Araştırma Makalesi

Monte Carlo Analysis of Radiation Shielding and Damage in Multi-Layer HDPE Shields

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 30 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Monte Carlo Analysis of Radiation Shielding and Damage in Multi-Layer HDPE Shields

Abstract

In this study, a functionally graded two-layer HDPE composite shield was designed, and its efficacy against secondary space radiation was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. The design, combining a neutron-absorbing front layer (6LiH/B2O3 doped) and a gamma-attenuating secondary layer (BiTaO4 doped), significantly outperforms single-layer structures. GEANT4 simulations show that while the front layer efficiently absorbs neutrons, it generates secondary gammas, which are subsequently attenuated by the secondary layer—achieving up to an 85% reduction in the epithermal neutron energy range. FLUKA analyses highlighted a trade-off between shielding and durability: the front layer sustained intense damage (approx. 1200x DPA and 500x TID vs. pure HDPE) due to (n,α) reactions. However, this damage was confined to the first 0.5 cm, preserving the secondary layer's integrity. Consequently, the multi-layer design successfully mitigates primary neutrons and secondary radiation while localizing material degradation.

Keywords

HDPE , 6LiH , B₂O₃ , BiTaO4 , Radiation Damage , FLUKA

Kaynakça

  1. D. O’Sullivan, “Exposure to galactic cosmic radiation and solar energetic particles,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 125, no. 1–4, pp. 407–411, 2007, doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm317.
  2. T. W. Armstrong and B. L. Colborn, “Predictions of induced radioactivity for spacecraft in low Earth orbit,” Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part D: Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 101–130, 1992, doi: 10.1016/1359-0189(92)90089-E.
  3. P. Spillantini et al., “Shielding from cosmic radiation for interplanetary missions: Active and passive methods,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.028.
  4. L. W. Townsend, “Critical analysis of active shielding methods for space radiation protection,” in Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conf., Mar. 2005, pp. 724–730, doi: 10.1109/AERO.2005.1559364.
  5. J. W. Wilson et al., “Issues in space radiation protection: Galactic cosmic rays,” Health Physics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 1995, doi: 10.1097/00004032-199501000-00006.
  6. J. M. DeWitt and E. R. Benton, “Shielding effectiveness: A weighted figure of merit for space radiation shielding,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 161, p. 109141, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109141.
  7. F. A. Cucinotta and M. Durante, “Cancer risk from exposure to galactic cosmic rays: Implications for space exploration by human beings,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 431–435, 2006, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70695-7.
  8. J. W. Wilson, Ed., Shielding Strategies for Human Space Exploration, NASA, vol. 3360, 1997.
  9. M. Durante and F. A. Cucinotta, “Physical basis of radiation protection in space travel,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1245–1281, 2011, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1245.
  10. F. Luoni et al., “Dose attenuation in innovative shielding materials for radiation protection in space: Measurements and simulations,” Radiation Research, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 107–119, 2022, doi: 10.1667/RADE-22-00147.1.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gültekin, B., Öztürk, E., & Torun, T. R. (2025). Monte Carlo Analysis of Radiation Shielding and Damage in Multi-Layer HDPE Shields. Positive Science International, 1(2), 57-73. https://izlik.org/JA27UB44WM