COMPARING MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE CONTEXT: HOW LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STYLES DIFFERS AMONG ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS?
Öz
In today's globalized world,
being innovative has become a top priority for many organizations. The knowledge-oriented
sectors have started to gain much power and attention for the competing
economies. Such developments give rise to new form of organizations named as
“knowledge intensive firms (KIFs)” along with a new type of employee called as
“knowledge worker.” Such workers use their brain power and think for a living
unlike manual workers whose work is mostly based on physical tasks. Knowledge
workers are generally work in knowledge intensive firms and use their
theoretical and analytical skills to find creative solutions to
complex problems and dealing with uncertainty of knowledge creation through new
product or service development. İn fact, the new knowledge and the products
they create is not easy to replicate both inside and outside of organization. These
workers are the most valuable assets of knowledge intensive organizations.
Being expert and skillful gives knowledge workers the autonomy and control
power on their job. Traditional approaches and leadership styles of
managers are questioned and not welcomed in such settings. Therefore, the
changing focus and the nature of these contemporary organizations unearthed new
leadership styles and approaches for the executive officers. Interviews with
managers and knowledge workers revealed that different managerial skills and
leadership styles are favored depending on the organizational levels of
managers doing leadership in knowledge intensive setting.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Leadership,Managers,Knowledge Workers,And Knowledge Intensive Work
Kaynakça
- Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), pp.997-1015.
- Alvesson, M. (1995). Management of Knowledge-intensive companies. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Alvesson, M. (2000). Social Identity and the Problem of Loyalty in Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), pp. 1101-1124.
- Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations. 54(7) pp. 863-886.
- Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford: Oxford University press.
- Alvesson, M. and Sveningson, S. (2003a). The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “Leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2003), pp. 359-381.
- Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003b). Good Visions, Bad Micro-management and Ugly Ambiguity: Contradictions of (Non-) Leadership in a Knowledge-Intensive Organization. Organization Studies, 24(6), pp. 961-988.
- Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003c). Managers Doing Leadership: The Extra-coordinatization of the Mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), p. 1435-1459.
- Blackler, F. (1996). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(1995), pp.1021-1046.
- Beever, Charley Patterson, Anna Rotz, Greg Vlak, A. (2010). The Missing Link in Pharmaceutical R&D. Retrieved from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/The_Missing_Link.pdf.