T.S. Eliot James Joyce hakkında haklı mıydı?: Ulysses’in ezber bozan bir okuması

Yıl 2020, Sayı: Ö8, 641 - 657, 21.11.2020

Meltem Uzunoğlu Erten Murat Göç

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.816920

Öz

Mitlerin modern yazarlar tarafından kullanılması, buna “mitsel yöntem” adını veren ve James Joyce’un Ulysses romanını öne çıkan bir örnek olarak gösteren T.S. Eliot tarafından oldukça övülmüştür. Ulysses, Order and Myth isimli ünlü makalesinde, T.S. Eliot yalnızca Joyce’a yöneltilen eleştirileri cevaplamakla kalmamış fakat aynı zamanda mitlerin kaos ve kargaşaya karşı savaşlarında modern yazarların ihtiyaç duyduğu tek silah olduğunu da iddia etmiştir. Bununla birlikte, Eliot tarafından böyle ateşli bir şekilde savunulmasına rağmen Joyce’un bu muazzam eserini yazarken benzer bir amaca sahip olup olmadığı da tartışmaya açıktır. Ulysses’i yazarken Joyce Odyssey destanını kitabının kurgusunun belkemiği olarak kullanmış ve aynı zamanda açık biçimde destanın karakterlerine göndermelerde bulunmuştur. Yine de dikkatli bir bakış Eliot’un yorumları ve anlayışının ötesinde birşeyleri ortaya dökebilir. Bunun nedeni eser içinde din, milliyetçilik ve ataerkil düzene yöneltilen ve Batı geleneğinin baskın ideolojilerini ve kurumlarını tamamen ters yüz eden parodilerle karşılaşmamızdır. Joyce yalnızca batı düşüncesinin derinlerine kök salmış mitleri ters yüz etmekle kalmaz aynı zamanda sömürgeciler tarafından boynuna dolanan bir boyunduruk olarak nitelediği dili de yıkıma uğratır. Dahası, yarattığı karakterler kimliklerin çoğaldığı ve karıştığı, aynı zamanda sınırların ve büyük anlatıların yok edildiği geleceğin dünyasını sembolize etmektedirler. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma Eliot’un muhafazakar ve gelenekçi beklentilerinin aksine Joyce’un Ulysses’de kullandığı yıkıcı tavra ve Joyce’un insanlığın geleceği olduğuna inandığı “yeni insan” ile ilgili fikirlerine odaklanmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

James Joyce, T.S. Eliot, mit, mitsel yöntem, yıkıcılık

Was T.S. Eliot right about James Joyce?: A Subversive reading of Ulysses

Öz

The employment of myth among modern writers was highly praised by T.S.Eliot who pointed at James Joyce’s Ulysses as an outstanding example of what he called “the mythical method”. In his famous essay entitled Ulysses, Order and Myth, he not only answered the criticism directed at Joyce but also claimed that myth was the one and the only weapon needed by the modern writers in their battle against chaos and anarchy. However, although defended by Eliot in such fierce attitude, it is a question whether Joyce shared a similar purpose in writing his massive work. In Ulysses, Joyce uses the epic of Odyssey as the backbone of his plot while he clearly refers to the epic characters at the same time. Yet a careful look reveals something beyond Eliot’s comments and understanding for we come across with a parodical approach towards religion, nationalism and the patriarchal order throughout the work, which totally subvert the dominant ideologies and established institutions of Western tradition. Joyce subverts not only myths that are deeply rooted in western mind but also language which he regards as a yoke put around his neck by the colonizer. Furthermore, his characters stand as the symbols of a future world where identities are multiplied and mingled whereas borders and metanarratives are destroyed. As a result, this paper aims to focus on Joyce’s subversive attitude in Ulysses contrary to the conservative and traditionalist expectations of Eliot and on Joyce’s suggestions on the “new man” who he believes is the future of mankind.

