlerin sebep olduğu insan hakları ihlallerinin tahkim yoluyla çözümü için yakın zamanda İş Dünyası ve İnsan Hakları Lahey Tahkim Kuralları (Lahey Kuralları) kabul edilmiştir. Söz konusu Lahey Kurallarının yararlılığı ve elverişliliği konusunda eleştiriler olmakla beraber Kurallar, çok uluslu şirketlerin sebep olduğu insan hakları ihlalleri mağdurlarına adalete erişim konusunda etkin bir yol sunabilir. Bu çalışmanın konusu, Lahey Kurallarının ortaya çıkma sürecini ve tarihçesini kısaca ortaya koyduktan sonra tahkimin insan hakları ihlallerinden doğan uyuşmazlıkların çözümü konusunda neden tercih edilmesi gerektiğini incelemektir. Bu kapsamda, Lahey Kurallarının iş dünyası ve insan hakları uyuşmazlıklarının kendine has özellikleri dikkate alınarak hazırlanmış maddeleri ele alınacaktır
Ayrıca çalışmada Lahey kurallarının eksiklikleri ve geliştirilmesi gereken noktaları üzerinde de durulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş dünyası
• İnsan Hakları
• İş dünyası ve insan hakları uyuşmazlıkları
• Tahkim
• İnsan hakları ihlali
• Çok uluslu şirketler
• Mağdur
• Birleşmiş Milletler İş Dünyası ve İnsan Hakları Hakkında Rehber İlkeler

Kaynakça

1. Ahn K H, Moon H C, An Introductory Study on the Draft Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration, Journal of Arbitration Studies (2019), s. 3-22
2. Alston P, The “Not-a-Cat” Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accomodate Non-State Actors?, Non-State Actors and Human Rights, Philip Alston (ed.), Oxford (2005), s. 3-36 http://www.ivr.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-abae-0dd7-ffff-ffffd5220c3b/03%2520-%2520Not%2520a%2520Cat%2520Syndrome.pdf
3. Baykitch A, Bao E, International Arbitration of Business-Related Human Rights Disputes, King & Wood Mallesons (2018) https://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/international-arbitration-of-business-related-human-rights-disputes-20181221
4. Brandão N, Is BHR Arbitration the New Black? A Proposal for International Arbitration on Business and Human Rights, ELSA France Press (2018) https://publications.elsafrance.org/2018/02/18/is-bhr-arbitration-the-new-black-a-proposal-for-international-arbitration-on-business-and-human-rights/
5. Briggs A, Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments, 6th edn., Informa Law from Routledge (2015)
6. Can O, Yücel R, Birleşmiş Milletler Küresel İlkeler Sözleşmesi Temelinde Şirketlere Karşı İnsan Haklarının Korunması Hakkında Somut Öneriler, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, 35(2), (2019), s. 105-130
7. Caplan L M. , Feighery T J, Rotstei J, New Arbitration Rules for the Resolution of Business and Human Rights Disputes Unveiled, Arent Fox (2020) https://www.arentfox.com/perspectives/international-arbitration-dispute-resolution-blog/new-arbitration-rules-the-resolution
8. Crockett A, de Sousa M, Arbitrating Business and Human Rights Disputes: Viable for Victims? Asian Dispute Review (2019), s. 104-111

