“A border is a Ban” - Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Experiences of Europe’s Borders and Boundaries

Öz

In this paper, we examine the conceptual understanding and experiences that students in German secondary schools have of boundaries. For our research we conducted qualitative interviews and surveys (interviews n=20; surveys n=21) with children (aged 14-17) born both in Germany and with refugee backgrounds. We asked for the children’s conceptual understanding of the emergence and function of boundaries and their personal encounters with them.  We studied the results of these interviews using qualitative content analysis to learn more about the conceptual understanding and experiences of students. Our findings on the emergence of borders show that students have limited understanding of boundaries and differing spatial concepts that exist for them. We also observed interesting distinctions between personal experiences of borders. The results may provide a base for further research and development in terms of conceptual-change-based methods for geography education on the topics of territories, borders and boundaries.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Borders,Political Geography,Geography Education,Europe,Conceptual Understanding

Kaynakça

1. Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. In Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53 – 80.
2. Agnew, J. et al. (Ed.) (2015). The wiley-blackwell companion to political geography, chichester: Wiley-blackwell.
3. Amilhat Szary, A.-L. (2015). Boundaries and borders. In Agnew, J. et al. (Ed.). The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Geography, 13 -25, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
5. Budke, A. & Schindler, J. (2016). Grenzen in karten reflektieren – das beispiel der grenzen in europa. In Gryl, I. (Ed..). Reflexive kartenarbeit. Methoden und aufgaben, 53-59, Braunschweig: Westermann.
6. Diener, A.C. & Hagen, J. (2012). Borders: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Elden, S. (2011). Territory without borders. In Harvard International Review, 20, 2017. accessed March http://hir.harvard.edu/article/?a=2843
8. Gould, P. & White, R. (1986). Mental maps. London: Routledge.

9. Jones, L. & Sage, D. (2010). New directions in critical geopolitics: An introduction. In GeoJournal, 75(4), 315 325.
10. Kallio, K.P. (2016). Becoming geopolitical in the everyday world. In Benwell, M.C. & P. Hopkins (Ed.), Children, Young People and Critical Geopolitics. 169 -185, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
11. Kallio, K.P. & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children´s politics. In Political Geography 30(2), 99 – 109.
12. Kattmann, U. et al. (1997). Das modell der didaktischen rekonstruktion – Ein rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische forschung und entwicklung. In Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3-18.
13. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
14. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und techniken. Beltz: Weinheim.
15. Mentz, O. (2010). The European challenge. How to integrate European competences in geography in higher education. In European Journal of Geography, 1, 61 - 69
16. Murphy, A.B. (2013). Territory´s continuing allure. In Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1212-1226.
17. Paasi, A. (1996). Territories, boundaries and consciousness: The changing geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. Wiley: Chichester.
18. Paasi, A. (2009). Bounded spaces in a `borderless world`: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. In Journal of Power, 2(2), 213-234.
19. Popescu, G. (2013). Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
20. Pykett, J. (2009). Making citizens in the classroom: An urban geography of citizenship education? In Urban Studies 46(4), 803 – 823.
21. Reinfried, S. (2010). Lernen als vorstellungsänderung: aspekte der vorstellungsforschung mit bezügen zur geographiedidaktik. In Reinfried, S. (Ed.) Schülervorstellungen und geographisches Lernen. Aktuelle Conceptual-Change-Forschung und Stand der theoretischen Diskussion, 1-31, Berlin: Logos.
22. Reuber, P. (2014). Territorien & Grenzen. In Lossau, J., Freytag, T. & Lippuner, R. (Ed.), Schlüsselbegriffe der Kultur- und Sozialgeographie. 182-195, Stuttgart: Ulmer UTB.
23. Schmeinck, D. (2007). Wie kinder die welt sehen eine empirische ländervergleichsstudie über die räumliche vorstellung von grundschulkindern. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
24. Schmeinck, D. (2013). `They are like us` - teaching about Europe through the eyes of children. In: Education, 3-13, 41(4), 398-409.
25. Schultz, H.D. (2003). Welches Europa soll es denn sein? Anregungen für den geographieunterricht. In Internationale Schulbuchforschung, Vol. 25, No. 3, Raumbilder Raumkonstruktionen/Areas Imagined Areas Constructed: 223-256.
26. Schultz, H.D. (2013). Grenzen. In: Rolfes, M. & Uhlenwinkel, A. (Ed.). Metzler handbuch 2.0 geographieunterricht. Ein leitfaden für praxis und ausbildung, 326-332, Braunschweig: Westermann.
27. Seidel, S. & Budke, A. (2017). Keine räume ohne grenzen – typen von raumgrenzen für den geographieunterricht. In zeitschrift für didaktik der gesellschaftswissenschaften, 2(2017), 41-59.
28. Staeheli, L.A. & Hammett, D. (2010). Educating the new national citizen: Education, political subjectivity and divided societies. In Citizenship Studies 14(6), 667 – 680.
29. Strauss, A.L. & Glaser, B.G. (2008). Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer forschung. Bern: Huber.
30. Sudas, I. & Gokten, C. (2012). Cognitive maps of Europe: Geographical knowledge of Turkish geography students. In European Journal of Geography, 3(1), 41 – 56.
31. Van Houtum, H. (2005). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. In geopolitics, 10, 672 – 679.
32. Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
33. Wardenga, U. (2002). Räume der geographie und zu raumbegriffen im geographie-unterricht. In geographie heute, Jg. 23, H. 200(8), 11.