The Effect of Cervical Mechanical Intermittent Traction on Clinical and Functional Status in Patients with Cervical Disc Hernia

Öz

Introduction: Cervical disc hernia is common and costly to society. Physical modalities are often included in neck rehabilitation programs. Interventions may include thermal, electrotherapy, ultrasound, mechanical traction, laser and acupuncture. Definitive knowledge regarding mechanical ıntermittent traction for cervical disc hernia is limited. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical intermitant traction in addition to conventional treatment on pain, daily living activities, disability and functional status in the treatment of cervical disc hernia. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were included in the study. Study groups; Hotpack, TENS, Ultrasound and exercise (Group , n=17), Hotpack, TENS, Ultrasound, traction and exercise therapy (Group 2, n=22) and the only home program was determined as the control group (Group 3, n=21). In pre-and post-treatment, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NHQ) for functional status, Notthingham Health Profile (NHP) for health-related quality of life and Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPDI) for disability status in neck pain were used for assessments. Results: There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of emotional reaction, which is one of the sub-parameters of functional status and health-related quality of life (p <0.05). Conclusion and Suggestions: Conventional treatment applied by adding traction treatment has a positive therapeutic effect on functional status and emotional reaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• pain
• cervical pain
• traction

Servikal Mekanik İntermitant Traksiyonun Servikal Disk Hernili Hastalarda Klinik ve Fonksiyonel Durum Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Giriş: Servikal disk hernisi yaygındır ve toplum için maliyetlidir. Fiziksel modaliteler genellikle boyun rehabilitasyon programlarına dahil edilir. Müdahaleler termal, elektroterapi, ultrason, mekanik traksiyon, lazer ve akupunkturu içerebilir. Servikal Disk Hernisi için mekanik aralıklı traksiyona ilişkin kesin bilgiler sınırlıdır. Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, servikal disk hernisi tedavisinde konvansiyonel tedaviye ek olarak uygulanan mekanik intermittant traksiyonun ağrı, yaşam kalitesi, engellilik ve fonksiyonel durum üzerine etkilerini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya toplam 60 hasta dahil edildi. Çalışma grupları; sıcak paket (HP), transkutanöz elektriksel sinir stimülasyonu (TENS), ultrason (US) ve egzersiz (Grup 1, n=17), HP, TENS, US, traksiyon ve egzersiz tedavisi (Grup 2, n=22) ve sadece ev programı verilen (Grup 3, n=21) olarak belirlendi. Tedavi öncesi ve sonrası hastaların ağrısı Visüel Analog Skalası (VAS), fonksiyonel durumu Northwick Park Boyun Ağrısı Anketi (NPBAA), sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesi Notthingham Sağlık Profili (NSP), engellilik durumu Boyun Ağrı ve Disabilite İndeksi (BADİ) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Fonksiyonel durum ve sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesi alt parametrelerinden duygusal reaksiyon açısından gruplar arası anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Sonuç ve Öneriler: Traksiyon tedavisi eklenerek uygulanan konvansiyonel tedavi fonksiyonel durum ve duygusal reaksiyonlar üzerinde tedavi edici yönde olumlu etkiye sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ağrı
• boyun ağrısı
• traksiyon

Kaynakça

1. 1. Kızıl, R. (2009). Servikal Disk Hernileri. Turkiye Klinikleri J PM&R -Special Topics. 2, 35-43.
2. 2. Ataman, F., Hepgüler, S. (2004). Boyun ağrıları. Tıbbi rehabilitasyon, Ed. Oğuz H, Dursun E, Dursun N. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri. 1081-1114.
3. 3. Taşkıran, Ö.Ö., Bölükbaşı, N. (2007). Servikal Omurganın Hastalıkları. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. Arasıl T, editör. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri. 631-652.
4. 4. Harte, A.A., Baxter, G.D., Gracey, J.H. (2003). The efficacy of traction for back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.84:1542-53. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00294-6.
5. 5. Van Tulder, M.W., Koes, B., Malmivaara, A. (2006). Outcome of noninvasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J. 15, 64-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1048-6.
6. 6. Beurskens, A.J., de Vet, H.C., Kôke, A.J,……… Knipschild, P.G.(1997). Efficacy of traction for nonspecific low back pain. 12-week and 6-month results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 22:2756-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712010-00011.
7. 7. Van Tulder, M.W., Goosens, M., Hoving, J.(2000). Nonsurgical treatment of chronic nock pain. In: Nachemson A, Johnsson E, eds. Neck and Back Pain; The Scientific Evidence of Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.339-354.
8. 8. Macario, A., Pergolizzi, J.V. (2006). Systematic literature review of spinal decompression via motorized traction for chronic dis- cogenic low back pain. Pain Pract. 6, 171-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00082.x.

