An Investigation into Digital Literacy Views of Social Studies Preservice Teachers in the Context of Authentic Learning

Abstract

The learning characteristics of the individuals have been rapidly changing, and the current 21st century learners are now expected to have innovation, digital literacy, life and career skills. The educational systems must be outfitted with a prerequisite of digital resources, and curricula for digital literacy should be designed to promote authentic learning environment to which students will relate and respond.This study aims to determine how social studies teacher candidates perceive the concept of "digital literacy." Accordingly, social studies teacher candidates’ metaphors about digital literacy in the context of authentic learning were examined through semi-structured interviews implementing the survey model as a qualitative research technique. The study was carried out in a university in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey in the fall term of the academic year of 2017-2018, with teacher candidates in the programs of social studies teaching. A semi-structured interview form and a metaphor completion task developed by the researchers were used as the data collection tools. Based on expert opinions, the drafts of the semi- structured interview form and the metaphor completion task were revised and finalized. The data were analyzed and interpreted through content analysis. Based on the findings, some suggestions are made. 

Keywords

• Digital Literacy,Social Studies,Qualitative Research,Preservice Teachers

Kaynakça

1. Alberta Education. (2011). Framework for student learning: Competencies for engaged thinkers and ethical citizens with an entrepreneurial spirit. Retrieved from https://education.alberta.ca/?searchMode=3.
2. Aygün, Ş., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z. & Yaşar, S. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarına yönelik 21. yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(40), 160-175.
3. Baelo, R. & Svensson, M. (2015). Teacher students’ perceptions of their digital competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 180(2015), 1527-1534.
4. Bacanak, A. (2013). Teachers’ Views about science and technology lesson effects on the development of students’ entrepreneurship skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 622-629.
5. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies & practices (pp. 17-32).
6. Bektaş, M. & Horzum M. B. (2014). Otantik öğrenme. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
7. Boholano, B. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(1), 21-29.
8. Borthwick, F., Bennett, S., Lefoe, G. E., & Huber, E. (2007). Applying authentic learning to social science: A learning design for an inter-disciplinary sociology subject. Journal of Learning Design. 2(1), 14-24.

9. Brown, J. (2006). New learning environments for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. Change, 38(5), 18-24. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40178121
10. Carpenter, J. (2008). Metaphors in qualitative research: Shedding light or casting shadows? Res. Nurs. Health 31(3), 274-282.
11. Cordell, R.M. (2013). Information literacy and digital literacy competing or complementary. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 177-183.
12. Hamutoğlu, N., Güngören, Ö., Uyanık, G. & Erdoğan, D. (2017). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(1), 408- 429.
13. Herrington, J. & Kervin, L. (2007). Authentic learning supported by technology: 10 suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. Educational Media International, 44(3), 219-236.
14. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C. & Oliver, R. (2010). A Guide to Authentic e-Learning. New York: Routledge Publishing.
15. Hobbs, R & Morre, D. (2013). Discovering media literacy teaching digital media and popular culture in element school. (1st Ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
16. Jenkins, R. (2015). Integrating digital literacy into English language instruction: Companion Learning Resource. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education.
17. Jones-Kavalier, B.R. & Flannigan, S.L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. Educause Quarterly, 29(2), 8-10.
18. Lingard, M. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum handbook. Retrieved from http://mattlingard.tumblr.com/post/832107416/from-futurelab-handbook-digital-literacy-across
19. Lombardi, M.M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. ELI Report No. 1. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
20. Maden, S., Maden, A., & Banaz, E. (2018). Ortaokul 5. sınıf türkçe ders kitaplarının dijital okuryazarlık bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 686-698.
21. Martin, A. & Grudziecki, J.(2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development, Innovation in teaching and learning in information and computer sciences, 5(4), 249-267.
22. McCandless, B. (2012). The use and misuse of metaphor in education and education reform. education, 132(3), 538-547.
23. Meyers, E., Erickson, I., Small, R. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Journal Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367.
24. Miller, R. (2009). Developing 21st century skills through the use of student personal learning networks. Doctoral Dissertation, Northcentral University, Prescott Valley, Arizona.
25. Milton, M. & Vozzo, L. (2013). Digital literacy and digital pedagogies for teaching literacy: Pre-service teachers’ experience on teaching rounds. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(1), 72-97.
26. Odabaşı, H., Kuzu, A. & Günüç, S. (2013). 21. yüzyıl öğrenci özelliklerinin öğretmen adayları tarafından tanımlanması: bir twitter uygulaması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(4), 436-455.
27. Öksüz, Y., Demir, A. & İci, A. (2016). Öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık kavramına ilişkin metaforlarının incelenmesi. International Journal of Social Science, 50, 387-396.
28. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çev.). Ankara: A Pegem Akademi.
30. Saban, A. (2004). Giriş düzeyindeki sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının “öğretmen” kavramına ilişkin ileri sürdükleri metaforlar. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 131-155.
31. Schreuers, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: Aging, media discourse, and self- determination. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2).
32. Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for the 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630- 634.
33. Simpsona, R., & Obdalovab, O. (2014). New technologies in higher education – ICT Skills or Digital Literacy? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 104-111.
34. Şengül, S., Katrancı, Y. & Cantimer, G. G. (2014). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin “matematik öğretmeni” kavramına ilişkin metafor algıları. International Journal of Social Science, 25(1), 89-111.
35. Techataweewan, W. & Prasertsin, U. (2017). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215-221.
36. Tierney, R. J., Bond, E., & Bresler, J. (2006). Examining literate lives as students engage with multiple literacies. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 359-367.
37. Uslu, S., Yazıcı, K. & Çetin, M. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının medya okuryazarlık düzeyleri. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(23), 757-778.
38. Üstündağ, M., Güneş, E., & Bahçıvan, E. (2017). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması ve fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık durumları. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19-29.
39. Walton, G. (2016) “Digital literacy” (DL): Establishing the boundaries and identifying the partners. New review of academic librarianship, 22(1), 1-4.
40. Yalçın, S. (2018). 21. yüzyıl becerileri ve bu becerilerin ölçülmesinde kullanılan araçlar ve yaklaşımlar. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 51(1), 183-201.
41. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (5. Basım). Ankara: Seçkin.