Anahtar Kelimeler

James Joyce, T.S. Eliot, myth, the mythical method, subversion

Kaynakça

• Arkins, B. (1999). Greek and Roman Themes in Joyce. USA: The Edwin Mellen Press.
• Bakhtin, M. M. and Emerson, C. (ed.), (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, (Trans: Caryl Emerson). USA: University of Minnesota Press.
• Barber, B. A. (1983-4). “Appropriation/Expropriation: Convention or Intervention”, Parachute, 33, 29-39.
• Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies, (Trans: Annette Lavers). New York: The Noonday Press.
• Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation, (Trans: Sheila Faria Glaser). USA: University of Michigan Press.
• Blanning, T.C.W. (ed.), (1996). The Oxford Illustrated History of Modern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bradbury, M. and James McFarlane. (ed), (1991). Modernism 1890-1930. England: Penguin Books.
• Booker, M. K. (1991). Techniques of Subversion in Modern Literature: Transgression, Abjection, and the Carnivalesque. USA: University of Florida Press.
• Booker, M. K. (1997). Joyce, Bakhtin, and the Literary Tradition: Toward a Comparative Cultural Poetics. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
• Borach, G. and J. Prescott. (1954). “Conversations with James Joyce”, College English, Volume 15, No. 16: National Council of Teachers of English, 325-327.
• Castle, G. (2001). Modernism and the Celtic Revival. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Coupe, L. (2009). Myth: The New Critical Idiom. USA: Routledge.
• Csapo, E. (2009). Theories of Mythology. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Dentith, S. (2002). Parody. Taylor & Francis e-Library...................
• Downes, G. J. (2006). “Indifferent Weib”: Giordano Bruno and the Heretical Mode of Vision in “Penelope”, Joyce, “Penelope” and the Body (European Joyce Studies 17) (ed. Richard Brown), Rodopi: Amsterdam and New York.
• Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary Theory. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Eco, U. (1989). The Middle Ages of James Joyce: The Aesthetics of Chaosmos, (Trans: Ellen Esrock). UK: Hutchinson Radius.
• Eliot, T. S. (1950). “Tradition and the Individual Talent”, The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Methuen & Co. Ltd.
• Eliot, T. S. and Kermode, F. (ed.), (1988). “Ulysses, Order, and Myth”, Selected Prose of T.S. Eliot: The Centenary Edition 1888-1988. Harcourt Brace & Co.
• Ellmann, R. (1972). Ulysses on the Liffey. USA: Oxford University Press.
• Ellmann, R. (1982). James Joyce. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Ellmann, R. (ed.), (1992). Selected Letters of James Joyce. London: Faber and Faber.
• Faulkner, P. (1977). Modernism. Great Britain: Methuen & Co...............
• Gilbert, S. (1955). James Joyce’s Ulysses: A Study. New York: Vintage Books.
• Hewitt, D. (1988). English Fiction of the Early Modern Period 1890-1940. USA: Longman Inc.
• Homer. (1991). The Odyssey, (Trans: E.V. Rieu). England: Penguin Books.
• Hutcheon, L. (2000). A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. USA: Illinois.
• Hutcheon, L. (2004). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
• Joyce, J. (2010). Ulysses. Great Britain: Wordsworth Editions.....................
• Joyce, J. (2011). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Turkey: Pergamino Publishing.
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (2001). Myth and Meaning. London: Routledge.
• Morgan, K. (2004). Myth and Philosophy: From the Presocratics to Plato. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Onopa, R. (1973). “The End of Art as a Spiritual Project”, TriQuarterly, No. 26, 363.
• Parry, A. M. (1966). Have we Homer’s Iliad?. Yale University Press. ...................
• Parrinder, P. (1984). James Joyce. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
• Parsons, D. (2007). Theorists of the Modernist Novel: James Joyce, Dorothy Richardson, Virginia Woolf. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
• Rosenfield, C. (1967). Paradise of Snakes: An Archetypal Analysis of Conrad’s Political Novels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Schein, S.L. (1996). Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays. USA: Princeton Academic Press.
• Schwarz, D.R. (1987). Reading Joyce’s Ulysses. Great Britain: The Macmillan Press.
• Watts, C. (2010). “Introduction”, Ulysses. Great Britain: Wordsworth Editions................