Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Transfer of meaning from the educator to the student in piano interpretation within the framework of the constructionist perspective

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 197 - 212, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20231122

Öz

This research analyzes the concept of meaning from a constructionist perspective. From this perspective, while trying to determine how meaning is constructed and conveyed in piano interpretation, the study determined three different categories of meaning as a framework. One can list these categories as aesthetic meaning, symbolic meaning, and pragmatic meaning. In the aesthetic meaning category, music is essentially analyzed in terms of its formal qualities, that is, its immutable characteristics as indicated on the note. Researchers who analyze music based on this category often argue that music carries its meaning. The second category, symbolic meaning, refers to the symbolic meanings attributed to music in relation to the cultural context to which it belongs. Within the framework of this category of meaning, people also consider music in terms of its aesthetic qualities, but the focus is the meanings attributed to music by individuals or societies. The third and final category, pragmatic meaning, is directly related to how one uses music. Within the framework of pragmatic meaning, people base music analysis on the functional uses of music, and they analyze the other two categories accordingly. Here, in line with the brief definitions of the categories of meaning, this study examines the construction and transfer of meaning in piano interpretation with examples from selected works by Ludwig van Beethoven, Frederic Chopin, and Sergei Rachmaninoff. Beethoven’s No. 23 Piano Sonata “Appassionata” is characterized by the concept of contrast based on the fate motif; Chopin’s Op. 31, No. 2 Scherzo is characterized by serenity and calmness; and Rachmaninoff’s Op. 33 Etude No. 8 is characterized based on fairytale-like storytelling. These examples, interpreted according to the requirements of notation and edition, do not vary fundamentally because there is no information on the notes that contribute to the interpretation and explain the subject of the piece. However, the information we have about the composers’ works has shown us that more meaning can be attributed to the work beyond the interpretation suggestions on the notation. These attributed meanings act as a suggestion for the interpreter. However, since interpretation is directly related to the individual’s qualities, these examples of suggestive meaning do not have a given and fixed structure; they vary from person to person.

Teşekkür

The translation of this article was made by Enago translation team.

Kaynakça

  • Allan, K. (2020). Çağdaş sosyal ve sosyolojik teori: toplumsal dünyaları görünür kılmak (Contemporary social and sociological theory: visualizing social worlds). (trans Bora,A; Cosar,S; Ergül,H; Pamir, M; Unal, E.) Istanbul Bilgi University.
  • Aslan, U. (2018). Metaphors and meaning in the Turkish contemporary Christian music. Musicologist, 2(1), 78-95.
  • Barnard, A. (2016). Simgesel düşüncenin doğuşu (Genesis of symbolic thought). (trans. Dogan, M.). Boğaziçi University.
  • Bertensson, S.A. (1956). Sergei Rachmaninoff: a life time in music. New York University.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. University of California.
  • Chopin, F. (2018). Scherzi. (N. Müllemann, Dü.). G. Henle Verlag.
  • Cook, N. (2001). Theorizing musical meaning. Music Theory Spectrum, 23(2), 170-195.
  • Dubal, D. (2004). The art of the piano: its performers, literature and recordings. Amadeus.
  • Erol, A. (2009). Popüler müziği anlamak: kültürel kimlik bağlamında popüler müzikte anlam (Understanding popular music: meaning in popular music in the context of cultural identity). Bağlam.
  • Erol, A. (2012). Music, power and symbolic violence: the Turkish state’s music policies during the early republican period. Europan Jurnal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 35-52.
  • Hall, S. (2017). Temsil-kültürel temsiller ve anlamlandırma uygulamaları (Cultural representations and signifying practices). (trans. İ. Dündar). Pinhan.
  • Herriot, E. (2007). Beethoven. (trans. C. Aktüze). Pan.
  • Kaemmer, J.E. (1993). Music in human life, anthropological perspectives. University of Texas.
  • Kramer, L. (2003). Musicolgy and meaning. The Musical Times, 144(1883), 6-12.
  • Kutluk, F. (2022). Neden müzik dinleriz? (Why are we listening music?). H2O.
  • Lewis, G.H. (1982). Popular music: symbolic resource and transformer of meaning in society. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 13(2), 183-189.
  • Niecks, F. (2009). Frederic Chopin as a man and musician. Echo Library.
  • Özer, Y. (1997). Bilim perspektifinde müzik (Music in the perspective of science). Dokuz Eylül.
  • Rieseman, O.v. (1970). Rachmaninoff’s recolections. Books for Libraries.
  • Schindler, A.F. (1996). Beethoven as I knew him. Dover.
  • Yahşi, F.E.(2017).Aninterpretationsuggestion for the first movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata no.23 in accordance with faith motif. Art and Design Studies, 58, 1-8.
  • Web Sites web 1. https://nationaltoday.com/ birthday/ludwig-van-beethoven/
  • web 2. https://www.britannica.com/ biography/Frederic-Chopin
  • web 3. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sergey_Rahmaninov

Transfer of meaning from the educator to the student in piano interpretation within the framework of the constructionist perspective

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 197 - 212, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20231122

Öz

Özet
Bu çalışmada, anlam kavramı inşacı perspektifle ele alınmıştır. Bu perspektiften hareketle piyano yorumculuğunda anlamın nasıl inşa edildiği ve aktarıldığı saptanmaya çalışılırken estetik, simgesel ve pragmatik anlam kategorileri anlamın incelenmesinde bir çerçeve olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda piyano yorumculuğunda anlamın oluşturulması ve aktarımı Beethoven, Chopin ve Rachmaninoff’un seçilen eserlerinden örneklerle incelenmiştir. Beethoven’in 23. Piyano Sonatı “Appassionata” zıtlık kavramı, Chopin Op. 31 2 numaralı Scherzo’su dinginlik ve sakinlik, Rachmaninoff’un Op. 33 8 numaralı etüdü masalsı hikayeleştirme temelinde ele alınmıştır. Yüklenen bu anlamlar yorumcu için bir öneri niteliği taşımaktadır. Ancak yorumculuk bireysel niteliklerle doğrudan ilişkili olduğundan öneri niteliği taşıyan bu anlam örnekleri verili ve sabit bir yapıya sahip değildir, kişiden kişiye değişkenlik göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Allan, K. (2020). Çağdaş sosyal ve sosyolojik teori: toplumsal dünyaları görünür kılmak (Contemporary social and sociological theory: visualizing social worlds). (trans Bora,A; Cosar,S; Ergül,H; Pamir, M; Unal, E.) Istanbul Bilgi University.
  • Aslan, U. (2018). Metaphors and meaning in the Turkish contemporary Christian music. Musicologist, 2(1), 78-95.
  • Barnard, A. (2016). Simgesel düşüncenin doğuşu (Genesis of symbolic thought). (trans. Dogan, M.). Boğaziçi University.
  • Bertensson, S.A. (1956). Sergei Rachmaninoff: a life time in music. New York University.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. University of California.
  • Chopin, F. (2018). Scherzi. (N. Müllemann, Dü.). G. Henle Verlag.
  • Cook, N. (2001). Theorizing musical meaning. Music Theory Spectrum, 23(2), 170-195.
  • Dubal, D. (2004). The art of the piano: its performers, literature and recordings. Amadeus.
  • Erol, A. (2009). Popüler müziği anlamak: kültürel kimlik bağlamında popüler müzikte anlam (Understanding popular music: meaning in popular music in the context of cultural identity). Bağlam.
  • Erol, A. (2012). Music, power and symbolic violence: the Turkish state’s music policies during the early republican period. Europan Jurnal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 35-52.
  • Hall, S. (2017). Temsil-kültürel temsiller ve anlamlandırma uygulamaları (Cultural representations and signifying practices). (trans. İ. Dündar). Pinhan.
  • Herriot, E. (2007). Beethoven. (trans. C. Aktüze). Pan.
  • Kaemmer, J.E. (1993). Music in human life, anthropological perspectives. University of Texas.
  • Kramer, L. (2003). Musicolgy and meaning. The Musical Times, 144(1883), 6-12.
  • Kutluk, F. (2022). Neden müzik dinleriz? (Why are we listening music?). H2O.
  • Lewis, G.H. (1982). Popular music: symbolic resource and transformer of meaning in society. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 13(2), 183-189.
  • Niecks, F. (2009). Frederic Chopin as a man and musician. Echo Library.
  • Özer, Y. (1997). Bilim perspektifinde müzik (Music in the perspective of science). Dokuz Eylül.
  • Rieseman, O.v. (1970). Rachmaninoff’s recolections. Books for Libraries.
  • Schindler, A.F. (1996). Beethoven as I knew him. Dover.
  • Yahşi, F.E.(2017).Aninterpretationsuggestion for the first movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata no.23 in accordance with faith motif. Art and Design Studies, 58, 1-8.
  • Web Sites web 1. https://nationaltoday.com/ birthday/ludwig-van-beethoven/
  • web 2. https://www.britannica.com/ biography/Frederic-Chopin
  • web 3. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sergey_Rahmaninov
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Müzik
Bölüm Orijinal araştırma
Yazarlar

Fahrettin Eren Yahşi 0000-0001-8983-4615

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 28 Haziran 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yahşi, F. E. (2023). Transfer of meaning from the educator to the student in piano interpretation within the framework of the constructionist perspective. Rast Musicology Journal, 11(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20231122

Yazarlarımızın editöryal süreçlerin aksamaması için editöryal emaillere 3 gün içinde yanıt vermeleri gerekmektedir.