BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Klinik dokümantasyon iyileştirme programı konusunda bir rehber

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 74 - 76, 01.04.2016

Öz

Klinik Belgelemenin alanı hekimlerin belgelerinden daha fazlasını kapsamak amacıyla geliştirildi.Şu an Klinik Belgeleme
laboratuvar raporlarını,teknisyen belgelerini , bakım belgelerini vb.içeriyor.Ayrıca Klinik Belgeleme , hastaya sunulan
bakımla diğer bakım ekibinin üyeleri arasındaki iletişimi kurar.Şu aralar tedarikçi kurumlar,teknoloji sağlayıcılar,kamusal
düzenleyiciler ve muhataplar gibi diğer paydaşlar doğrudan hasta bakımının haricinde Klinik Belgeleme sürecindeki
ek gereksinimlerdeki yerlerini aldı.Klinik Belgeleme Gelişim Programının amacı Klinik Belgeleme kalitesini artırmak
ve bu belgelemeye hasta bakımı gelişimi konusunda çok daha fazla verim kazandırmaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Andrews BF.(2002). Sir William Osler’s emphasis on physical diagnosis and listening to symptoms. Southern Medical Journal ,95(10),1173-7.
  • Thomson K, Peter B, Michael B, Thomas Y.(2015). Clinical Documentation in the 21st Century: Executive Summary of a Policy Position Paper from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine,162:301-303.
  • 3.AHIMA.(2003). Recruitment, Selection, and Orientation for CDI Specialists. Journal of AHIMA,84(7): 58-62.
  • Danzi JT, Masencup B, Brucker MA, Dixon-Lee C.(2000). Case study: clinical documentation improvement program supports coding accuracy. Topics in Health Information Management, 21(2): 24-9.
  • Pollard SE, Neri PM, Wilcox AR, Volk LA, Williams DH, Schiff GD, Ramelson HZ,et al. (2003).How physicians document outpatient visit notes in an electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics,82(1):39-46.
  • Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Middleton B.(2012).Method of electronic health record documentation and quality of primary care.Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6):1019-24.
  • Hayrinen K, Saranto K.(2010).Patients’ needs assessment documentation in multidisciplinary electronic health records. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,60(1):269-73.
  • Breuer S, Arquilla V.(2011). Clinical documentation improvement: focus on quality. Healthcare Financial Management,65(8):84-90.
  • Rudman WJ, Eberhardt JS, Pierce W, Hart-Hester S.(2009). Healthcare Fraud and Abuse. Perspectives in Health Information Management,6:1-24.
  • Rudman WJ, Eberhardt JS, Pierce W, Hart-Hester S.(2009). Healthcare fraud and abuse. Perspectives in Health Information Management.6:1g.
  • Jessica R, Karen P, Wallace J, Mike N.(2013). Validating Competence: A New Credential for Clinical Documentation Improvement Practitioners. Perspectives in Health Information Management,10:1g.

A primer on Clinical Documentation Improvement Program.

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 74 - 76, 01.04.2016

Öz

AbstractThe domain of Clinical Documentation (CD) has grown to encompass more than just physician notes. Now CD includes Laboratory reports, Operative notes, Nursing notes, etc.CD is also to communicate the care given to the patient to other members of the care team. Now other stakeholders like provider institutions, technology vendors, government regulators and payers have placed additional requirements on the CD process for purposes other than direct care of the patient. The aim of CD improvement program is to improve the quality of CD and to better use this documentation to improve patient care.

Kaynakça

  • Andrews BF.(2002). Sir William Osler’s emphasis on physical diagnosis and listening to symptoms. Southern Medical Journal ,95(10),1173-7.
  • Thomson K, Peter B, Michael B, Thomas Y.(2015). Clinical Documentation in the 21st Century: Executive Summary of a Policy Position Paper from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine,162:301-303.
  • 3.AHIMA.(2003). Recruitment, Selection, and Orientation for CDI Specialists. Journal of AHIMA,84(7): 58-62.
  • Danzi JT, Masencup B, Brucker MA, Dixon-Lee C.(2000). Case study: clinical documentation improvement program supports coding accuracy. Topics in Health Information Management, 21(2): 24-9.
  • Pollard SE, Neri PM, Wilcox AR, Volk LA, Williams DH, Schiff GD, Ramelson HZ,et al. (2003).How physicians document outpatient visit notes in an electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics,82(1):39-46.
  • Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Middleton B.(2012).Method of electronic health record documentation and quality of primary care.Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6):1019-24.
  • Hayrinen K, Saranto K.(2010).Patients’ needs assessment documentation in multidisciplinary electronic health records. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,60(1):269-73.
  • Breuer S, Arquilla V.(2011). Clinical documentation improvement: focus on quality. Healthcare Financial Management,65(8):84-90.
  • Rudman WJ, Eberhardt JS, Pierce W, Hart-Hester S.(2009). Healthcare Fraud and Abuse. Perspectives in Health Information Management,6:1-24.
  • Rudman WJ, Eberhardt JS, Pierce W, Hart-Hester S.(2009). Healthcare fraud and abuse. Perspectives in Health Information Management.6:1g.
  • Jessica R, Karen P, Wallace J, Mike N.(2013). Validating Competence: A New Credential for Clinical Documentation Improvement Practitioners. Perspectives in Health Information Management,10:1g.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Pavani Priyadarsini Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Priyadarsini, P. (2016). Klinik dokümantasyon iyileştirme programı konusunda bir rehber. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 3(2), 74-76. https://doi.org/10.5455/sad.13-1467646960
INDEX: “Index Copernicus, EBSCO Central & Eastern European Academic Source, EBSCO CINAHL,EuroPub, Sobiad, Asos Index, Turk Medline, Google Sholar, Dergipark,Türkiye Atıf Dizini ve Araştırmax...




Creative Commons License


Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmaktadır.