Assessment of Burned Area and Fire Severity Using Sentinel-2 Imagery: Case Studies from Türkiye’s Summer 2025 Wildfires

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 300 - 314, 27.09.2025

Çiğdem Şerifoğlu Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1751391

Öz

This study examines five major wildfires in Türkiye during the summer of 2025 (Aliaga-Foca, Seferihisar-Menderes, Akhisar, Tarakli-Geyve-Golpazari, and Antakya) using Sentinel-2 imagery. Burned areas and fire severity were assessed with Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR), differenced NBR (dNBR), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Burn severity mapping was complemented by analyses of pre-fire vegetation stress, wind dynamics, and topographic factors influencing fire spread. Results were validated against European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) data. Findings confirm that Sentinel-2 dNBR captured both the extent and severity of fire damage, showing consistency with EFFIS estimates. The most accurate results were achieved for Aliağa-Foça, Akhisar and Taraklı-Geyve-Gölpazarı. Seferihisar-Menderes (96.13 km²) and Tarakli-Geyve-Golpazari (61.31 km²) experienced the largest and most severe fires, marked by heterogeneous burn patterns. Notably, the strongest pre-fire drought signal did not align with the largest fire, underscoring the key role of real-time weather, fuel availability, and topography in shaping fire size and spread. For visual interpretation, False Colour Composite (FCC) imagery outperformed True Colour Composite (TCC) and NDVI. Overall, results highlight the effectiveness of Sentinel-2 and dNBR-based methods for post-fire monitoring and their importance for fire management under growing climate-related fire risks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wildfires , Burned area mapping , Burn severity , Sentinel-2 , Remote sensing

Sentinel-2 Görüntüleri Kullanılarak Yanmış Alan ve Yangın Şiddetinin Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye 2025 Yazı Orman Yangınlarından Örnekler

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2025 yazında Türkiye’de meydana gelen beş büyük orman yangınını (Aliağa-Foça, Seferihisar-Menderes, Akhisar, Taraklı-Geyve-Gölpazarı ve Antakya) Sentinel-2 görüntüleri kullanarak incelemektedir. Yanmış alanlar ve yangın şiddeti, Normalize Yanıklık Oranı (NBR), fark alınmış NBR (dNBR) ve Normalize Bitki Örtüsü İndeksi (NDVI) üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Yangın şiddeti haritalaması, yangın yayılımını etkileyen yangın öncesi bitki örtüsü stresi, rüzgâr dinamikleri ve topoğrafik faktörlerin analizi ile desteklenmiştir. Sonuçlar, Avrupa Orman Yangını Bilgi Sistemi (EFFIS) verileri ile doğrulanmıştır. Bulgular, Sentinel-2 dNBR yönteminin yangın hasarının boyutunu ve şiddetini ortaya koyduğunu ve EFFIS tahminleri ile uyum gösterdiğini kanıtlamaktadır. En doğru sonuçlar Aliağa-Foça, Akhisar ve Taraklı-Geyve-Gölpazarı için elde edilmiştir. Seferihisar-Menderes (96.13 km²) ve Taraklı-Geyve-Gölpazarı (61.31 km²) en geniş ve en şiddetli alanları kapsayarak heterojen yanıklık desenleri sergilemiştir. İlginç bir şekilde, en güçlü kuraklık sinyali en büyük yangınla örtüşmemiştir; bu durum yangın boyutu ve yayılımında anlık meteoroloji, yakıt mevcudiyeti ve topoğrafyanın kritik rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Görsel yorumlamada Sahte Renk Kombinasyon görüntülerinin, Gerçek Renk Kombinasyon ve NDVI’dan daha etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Genel olarak sonuçlar, Sentinel-2 ve dNBR tabanlı yöntemlerin farklı iklim ve ekolojik bölgelerde yangın sonrası izleme için uygunluğunu ve iklim kaynaklı artan yangın riskleri karşısında yönetim açısından önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orman yangınları , Yanmış alanların tespiti , Yangın şiddeti , Sentinel-2 , Uzaktan algılama

