Araştırma Makalesi

Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features

Öz

Image fusion is one of the most common techniques used to enhance the interpretability and functionality of remotely sensed data. The aim of this study was to improve the performance of the SVM (Support Vector Machines) classifier with the aid of texture features (TF) extracted from fused images. As a first step, the spatial resolution of the WorldView-2 MS (multispectral) imagery was increased by fusing it with a WorldView-2 PAN (panchromatic) image using the PCA (Principal Component Analysis), WSB (Wavelet Single Band), GS (Gram-Schmidt), BRV (Brovey), EHL (Ehlers), HCS (Hyperspherical Colour Space), HPF (High-Pass Filtering) and MCV (Multiplicative) algorithms. A PCA transform was then applied on all fused images. The first principal component obtained from each fused image was used to extract the Gabor TFs. As a final step, extracted Gabor TFs were combined with the original MS image. Resultant images were classified with the SVM algorithm to investigate to what degree the used methodology affect the classification accuracy. The results showed that the GS fusion-based Gabor TFs provided the greatest classification accuracy increase with 19.3%, whereas the PCA fusion-based Gabor TFs resulted in the second best classification accuracy increase with 18.7%.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Texture feature extraction,Image fusion,Gabor texture features,Principal component analysis,Image classification

Kaynakça

  1. Acerbi-Junior, F. W., Clevers, J. G. P. W., & Schaepman, M. E. (2006). The assessment of multi-sensor image fusion using wavelet transforms for mapping the Brazilian Savanna. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4), 278-288. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2006.01.001.
  2. Akar, Ö. & Güngör, O. (2015). Integrating multiple texture methods and NDVI to the Random Forest classification algorithm to detect tea and hazelnut plantation areas in northeast Turkey. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(2), 442-464. doi:10.1080/01431161.2014.995276.
  3. Almendros-Jiménez, J. M., Domene, L., & Piedra-Fernandez, J. A. (2012). A framework for ocean satellite image classification based on ontologies. IEEE Journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, 6(2), 1048-1063. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2217479.
  4. Angelo, N. P., & Haertel, V. (2003). On the application of Gabor filtering in supervised image classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(10), 2167-2189. doi:10.1080/01431160210163146.
  5. Augusteijn, M. F., Clemens, L. E., & Shaw, K. A. (1995). Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(3), 616-626. doi:10.1109/36.387577.
  6. Baraldi, A., & Panniggiani, F. (1995). An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(2), 293-304. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1995.8746010.
  7. Bigdeli, M., Vakilian, M., & Rahimpour, E. (2012). Transformer winding faults classification based on transfer function analysis by support vector machine. IET Electric Power Applications, 6(5), 268-276. doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2011.0232.
  8. Butusov, O. B. (2003). Textural classification of forest types from Landsat 7 imagery. Mapping Sciences and Remote Sensing, 40(2), 91-104. doi:10.2747/0749-3878.40.2.91.
  9. Chavez, A., & Kwarteng, P. (1989). Extracting spectral contrast in Landsat Thematic Mapper image data using selective principal component analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 339-348.
  10. Chen, K. S., Yen, S. K., & Tsay, D. W. (1997). Neural classification of SPOT imagery through integration of intensity and fractal information. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(4), 763-783. doi:10.1080/014311697218746.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, Ç., & Güngör, O. (2020). Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi, 1(1), 34-44. https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL
AMA
1.Şerifoğlu Yılmaz Ç, Güngör O. Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features. Turk J Remote Sens GIS. 2020;1(1):34-44. https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL
Chicago
Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, Çiğdem, ve Oguz Güngör. 2020. “Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features”. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi 1 (1): 34-44. https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL.
EndNote
Şerifoğlu Yılmaz Ç, Güngör O (01 Mart 2020) Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi 1 1 34–44.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Şerifoğlu Yılmaz ve O. Güngör, “Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features”, Turk J Remote Sens GIS, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 34–44, Mar. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL
ISNAD
Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, Çiğdem - Güngör, Oguz. “Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features”. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi 1/1 (01 Mart 2020): 34-44. https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL.
JAMA
1.Şerifoğlu Yılmaz Ç, Güngör O. Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features. Turk J Remote Sens GIS. 2020;1:34–44.
MLA
Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, Çiğdem, ve Oguz Güngör. “Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features”. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi, c. 1, sy 1, Mart 2020, ss. 34-44, https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL.
Vancouver
1.Çiğdem Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, Oguz Güngör. Improving SVM Classification Accuracy with Image Fusion-Based Gabor Texture Features. Turk J Remote Sens GIS [Internet]. 01 Mart 2020;1(1):34-4. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA29EN37XL