9. Cronstedt C, Eijsbouts J, Margolis A, Ratner S, Scheltema M, Thompson R, International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights: A Step Forward(2017), s. 1-3. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/11/16/international-arbitration-business-human-rights-step-forward/
10. Cronstedt C, Thompson R, A Proposal for an International Arbitration Tribunal on Business and Human Rights, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 57 Online Symposium (2016), s. 66-69. https://harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/Cronstedt-and-Thompson_0615.pdf
11. Dautaj Y, Roll Out the Red Carpet: The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration are Finally Here!, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (2019) http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/12/26/roll-out-the-red-carpet-the-hague-rules-on-business-and-human-rights-arbitration-are-finally-here/
12. Doe M, Ratner S, Yiannibas K, Arbitrating Business and Human Rights Disputes: Public Consultation on the Draft Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (2019) http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/06/27/arbitrating-business-and-human-rights-disputes-public-consultation-on-the-draft-hague-rules-on-business-and-human-rights-arbitration/
13. Dunmore, C, International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights Disputes: Part I, Introducing the Proposal, Asser Institute: Doing Business Right Blog (2017) https://www.asser.nl/DoingBusinessRight/Blog/post/international-arbitration-of-business-and-human-rights-disputes-part-1-introducing-the-proposal
14. Dunmore C, International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights Disputes: Part 2- Advantages and challenges, Asser Institute: Doing Business Right Blog (2017) https://www.asser.nl/DoingBusinessRight/Blog/post/international-arbitration-of-business-and-human-rights-disputes-part-2-advantages-and-challenges-by-catherine-dunmore
15. Dunmore C, International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights Disputes: Part 3- Case study of the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh’s binding arbitration process, Asser Institute: Doing Business Right Blog (2017) https://www.asser.nl/DoingBusinessRight/Blog/post/international-arbitration-of-business-and-human-rights-disputes-part-3-case-study-of-the-accord-on-fire-and-building-safety-in-bangladesh-s-binding-arbitration-process
16. Elliott, T, Risky Business: The Alien Tort Claims Act and The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Expand the Reach of US Court in a Global Economy, Rutgers Law Review Vol:62:1 (2009), s. 211-239.
17. Gillies P S, Forum Non Conveniens in the Context of International Commercial Arbitration, Macquarie Law Working Paper No. 2008-6, s. 1-14 https://ssrn.com/abstract=1103344
18. Gottlieb C, The Launch of the Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration (2020), s. 1-6 https://www.clearygottlieb.com/-/media/files/alert-memos-2020/the-launch-of-the-hague-rules-on-business-and-human-rights-arbitration.pdf
19. Güler Sökmen E, Forum Non Conveniens Doktrini ve Uluslararası Paralel Davalar, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Prof. Dr. Durmuş TEZCAN’a Armağan, C.21 (2019), s. 2629-2658.
20. Izzo M L, A Further Step Towards Business and Human Rights Arbitration – The Hague Rules, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (2019) http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/09/13/a-further-step-towards-business-and-human-rights-arbitration-the-hague-rules/
21. Kıvılcım Z, Ulus-Aşırı Şirketler ve İnsan Hakları: Bakü-Tiflis-Ceyhan Boru Hattı Örneği, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 65-3 (2010), s. 87-122
22. Lahey Tahkim Kuralları: The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration’ (Center for International Legal Cooperation, December 2019) https://www.cilc.nl/cms/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/The-Hague-Rules-on-Business-and-Human-Rights-Arbitration_CILC-digital-version.pdf
23. Mert B M, Milletlerarası Tahkimde Üçüncü Kişi Finansmanı, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Özel Hukuk Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi (2019) http://nek.istanbul.edu.tr:4444/ekos/TEZ/ET001671.pdf
24. Ratner, S, Corporations and Human Rights: a Theory of Legal Responsibility, Yale Law Journal (2001), Vol: 111, s. 443-545
25. Ruggie J G, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights, Amnesty International Global Ethics Series, New York (2013)
26. Ruggie J (2008), Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secreteray-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/8/5, 7 Nisan 2008 https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G08/128/61/PDF/G0812861.pdf?OpenElement
27. Ruggie J (2010), Report of the Special Represenative of the Secretay-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Emnterprises: Business and Human rights: Further Steps toward the Operationalization of the “Proctect, Respect and Remedy Framework”, A/HRC/14/27, 9 Nisan 2010 https://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/trans_corporations/docs/a-hrc-14-27.pdf‘
28. Sachs L, Johnson L, Cordes K, Coleman J, Guven B, The Business and Human Rights Arbitration Rule Project: Falling short of its access to justice objectives, CCSI Briefing Note (2019), s. 1-11 http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2019/09/CCSI-BHR-Arb-Long-version-FINAL.pdf
29. Santacroce F, Benini C, Law Business Research., PCA Hosts Launch of Hague Rules for Business and Human Rights Disputes (2020) https://www.arblit.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/PCA-hosts-launch-of-Hague-Rules-for-business-and-human-rights-disputes.pdf
30. Shavana H, The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration: Noteworthy or Not Worthy for Victims of Human Rights Violations? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, (2020), s.1-3 http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/05/05/the-hague-rules-on-business-and-human-rights-arbitration-noteworthy-or-not-worthy-for-victims-of-human-rights-violations/?print=print
31. Shift, Oxfam, Global Compact Network Netherlands, Doing Business with Respect for Human Rights: A Guidance Tool for Companies (2016) https://shiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/business_respect_human_rights_full-1.pdf
32. Simma B, Desierto D, Rodriguez M D, Eijsbouts J, Kriebaum U, Lumerman P, Makinwa A, Meeran R, Puig S, Ratner S, Scheltema M, Spears S, Aaken A, Yiannibas K, International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights Disputes: Elements for Consideration in Draft Arbitral Rules, Model Clauses, and Other Aspects of the Arbitral Process, Central for International Legal Cooperation (2020), s. 1-24 https://www.cilc.nl/cms/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Elements-Paper_INTERNATIONAL-ARBITRATION-OF-BUSINESS-AND-HUMAN-RIGHTS-DISPUTE.font12.pdf
33. Tévar N Z, Can Arbitration Become the Preferred Grievance Mechanism in Conflicts Related to Business and Human Rights? (2015), s. 1-32 https://redtiempodelosderechos.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/wp-3-15.pdf
34. Voda C, Resolving Business and Human Rights Disputes-Is Arbitration the Way to Go?, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien (ZEuS) 3/2020, s. 465-487.
35. Wellings-Longmore S, Business and Human Rights Arbitration: Widening the net of remedies (2019) https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/arbitrationlinks/2019/september/business-and-human-rights-arbitration-widening-the-net-of-remedies
36. Yıldırım E, Birleşmiş Milletler İş Hayatı ve İnsan Hakları Rehber İlkelerinin Eleştirel bir Değerlendirmesi, VI. Sosyal İnsan Hakları Ulusal Sempozyumu (2014), s. 1-24 http://www.ka.org.tr/dosyalar/file/Yayinlar/Raporlar/TURKCE/06/BM%20ELE%C5%9ET%C4%B0REL%20B%C4%B0R%20DE%C4%9EERLEND%C4%B0RME.pdf
37. Yiannibas K, The adaptability of international arbitration: Reforming the arbitration mechanism to provide effective remedy for business-related human rights abuses, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2018, Vol. 36(3), s. 214–231