Kaynakça

• Achour, H., Toujani, A., Trabelsi, H., & Jaouadi, W. (2022). Evaluation and comparison of Sentinel-2 MSI, Landsat 8 OLI, and EFFIS data for forest fires mapping. Illustrations from the summer 2017 fires in Tunisia. Geocarto International, 37, 7021–7040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1980118.
• Altun, N. (2006). Urla–Seferihisar (İzmir) bölgesinin jeolojisi ve toprak özellikleri [Uzmanlık tezi, T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ege Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü]. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/egearastirma/yayinlarimiz/muhtelif-yayinlar
• Atak, B. K., & Tonyaloğlu, E. E. (2020). Evaluating spectral indices for estimating burned areas in the case of Izmir / Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 8, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.657253
• Atalay, İ., & Mortan, K. (2011). Türkiye bölgesel coğrafyası. İnkılap Kitabevi.
• Bitek, D., Sanli, F. B., & Erenoglu, R. C. (2025). Spatial and statistical analysis of burned areas with Landsat-8/9 and Sentinel-2 satellites: 2023 Çanakkale forest fires. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13474-5.
• Boer, M. M., Macfarlane, C., Norris, J., Sadler, R. J., Wallace, J., & Grierson, P. F. (2008). Mapping burned areas and burn severity patterns in SW Australian eucalypt forest using remotely-sensed changes in leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(12), 4358–4369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.005.
• Çelik, M. Ç., & Karabulut, M. (2014). Antakya–Kahramanmaraş Grabeninde Kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.) orman alanları ile yağış arasındaki ilişkilerin MODIS verileri (2000–2010) kullanılarak incelenmesi. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000152.
• Chu, T., & Guo, X. (2014). Remote sensing techniques in monitoring post-fire effects and patterns of forest recovery in boreal forest regions: A review. Remote Sensing, 6, 470–520. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6010470
• Chuvieco, E., Riaño, D., Danson, F. M., & Martin, P. (2006). Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 111, Article G04S09. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000143
• European Forest Fire Information System. (2025). Welcome to EFFIS. Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
• Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., & Alsdorf, D. (2007). The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2), Article RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183
• Filipponi, F. (2019). Exploitation of Sentinel-2 time series to map burned areas at the national level: A case study on the 2017 Italy wildfires. Remote Sensing, 11, Article 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060622
• Gülci, S., Yüksel, K., Gümüş, S., & Wing, M. (2021). Mapping wildfires using Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat 8 imagery: Spatial data generation for forestry. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 7, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1031090
• Henner, D. N., & Kirchengast, G. (2025). Forest fire risk under climate change in Austria and comparable European regions. Trees, Forests and People, 20, Article 100889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100889
• Ibrahim, S., Kose, M., Adamu, B., & Jega, I. M. (2025). Remote sensing for assessing the impact of forest fire severity on ecological and socio-economic activities in Kozan District, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 15, 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00951-z
• İkiel, C. (2018). Sakarya’nın fiziki, beşeri ve iktisadi coğrafya özellikleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi.
• Jin, S., & Sader, S. A. (2005). Comparison of time series Tasseled Cap Wetness and the Normalized Difference Moisture Index in detecting forest disturbances. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94(3), 364–372.
• Kendall, M. G. (1948). Rank correlation methods. Griffin, Oxford, England.
• Key, C. H., & Benson, N. C. (2006). Landscape assessment: Sampling and analysis methods. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD, Ogden.
• Kobayashi, S., & Sanga-Ngoie, K. (2008). The integrated radiometric correction of optical remote sensing imageries. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 5957–5985.
• Kurnaz, B., Bayik, C., & Abdikan, S. (2020). Forest fire area detection by using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite images: A case study in Mugla, Turkey. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-26787/v1
• Lentile, L. B., Holden, Z. A., Smith, A. M., Falkowski, M. J., Hudak, A. T., Morgan, P., Lewis, S. A., Gessler, P. E., & Benson, N. C. (2006). Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15(3), 319–345.
• Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13, 245–259.
• Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. (2025). 2025 Yılı Haziran Ayı Ortalama Sıcaklıklarının 1991–2020 Normallerine Göre Mukayesesi. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://www.mgm.gov.tr/
• Misseyanni, A., Christopoulou, A., Kougkoulos, I., Vassilakis, E., & Arianoutsou, M. (2025). The impact of forest fires on ecosystem services: The case of Greece. Forests, 16(3), Article 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030533
• Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., ... & Thépaut, J.-N. (2021). ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth System Science Data, 13(9), 4349–4383.
• Öncü, G., & Çorumluoğlu, Ö. (2023). Determination of spatial distribution of damage intensity of Tınazlı-İzmir forest fire using remote sensing indexing techniques. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 10, 151–158.
• Pekel, J. F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584
• Robichaud, P. R., Lewis, S. A., Laes, D. Y., Hudak, A. T., Kokaly, R. F., & Zamudio, J. A. (2007). Postfire soil burn severity mapping with hyperspectral image unmixing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.027
• Şerifoğlu Yılmaz, C. (2024). Assessing air pollutant emissions in the aftermath of the 2021 forest fires in Marmaris and Manavgat, Türkiye: Insights from satellite-based monitoring. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-329-2024
• Soydan, O. (2022). Detection of burnt areas by remote sensing techniques: Antalya Manavgat forest fire. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 10, 3029–3035. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10isp2.3029-3035.5764
• Tonbul, H. (2024). Google Earth Engine ile Türkiye’de yanmış alanların MODIS ve FireCCI51 küresel yanmış alan uydu gözlem verileriyle karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi, 5(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1410382
• Turco, M., Herrera, S., Tourigny, E., Chuvieco, E., & Provenzale, A. (2019). A comparison of remotely-sensed and inventory datasets for burned area in Mediterranean Europe. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 82, Article 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.05.020
• U.S. Geological Survey. (2025). SRTM mission. Retrieved September 5, 2025, from https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/ science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm
• Vittucci, C., Cordari, F., Guerriero, L., & Di Sanzo, P. (2025). Design and evaluation of a cloud-oriented procedure based on SAR and multispectral data to detect burnt areas. Earth Science Informatics, 18(3), Article 322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01829-6
• Wang, L., Qu, J. J., Hao, X., & Hunt, E. R., Jr. (2011). Estimating dry matter content from spectral reflectance for green leaves of different species. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 7097–7109.