Araştırma Makalesi

INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4 20 Ekim 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES

Öz

This study aims to analyze the nature of the individual-state relationship from a descriptive approach and a holistic perspective. The importance attributed to the sociality of the individual is embedded in both Eastern and Western political philosophies. The position of the individual vis-à-vis the state and other social structures depends on the philosophical understanding of the period and context. The emphasis on the sociality of the individual, which is put forward in the critique of classical liberalism’s perception of the individual is also observed in Confucian ethics and Hegel’s philosophical approach and thus implies a linear understanding. Especially since the last quarter of the 20th century, liberal communitarians have revived the debate by criticizing classical liberal conception of the individual. In contrast to classical liberalism’s understanding of transcendental individual who is free from social/collective features, liberal communitarians highlight the significance of social ties and structures. Recognizing the importance of the individual’s collective ties, this study examines the individual’s relationship with collective structures, especially the state, in Confucianism, Hegelian political thought, and communitarianism and argues that the relationship between the two has been a subject of constant debate from past to present.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Individual, State, Confucianism, Hegel, Communitarianism

Kaynakça

  1. Beiser, F. (2005). Hegel. London: Routledge.
  2. Bell, D. A. (1996). Democracy in Confucian societies: The challenge of justification. In D. A. Bell, D. Brown, K. Jayasuriya & D. M. Jones (Eds.) Towards illiberal democracy in Pacific Asia (pp.17-40). New York: MacMillan.
  3. Bell D. A. & Hahm, Chaibong. (2003). Confucianism for the modern world. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Routledge.
  5. Buchanan, A. E. (1989). Assessing the communitarian critique of liberalism. Ethics 99(4), 852-882.
  6. Confucius. (1999). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
  7. Dagger, R. (2004). Communitarianism and republicanism. In G. F. Gaus & C. Kukathas (Eds.) Handbook of Political Theory (pp.167-179). London: Sage Publications.
  8. Gutmann, A. (1985). Communitarian critics of liberalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (3), 308-322.
  9. Hegel, G.W.F. (1975). Lectures on the philosophy of world history (D. Forbes, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Hegel, G.W.F. (1979). Phenomenology of spirit. (A.V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford university Press.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ceyhan, N. (2023). INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 6(4), 520-537. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1356929
AMA
1.Ceyhan N. INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2023;6(4):520-537. doi:10.33723/rs.1356929
Chicago
Ceyhan, Nurcan. 2023. “INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 6 (4): 520-37. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1356929.
EndNote
Ceyhan N (01 Ekim 2023) INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 6 4 520–537.
IEEE
[1]N. Ceyhan, “INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES”, R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, c. 6, sy 4, ss. 520–537, Eki. 2023, doi: 10.33723/rs.1356929.
ISNAD
Ceyhan, Nurcan. “INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 6/4 (01 Ekim 2023): 520-537. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1356929.
JAMA
1.Ceyhan N. INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2023;6:520–537.
MLA
Ceyhan, Nurcan. “INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, c. 6, sy 4, Ekim 2023, ss. 520-37, doi:10.33723/rs.1356929.
Vancouver
1.Nurcan Ceyhan. INDIVIDUAL-STATE RELATIONSHIP FROM EAST TO WEST THROUGH COLLECTIVITIES: THE SOCIAL INDIVIDUAL IN CONFUCIAN, HEGELIAN, AND COMMUNITARIAN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 01 Ekim 2023;6(4):520-37. doi:10.33723/rs.1356929