Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 5 30 Nisan 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?

Öz

In today's globalized world, being innovative has become a top priority for many organizations. The knowledge-oriented sectors have started to gain much power and attention for the competing economies. Such developments give rise to new form of organizations named as “knowledge intensive firms (KIFs)” along with a new type of employee called as “knowledge worker.” Such workers use their brain power and think for a living unlike manual workers whose work is mostly based on physical tasks. Knowledge workers are generally work in knowledge intensive firms and use their theoretical and analytical skills to find   creative solutions to complex problems and dealing with uncertainty of knowledge creation through new product or service development. İn fact, the new knowledge and the products they create is not easy to replicate both inside and outside of organization. These workers are the most valuable assets of knowledge intensive organizations. Being expert and skillful gives knowledge workers the autonomy and control power on their job. Traditional approaches and leadership styles of managers are questioned and not welcomed in such settings. Therefore, the changing focus and the nature of these contemporary organizations unearthed new leadership styles and approaches for the executive officers. Interviews with managers and knowledge workers revealed that different managerial skills and leadership styles are favored depending on the organizational levels of managers doing leadership in knowledge intensive setting.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership,Managers,Knowledge Workers,And Knowledge Intensive Work

Kaynakça

  1. Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), pp.997-1015.
  2. Alvesson, M. (1995). Management of Knowledge-intensive companies. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  3. Alvesson, M. (2000). Social Identity and the Problem of Loyalty in Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), pp. 1101-1124.
  4. Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations. 54(7) pp. 863-886.
  5. Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford: Oxford University press.
  6. Alvesson, M. and Sveningson, S. (2003a). The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “Leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2003), pp. 359-381.
  7. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003b). Good Visions, Bad Micro-management and Ugly Ambiguity: Contradictions of (Non-) Leadership in a Knowledge-Intensive Organization. Organization Studies, 24(6), pp. 961-988.
  8. Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003c). Managers Doing Leadership: The Extra-coordinatization of the Mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), p. 1435-1459.
  9. Blackler, F. (1996). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(1995), pp.1021-1046.
  10. Beever, Charley Patterson, Anna Rotz, Greg Vlak, A. (2010). The Missing Link in Pharmaceutical R&D. Retrieved from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/The_Missing_Link.pdf.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mutlu, M. D. (2019). COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS? R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 2(5), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.550439
AMA
1.Mutlu MD. COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS? R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2019;2(5):149-160. doi:10.33723/rs.550439
Chicago
Mutlu, Mustafa Doruk. 2019. “COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 2 (5): 149-60. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.550439.
EndNote
Mutlu MD (01 Nisan 2019) COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS? R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 2 5 149–160.
IEEE
[1]M. D. Mutlu, “COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?”, R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, c. 2, sy 5, ss. 149–160, Nis. 2019, doi: 10.33723/rs.550439.
ISNAD
Mutlu, Mustafa Doruk. “COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal 2/5 (01 Nisan 2019): 149-160. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.550439.
JAMA
1.Mutlu MD. COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS? R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 2019;2:149–160.
MLA
Mutlu, Mustafa Doruk. “COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?”. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, c. 2, sy 5, Nisan 2019, ss. 149-60, doi:10.33723/rs.550439.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Doruk Mutlu. COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS? R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal. 01 Nisan 2019;2(5):149-60. doi:10.33723/rs.550439