The problematisation of Romantic genius in Peter Ackroyd’s The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein

Abstract

Peter Ackroyd’s novel The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, as a postmodern intertextual novel, reimagines and rewrites Mary Shelley’s seminal novel Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus, by putting its titular character in the historical conditions in which Mary Shelley composed her narrative. It is proposed in the study that in Ackroyd’s novel, Victor Frankenstein is imagined as a Romantic genius figure who is inspired by the Romantic poets of the early 19th century Britain. This study aims to show how Ackroyd’s portrayal of Victor Frankenstein as a Romantic artist problematises the very concept of Romantic genius by exposing the shortcomings of genius figures and their lack of self-perception. The concept of genius is discussed by referencing to the Romantic tradition in the British literature and it is inspected how Ackroyd’s postmodern novel decentralises the genius figures, by depicting them as productions of a class-conscious society. It is discussed that these historical figures are socially constructed figures who, behind all their idolisations, are fallible human beings. The discussion is expanded by examining the postmodern inclinations of the text which recontextualises the Frankenstein myth. This article questions whether a historical narrative can be considered as valid in a postmodern era in which meaning perpetually multiplies.

Keywords

• Peter Ackroyd
• Postmodernism
• Romanticism
• Intertextuality
• Historical Fiction

Kaynakça

1. Abrams, M. H. (1971). The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford University Press.
2. Ackroyd, P. (2009). The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein. Vintage Books.
3. Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. Routledge.
4. Chalupský, P. (2011). Frankenstein as an historical, urban Gothic psycho-thriller – Peter Ackroyd’s rendering of Mary Shelley’s classic in The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein. Ars Aeterna, 3(1), 19-34.
5. Fay, E. (2012). Author. In J. Faflak & J. M. Wright (Eds.), A Handbook of Romanticism Studies (pp. 107-124.) Wiley-Blackwell.
6. Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans) Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1976)
7. Foucault, M. (2010). Truth and Power. (C. Gordon& L. Marshall& J. Mepham& K. Soper, Trans). In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133.) Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1977)
8. Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in Second Degree. (C Newman & C. Dobinsky, Trans.) University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1982)

9. Hewitt, M. (2004). Class and the Classes. In C. Williams (Ed.), A Companion to Nineteenth Century Britain (pp. 305-320.) Blackwell Publishing.
10. Hutcheon, L. (1988) A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory Fiction. Routledge.
11. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.) University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
12. Miquel-Baldellou, M. (2017). ‘Are you being serious, Frankenstein?’ Transtextuality and Postmodern Tenets in Peter Ackroyd’s ‘The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 25, 191-07. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5209/CJES.53353.
13. Shelley, M. (1994). Frankenstein. Penguin.
14. Wordsworth, W. & Coleridge, S. T. (2013). Lyrical Ballads: 1798 and 1802, edited by. Fiona Stafford, Oxford University Press.