REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DETERMINANTS OF MATERIAL AND SOCIAL DEPRIVATION: THE CASES OF ISTANBUL AND ANKARA
Öz
This study aims to analyze the factors influencing material and social deprivation in Istanbul and Ankara, the two largest cities in Turkey. In this context, the study utilizes the 2022 Income and Living Conditions Survey (ILCS) household microdata provided by TURKSTAT, and the data were analyzed using the logit method. The findings reveal that there may be region-specific differences in the factors contributing to material and social deprivation. The analyses indicate that, in Ankara, being a tenant—compared to being a homeowner—increases the likelihood of experiencing material deprivation. The results also show that, while housing expenditures in Istanbul do not have a direct and statistically significant relationship with deprivation, in Ankara, higher spending on housing is associated with a lower probability of deprivation. In addition to these regional disparities, the study also identifies factors that exhibit similar patterns in both cities. Specifically, individuals who are unable to pay their loans, credit card debts, or utility bills on time are more likely to experience material and social deprivation, whereas higher household income is found to reduce the likelihood of deprivation. By revealing both common and differing mechanisms of material and social deprivation in Istanbul and Ankara, the study contributes to the development of need-based policies in the fight against deprivation.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Material and Social Deprivation, Income and Living Conditions, Logit Model
Etik Beyan
Etik kurul raporuna gerek yoktur
Kaynakça
- Arundel, R. & Ronald, R. (2021). The false promise of homeownership: Homeowner societies in an era of declining access and rising inequality. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1120-1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019895227 Atkinson, A. B. (1998). Social exclusion, poverty and unemployment. Exclusion, employment and opportunity, 4.
- Atkinson, A. B.; Cantillon, B., Marlier, E. & Nolan, B. (2002). Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion. Oxford University Press.
- Baker, E.; Lester, L. H., Bentley, R. & Beer, A. (2016). Poor housing quality: Prevalence and health effects. Journal of prevention & intervention in the community, 44(4), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1197714
- Burchardt, T.; Le Grand, J. & Piachaud, J. (2002). Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional. J. Hills, J. Le Grand, & D. Pichaud, Understanding social exclusion, 30-43.
- Cohen Raviv, O. & Lewin-Epstein, N. (2021). Homeownership regimes and class inequality among young adults. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62(5), 404-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152211070817
- Dewilde, C. (2018). Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe. Urban Studies, 55(12), 2618-2639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017729077
- Elsinga, M. & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-005-9023-4
- Eurofound (2022). Access to essential services for people on low incomes: Energy, public transport and digital communications, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- Evans, G. W.; Wells, N. M. & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00074
- Haffner, M. & Boumeester, H. (2010). The affordability of housing in the Netherlands: An increasing income gap between renting and owning? Housing Studies, 25(6), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.511472