Being and Greenness: Phenomenology of the Poetic Persona and Nature in Dylan Thomas’s Green Poems

Yıl 2024, Sayı: Ö14, 1101 - 1112, 21.03.2024

Fatma Karaaslan Özgü

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1455159

Öz

Ecopoetry, a relatively recent approach in ecocriticism, refers to nature poems which are closely linked to environmental issues. Deliberating nature in poetry is indeed not something new, yet, what is new in ecopoetry, which is a characteristic that discerns it from, especially Romantic poetry, is that it delineates the relationship between the human and non-human worlds. In other words, ecopoetry stands out from both contemporary nature poetry and Romanticist poetry. It is characterized by the eco-centric view it provides, which axiomatically brings with it the principle of reciprocity, interrelationship, and egalitarianism. In this perspective one might argue that the majority of Dylan Thomas’s (1914-1953) nature poems could be rendered ecopoems as they see nature and natural phenomena as components of a unified and closely connected whole. In these poems Dylan Thomas’s poetic eye adopts an eco-centric verb tense and functions as a camera which record the harmonised movements of the poetic persona and the natural phenomena manifesting the intentionality of the eye of the ecopoet. Through this particular vision Dylan Thomas generates a place out of space in which both human and the other-than-human are deployed, thereby creating a specific subject-object relationship according to which the existence of the human and the non-human are interrelated. This study focuses on the ontological relationship between the poetic persona and nature and analyses the subject-object relationship in Thomas’s “Poem in October”, “The Force That Through the Green Fuse Drives the Flower”, and “Fern Hill” through the lens of phenomenology and object-oriented ontology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dylan Thomas, “Poem in October”, “The Force That Through the Green Fuse Drives the Flower”, “Fern Hill”, Phenomenology

Kaynakça

• Aivaz, D. (1950). The Poetry of Dylan Thomas. The Hudson Review, 3(3), 382-404. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3847455.
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A political ecology of things. London: Duke University Press.
• Berleant, A. (1988). Aesthetic perception in environmental design. In Jack L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 84-97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bryson, J. S. (2005). The west side of any mountain: place, space, and ecopoetry. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
• Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Crowell, S. (2012). Consciousness and Sartre’s existentialism. In Steven Crowell (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to existentialism (pp. 201-250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Daiches, D. (1954). The Poetry of Dylan Thomas. The English Journal, 43(7), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/809301.
• Fisher-Wirth, A. & Street, L. (2013). Preface. In Ann Fisher-Wirth & Laura-Gray Street (Eds.), The ecopoetry anthology (pp. xxvii-xxxi). Texas: Trinity University Press.
• Garrard, G. (2017). Environmental humanities: notes towards a summary for policymakers. In Ursula Hiese, Jon Christensen & Michelle Niemann (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the environmental humanities (pp. 462-472). Oxon: Routledge.
• Gifford, T. (1995). Green voices: understanding contemporary nature poetry. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Gilcrest, D. (2002). Greening the lyre: environmental poetics and ethics. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
• Goodby, J. (2017). Discovering Dylan Thomas: a companion to the collected poems and notebook poems. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
• Greenway, W. (1989). Dylan Thomas and the flesh’s vision. College Literature 16(3), 274-280. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111828.
• Harman, G. (2017). Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Penguin Books.
• Heaney, S. (1993). Dylan the durable? On Dylan Thomas. Salmagundi 100, 66-85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40548687.
• Hume, A. & Osborne, G. (2018). Ecopoetics: essays in the field. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
• Karaaslan, F. (2016). The prismatic reflection of human condition and irrationality of reality and existence in Memet Baydur’s Yalnızlığın Oyuncakları and Samuel Beckett’s Endgame (Publication No. 448216) [MA Dissertation, Ege University]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Lyon, T. J. (1996). A Taxonomy of nature writing. In Cheryll Glotfelty & Harold Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 276-282). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
• Sartre, J-P. (1993). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. (Hazel E. Barnes, Trans.). Washington: Washington Square Press. (Original work published 1943)
• Scigaj, L. M. (1999). Sustainable poetry: four American ecopoets. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
• Thomas, D. (1952). Dylan Thomas: collected poems 1934-1952. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
• Tuan, Y. (1990). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Tuan, Y. (2001). Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Walls, L. D. (2007). Seeking Common Ground: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities. In Annie
• Merrill Ingram, et. al. (Eds.), Coming into contact: explorations in ecocritical theory and Practice (pp. 199-208). Athens: University of Georgia Press.