İnceleme Makalesi

A Comparative Analysis of Procedures Regarding the Selection and Training Processes of School Administrators: The Case of Finland, Germany, England and Türkiye

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 30 Ocak 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

A Comparative Analysis of Procedures Regarding the Selection and Training Processes of School Administrators: The Case of Finland, Germany, England and Türkiye

Abstract

In this study, the training and appointment processes of education administrators in Turkey were described together with the European countries Finland, Germany and England, and the differences and similarities between the practices were tried to be expressed. In the research, document analysis method was used; research articles related to the subject and the laws and regulations of the relevant country were examined and compared in the conclusion section. As a result, it is seen that the education administrators in the countries that are the subject of the research are generally chosen among those who have teaching qualifications. In other countries, except Turkey, the councils, municipalities and teachers established at the school have a say in the training and appointment of school administrators, and it is done locally by each school, not as a recruitment center. In Finland, England and Germany, school principals are trained before they come to work, while in Turkey, school principals are trained through in-service training and mostly individual efforts after they take office. This study reveals the similar and different aspects of the practices in different countries in terms of comparatively examining the selection and training procedures of school administrators in Turkey. In this context, it is aimed that the results of the study will help to improve the selection and training processes of educational administrators.

Keywords

selection of school administrators , education management , training of education administrators , quality management

Kaynakça

  1. Akkary, R. (2014). The role and role context of the school principal: toward a culturally grounded understanding of the principalship. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 718-742.
  2. Aktepe, V. (2014). Okul yöneticilerinin seçme ve yetiştirme uygulamalarına yönelik öğretmen ve yönetici görüşleri. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 89-105.
  3. Balcı, S. (2022). Türkiye’deki okul müdürü yetiştirme, seçme ve atama sürecinin PISA'da ilk sıralarda yer alan ülkelerle karşılaştırması. Atlas Journal, 2721-2737.
  4. Balyer, A., & Gündüz, Y. (2011). Değişik ülkelerde okul müdürlerinin yetiştirilmesi: Türk eğitim sistemi için bir model önerisi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 182-197.
  5. Basel Landschaft. (2023, 01 21). Systematische Sammlung. SGS 647.12 - Verordnung für die Schulleitung und die Schulsekretariate: https://bl.clex.ch/app/de/texts_of_law/647.12/versions/3364 adresinden alındı
  6. Bozkurt, N. (2005). Türkiye ile bazı Avrupa Birliği ülkelerindeki okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilme ve atanma süreçlerinin karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Türkiye.
  7. Chapman, J. D. (2005). Recruitment, retentionand development of school principals. IIEP & IAE.
  8. Çınkır, Ş. (2019). İngiltere’de mevcut okul müdürleri ve müdür adaylarına verilen eğitim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1145-1173.
  9. Dağ, L. (2015). Eğitim yöneticisi yetiştirme ve atama uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  10. Desforges, C. (2009). Foreword. A. Morris içinde, Evidence matters: Towards informed professionalism in education (s. i-iii). Reading, Berkshire: CIBT Education Trust.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ayhan, İ. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Procedures Regarding the Selection and Training Processes of School Administrators: The Case of Finland, Germany, England and Türkiye. Okul Yönetimi, 2(2), 147-158. https://izlik.org/JA37GL75JP