Personality and Emotional Intelligence: A Research on Y Generation

Yıl 2018, , 376 - 384, 30.07.2018

Güven Ordun , F. Aslı Akun

https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.427685

Öz

The aim of the research is to understand attributes of
Y generation. The sample of the research consists of 237 people with convenience
sampling from various state universities in Istanbul. In the research, 120 item
personality inventory that was developed by Johnson (2014) deriving from Costa
and McCrea’s Five Factor Personality Inventory, Wong and Law’s Emotional
Intelligence scale (2002) and Rogers’ Q sort scale (1961) were used. The
results revealed that there are statistically significant relations between
emotional intelligence and personality traits. Effective use of emotions had a
positive correlation with conscientiousness and regulating emotions had a
negative correlation with neuroticism and they were stronger than other
correlations. Personality traits that have statistically significant and
positive correlations with all dimensions of emotional intelligence were found
to be extraversion and openness/openness to experience. Regression analysis for
understanding the effects of personality traits on emotional intelligence, the
effects of personality traits on emotional intelligence were statistically
stronger for regulation and effective use of emotions. Considering that these
aspects of emotional intelligence are related to effective performance, this
research has contributed by finding personality traits that affect these two
dimensions. In addition, Y generation was asked for their self-perceptions with
Rogers’ Q sort measure. According to findings, they scored better in positive
aspects and less in negative aspects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Personality, Emotional Intelligence, Y Generation

KİŞİLİK VE DUYGUSAL ZEKA: Y KUŞAĞIYLA İLGİLİ BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı Y kuşağının çeşitli özelliklerini
anlamaktır. Araştırmanın örneklemini İstanbul’daki çeşitli devlet
üniversitelerinden kolayda örneklemeyle 237 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada,
Costa & McCrea’nın Beş Büyük Kişilik Envanterinden geliştirilen Johnson’un
(2014)’un 120 maddelik formu, Wong & Law’ın duygusal zekâ ölçeği (2002) ve
Rogers’ın Q sort ölçeği (1961) kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar duygusal zekâ ile
kişilik özellikleri arasında istatistiki anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu ortaya
koymuştur. Duyguların etkili kullanımı sorumlulukla olumlu korelasyon ve
duyguların düzenlenmesi nevrotiklik ile olumsuz korelasyon göstermiştir ve
diğer korelasyonlara göre daha güçlüdür. Duygusal zekanın tüm boyutlarıyla
anlamlı ve olumlu korelasyona sahip olan kişilik boyutları dışa dönüklük ve
açıklık/deneyime açıklık olarak bulunmuştur. Kişilik özelliklerinin duygusal
zekâ üzerindeki etkilerini anlamak için yapılan regresyon analizlerinde,
duyguların düzenlenmesi ve etkili kullanılmasında etkilerin istatistiki olarak
daha güçlü olduğu bulunmuştur. Duygusal zekanın bu yönlerinin etkili performans
göstermeyle ilişkili olduğu gerekli olarak dikkate alındığında, bu çalışma iki
boyuta etki eden kişilik özelliklerini bularak katkı sağlamıştır. Ayrıca, Y
kuşağına Rogers’ın Q sort ölçeği kullanılarak kendilerine yönelik algıları
sorulmuştur. Bulgulara göre, Y kuşağı kendisini olumlu özelliklerde daha iyi,
olumsuz özellikleri daha az puanlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kişilik, Duygusal Zeka, Y Kuşağı

Kaynakça

• Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Costa, P.T. Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64 (1), 21-50.
• Deutschendorf, H. (2009). The Other Kind of Smart: Simple Ways to Boost Your Emotional Intelligence for Greater Personal Effectiveness and Success. American Management Association.
• Dlodlo, N. & Mahlangu, H. B. (2013). Using Mobile Devices for Recreation among the Millenial Generation. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 19 (4: 2), 874-890.
• Ewen, R. B. (2010). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. 7th Edition, Psychology Press.
• Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003) The Relationship between the Revised NeoPersonality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality, 31 (6), 577-584. Doi: 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577.
• Gardiner, S., Grace, D., & King, C. (2014). The Generation Effect: The Future of Domestic Tourism in Australia. Journal of Travel Research, 53 (6), 705-720, Doi: 10.1177/0047287514530810.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Isbasinda Duygusal Zekâ. 3. Basim. Varlik Yayinlari.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. 2016. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring Thirty Facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-Item Public Domain Inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003.
• Kong, H., Wang, S., & Fu, X. (2015). Meeting Career Expectation: Can It Enhance Job Satisfaction of Generation Y? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27 (1), 147-168.
• Libbrecht, N., Lievens, F. & Schollaert, E. (2010). Measurement Equivalence of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale Across Self and Other Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70 (6), 1007-1020. Doi: 10.1177/0013164410378090.
• McCrae, R. R. (2002). Cross Cultural Research on the Five-Factor Model of Personality. CrossCultural Research on the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4 (4), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1038.
• McCrae, R. R. & Costa, Jr, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Personality, 57 (1).
• McCrae, R. R. & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist, 52 (5), 509.
• Mihelcea, A., Sãvulescu, R., & Vitelar, A. (2013). Generation Y: Between a Civic and a Cultural European Identity. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 15, 2 (29), 61-75. Nusair, K. K., Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., & Cobanoglu, C. (2013). Generation Y Travelers’ Commitment to Online Social Network Websites. Tourism Management, 35, 13-22.
• Ordun ve Akün (2017). Self Actualization, Self Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence of Undergraduate Students. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 5 (3), 170-175, Doi: 10.18178/joams.5.3.170-175.
• A Self-Assessment Test for Congruence, Q Sort. Retrived from http://www.ryerson.ca/~glassman/Qsort.html.
• Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. A Therapist’s View of Psychotheraphy. Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Sundberg, G. (2013). Language Policy and Multilingual Identity in Sweden Through the Lens of Generation Y. Scandinavian Studies, 85 (2), 205-233.
• Terrell, J. B. & Hughes, M. (2008). A Coach’s Guide to Emotional Intelligence. Strategies for Developing Succesful Leaders. Pfeiffer Publish.
• Twenge, J. M. (2009). Ben Nesli. 2. Baski. Kaknus Psikoloji.
• Vieregge, M. & Quick, S. (2011). Cross-Cultural Negotiations Revisited. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18 (3), 313-326.
• Wolf, M. M., Carpenter, S., & Qenani-Petrela, E. (2005). A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California. Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(1), 186191.
• Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The Effects of Leader and Follower Emotional Intelligence on Performance and Attitude: An Exploratory Study. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243-274.
• Yuksekbilgili, Z. (2013). Turkish Type Y Generation. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12 (45), 342-353.
• Yuksekbilgili, Z. (2015). The Age of Interval of Y Generation in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (53), 259-267.
• Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Genarations at Work. Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace. Performance Research Associates, Inc.