Araştırma Makalesi

The Problematic Criticism of the Post-Truth Pro-Iraq War Discourse in Gregory Burke’s Black Watch

Sayı: 38 21 Şubat 2024
PDF İndir
EN

The Problematic Criticism of the Post-Truth Pro-Iraq War Discourse in Gregory Burke’s Black Watch

Abstract

Changing parameters in people’s perception of truth have taken on a different dimension, especially in the last century. The consideration of a person’s emotional connection to an idea, instead of objective truths, in accepting an opinion as true has led to the emergence of the concept of post-truth. Before and during the 2003 Iraq War, politicians, opinion leaders, civilians and state institutions tried to guide people through emotional manipulation through post-truth discourses. In the field of art, this situation is criticized in the plays written about the war. For instance, Gregory Burke exposes the post-truth discourse of the military institution in his play Black Watch. The historical and contemporary figures he creates in the play mislead soldiers by talking about the virtue of fighting. The discourses they use for this purpose are generally shaped around dreams of heroism, fame, wealth and charisma. They persuade people to fight by making ostentatious promises, but the only things war brings are death and psychological destruction. Burke vividly depicts the dangers the soldiers face in Iraq and the disappointments they experience upon returning home. However, he also criticizes the military institution for its pro-war post-truth narratives by utilizing a post-truth discourse himself. Since he takes an anti-war stance, he is not objective in his depictions and narratives. Due to this contradiction, the playwright’s criticism has a self-contradictory structure. Based on this argument, this article first analyses how the post-truth discourse of the military institution is revealed in the play, and then how the counter-arguments are similarly imposed by the playwright, and claims that the writer’s challenge with post-truth is problematic.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Archibald, D. (2008). “We’re just big bullies …” Gregory Burke’s Black Watch. The Drought, 26, 8-13.
  2. Beck, S. (2013). Playing War: Encountering Soldiers and Navigating Ethical Responsibilities in the Creation of Black Watch. International Journal of Scottish Theatre and Screen, 6/1, 131-153.
  3. Betts, J, and M. Phythian. (2020). The Iraq War and Democratic Governance: Britain and Australia go to War. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Brantley, B. (2007, Oct. 24). To Tell These War Stories, Words Aren’t Enough. The New York Times. .
  5. Brown, M. (2009, Mar. 9). From Drill Hall to Olivier Glory: Acclaimed War Play Black Watch Takes Four Awards. The Guardian. .
  6. Burke, G. (2008). Black Watch. London: Faber & Faber.
  7. Bush, G. W. (2001, Sep. 20). Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People. The White House: President George W. Bush. .
  8. Cummings, L. B. (2011). Empathy, Estrangement, and Theatre for Social Change [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cornell University.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

İngiliz ve İrlanda Dili, Edebiyatı ve Kültürü

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Şubat 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Kasım 2023

Kabul Tarihi

26 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Sayı: 38

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çağan, G. (2024). The Problematic Criticism of the Post-Truth Pro-Iraq War Discourse in Gregory Burke’s Black Watch. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 38, 1406-1420. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1410303