Araştırma Makalesi

An examination of differences between genders, academic majors and grade levels of language learners on the use of language learning strategies

Sayı: Ö8 21 Kasım 2020
  • Ülkü Kölemen *
PDF İndir
TR EN

An examination of differences between genders, academic majors and grade levels of language learners on the use of language learning strategies

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the second language learning strategy use, academic major, gender and grade level. 252 Bosnian university students studying in Bosnia and Herzegovina participated in the study. The research data were collected from two inventories: an individual background questionnaire and the Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL) (Oxford, 1990). To analyze the data, the descriptive quantitative method was used. Descriptive and referential statistics were reported by taking gender (males vs females), academic major (education vs engineering vs economics) and grade levels ( freshmen, sophomores vs juniors) as the variables. The results indicated that the males employed different types of strategies more frequently than the females. In terms of the academic majors, statistically significant differences were found: The students majoring in economics preferred memory, compensation and social strategies while students majoring in engineering preferred affective, metacognitive and cognitive ones more. Students majoring in the field of education preferred all the strategy types the least. The grade level was found to be statistically insignificant on the use of the language learning strategies of the Bosnian university students. The results provided significant practical and pedagogical implications regarding language learning and teaching, understanding the role of individual differences in language education.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abbasian, R., Khajavi, Y. & Mardani, A. (2012). Language learning strategies of Iranian EFL learners: Are gender and educational level important? Academic Research International, Vol. 3(2) Retrieved from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.3(2)/2012(3.2-46).pdf
  2. Akın, H. & Çetin, M. (2016). Cinsiyet Faktörünün Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğrenim Stratejilerine Etkisi (Bosna Hersek Örneği). Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 1021-1032.
  3. Aliakbari, M. & Hayatzadeh, A. (2008). Variation of language strategies among Iranian English students: The effect of gender. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 72-87.
  4. Božinović, N. & Sindik, J. (2011). Gender differences in the use of learning strategies in adult foreign language learners. Metodički obzori 6(1).
  5. Cesur, O. (2008). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı örgencilerinin yabancı dil öğrenme stratejileri, öğrenme stili tercihi ve yabancı dil akademik başarısı arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı ilişkiler örüntüsü. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
  6. Chamot, A. U. & O'Malley, J. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
  7. Charoento, M. (2017). Individual Learner Differences and Language Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal. 7(57) Doi: 10.18844/cerj.v7i2.875.
  8. Chou, Y. (2002). An exploratory study of language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and language proficiency among EFL Taiwanese technological and vocational college students. PhD Dissertation. University of Iowa.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Dilbilim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ülkü Kölemen * Bu kişi benim
0000-0003-4907-9074
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Kasım 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Eylül 2020

Kabul Tarihi

20 Kasım 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Sayı: Ö8

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kölemen, Ü. (2020). An examination of differences between genders, academic majors and grade levels of language learners on the use of language learning strategies. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ö8, 563-582. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.816957