9. 9. Hoy, D.G., Protani, M., De, R., Bunchbinder, R (2010). The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 24(6):783-792. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.019.
10. 10. Brault, J.S., Kappler, R.E., Grogg, B.E. (2007). In: Braddom RL (Ed.). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. saunders, Philadelphia. 437-57.
11. 11. Wieting, J.M., Andary, M.T., Holmes, T.G., Rechtien, J.J., Zimmerman, G. (2005). Manipulation, Massage, and Traction. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM, Walsh (Ed.). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 285-309.
12. 12. Cameron, M. (1999). Traction and Compression. In: Cameron M (Ed.). Physical Agents in Rehabilitation: From Research to Practice. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, USA. 217-71.
13. 13. Leak, A.M., Cooper. J., Dyer, S., Williams, K.A., Turner-Stokes, L., Frank, A.O. (1994). The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 33, 469-474. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.5.469
14. 14. Kose, G., Hepguler, S., Atamaz, F., Oder, G. A. (2007). Comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 39, 358- 362. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0060.
15. 15. Wheeler, A.H., Goolkasian, P., Baird, A.C., Darden, B.V. (1999). Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale; Item analysis, face and criterion-related validity. Spine. 24, 1290-1294. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00004.
16. 16. Bicer, A., Yazici, A., Camdeviren, H., Erdoğan, C. (2004). Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 26, 959-962. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001696755.
17. 17. European Group for Quality of Life Assessment and Health Measurement: European Guide to the Nottingham Health Profile (1993). Brookwood-Surrey, Brookwood Medical Publications.
18. 18. Küçükdevecı, A.A., McKenna, S., Kutlay, S., Gürsel, Y., Whalley, D., Arasıl, T. (2000). The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res.23, 31-38. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004.
19. 19. Moffett, J.A.K., Lackson, D.A., Richmond, S.,………Torgerson, D.J. (2005). Randomised trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: outcomes and patients’ preference. BMJ. 330:75-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38286.493206.82
20. 20. Ylinen, J. (2007). Physical exercises and functional rehabilitation for the management of chronic neck pain. Eura Medicophys. 43,119-132. https://europepmc.org/article/med/17369784
21. 21. Borman, P., Keskin, D., Ekici, B., Bodur, H. (2008). The efficiency of intermittent cervical traction for cervical radiculopathy. Phys Ther. 89(7), 633-642. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0895-z.
22. 22. Jette, D.U., Falkel, J.E., Trombly, C. (1985). Effect of intermittant, supine cervical traction on the myoelectric activity of the upper m. Trapezius muscle in subjects with neck pain. Phys Ther. 65(8), 1173-1176. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.8.1173.
23. 23. Yıldız, M., Tuna, H., Kokino, S. (2005). Türk kronik boyun ağrılı olgularda spinal mobilite, ağrı ve özürlülük ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 51,127-130.
24. 24. Young, I.A., Michener, L.A., Cleland, J.A., Aguilera, A.J., Snyder, A.R. (2009). Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 89:632-642.
25. 25. Yang, J.D., Tam, K.W., Huang, T.W., Huang, S.W., Liou, T.H., Chen, H.C. (2017). Intermittent Cervical Traction for Treating Neck Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Spine. 42(13): 959-965. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001948.
26. 26. Cleland, J.A., Whitman, J.M., Fritz, J.M., Palmer, J.A. (2005). Manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in patients with cervical radiculopathy: A case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 35:802-811. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.12.802.
27. 27. Hattori, M., Shirai, Y., Aoki, T. (2002). Research on the effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction therapy, using short-latency somatosensory evokedpotentials. J Orthop Sci. 7,208–16. doi: 10.1007/s007760200035.
28. 28. Algun C (2003). Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon. (Birinci Baskı). İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri. 281-284.
29. 29. Dusunceli, Y., Ozturk, C., Atamaz, F., Hepguler, S., Durmaz, B. (2009). Effıcacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(8), 626-631. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0392.
30. 30. Sarig-Bahat, H. (2003). Evidence for exercise therapy in Mechanical Neck Disorders. Man Ther. 8(1), 10-20. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0480.