In-Class Activities and Evaluation Methods of Primary School Teachers to Develop 4th Grade Students' Creative Writing Skills

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 53 - 83, 30.06.2024

Fatma Buse Acar , Ergun Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.53629/sakaefd.1451220

Öz

The purpose of this research is to determine primary school teachers' classroom activities and evaluation methods to improve the creative writing skills of 4th grade students. A case study, one of the qualitative research designs, was used for the research. The study group of the research consists of a total of 25 classroom teachers, 14 female and 11 male, working in public schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education in the 2022-2023 academic year. Data were collected using the semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher. The data obtained from the semi-structured interview form was examined using the content analysis method. According to the research results, Teachers stated that they mostly used demonstration and brainstorming methods to develop their students' creative writing skills, and that they mostly did various writing activities in the classroom, such as poetry, composition, writing letters, completing the end of a movie or text, and writing using proverbs and idioms. It has been concluded that teachers mostly use portfolios, checklists and rubrics when evaluating their students' writings, and that they pay most attention to the use of spelling rules and punctuation marks, the integrity of meaning in the writing and the formal features of the writing when evaluating their students' writings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Writing, Creativity, Creative writing

İlkokul Öğretmenlerinin 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Yaratıcı Yazma Becerilerini Geliştirmeye Dönük Sınıf İçi Faaliyetleri ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilkokul öğretmenlerinin 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin yaratıcı yazma becerilerini geliştirmeye dönük sınıf içi faaliyetleri ve değerlendirme yöntemlerini belirlemektir. Araştırma için nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, 2022-2023 eğitim öğretim yılında Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı resmi okullarda görev yapmakta olan, 14 kadın 11 erkek toplamda 25 sınıf öğretmeninden oluşmaktadır. Veriler araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formundan elde edilen veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; öğretmenler öğrencilerinin yaratıcı yazma becerilerini geliştirmede en çok gösteri ve beyin fırtınası yöntemlerini kullandıklarını, sınıf içerisinde ise en fazla şiir, kompozisyon, mektup yazma, bir filmin ya da metnin sonunu tamamlatma, atasözü ve deyimleri kullanarak yazma gibi çeşitli yazma çalışmaları yaptıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Öğretmenlerin öğrencilerinin yazılarını değerlendirirken en çok portfolyo, kontrol listesi ve dereceli puanlama anahtarını kullandıkları, öğrencilerinin yazılarını değerlendirme sırasında en fazla imla kuralları ve noktalama işaretlerinin kullanımına, yazıdaki anlam bütünlüğüne ve yazının biçimsel özelliklerine dikkat ettikleri sonucu elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yazma, Yaratıcılık, Yaratıcı yazma

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Etik Kurulundan 31.08.2022 tarihli ve 341 sayılı onay alınmıştır. Katılımcılar gönüllülük esasına uygun şekilde belirlenmiştir.

Teşekkür

Kod ve temaların güvenirliklerinin hesaplanmasında yapmış olduğu yardımlardan dolayı Erciyes Üniversitesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Asena AYVAZ CAN’a teşekkürlerimi sunarım.

Kaynakça

• Abdalla Elhussien Mohammed, F. (2019). Creative writing from theory to practice: Multi-tasks for developing majmaah university students' creative writing competence. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.16
• Akyol, H. (2014) Programa uygun Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Alismail, H. A. ve McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150-154.
• Anae, N. (2014). “Creative writing as freedom, education as exploration”: Creative writing as literary and visual arts pedagogy in the first year teacher-education experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.8
• Applebee, A. N. ve Langer, J. A. (2011). EJ extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201116413
• Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J. ve Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003015
• Arshavskaya, E. (2015). Creative writing assignments in a second language course: A way to engage less motivated students. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.46504/10201506ar
• Aşıkcan, M. ve Pilten, G. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yazılı anlatım çalışmalarının süreç temelli yazma modeli odaklı değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Turkish Studies, 11(3), 255-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9515
• Ateş, S. ve Akyol, H. (2013). Türkçe dersi öğrenme- öğretme sürecinin anlama öğretimi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(3), 268-300.
• Aydın, E. ve Kaya, M. (2021). Yazma yöntem ve teknikleri. M.N. Kardaş, (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (1. Baskı, s. 183-215) içinde. Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676335
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M. ve Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029
• Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G. ve Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: Integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.006
• Barbot, B., Besançon, M. ve Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.005
• Barnet, S., Borto, E. W. ve Cain, E. W. (1997). An introduction to literature (11. Baskı). New York: Longman.
• Barton, G., Khosronejad, M., Ryan, M., Kervin, L. ve Myhill, D. (2023). Teaching creative writing in primary schools: A systematic review of the literature through the lens of reflexivity. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00641-9
• Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D. ve Garufis, J. (2005). Writing across the curriculum. Reference guides to rhetoric and composition. C. Bazerman, (Ed.). West Lafayette, EEUY: Parlor Press/WAC Clearinghouse.
• Bazerman, C. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text. Routledge.
• Bekurs, D. ve Santoli, S. (2004). Writing is power: Critical thinking, creative writing, and portfolio assessment. Essays in Education, 10(1), 1-6.
• Bernardes, E. ve Menzies, L. (2017). Creative writing in schools: Literature review. Retrieved from https://cfey.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CWIS-LiteratureReview-FINAL.pdf
• Bilgin, S. ve Şahbaz, N. K. (2021). Türkçe öğretmenlerinin yazma yöntem ve tekniklerini uygulama durumları. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(47), 252-270.
• Blythe, H. ve Sweet, C. (2005). Creative writing and an overlooked population. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 2(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790720508668950
• Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Graham, S. ve Hebert, M. (2016). Third and fourth grade teachers’ classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x
• Brookes, I. ve Marshall, D. (2004). Good writing guide. Hodder & Stoughton.
• Bruning, R. ve Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F., (2021) Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (30. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Cremin, T., Goouch, K., Blakemore, L., Goff, E. ve Macdonald, R. (2006). Connecting drama and writing: Seizing the moment to write. Research in Drama Education, 11(3), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780600900636
• Creswell, J.W. ve Guetterman, T.C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. Pearson, New York.
• Connolly, S. ve Burn, A. (2019). The story engine: Offering an online platform for making‘unofficial’ creative writing work. Literacy, 53(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12138
• Corkett, J., Hatt, B. ve Benevides, T. (2011). Student and teacher self-efficacy and the connection to reading and writing. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 34(1), 65-98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.34.1.65
• Çelik, O. T., Açar D., Tunç, Y. ve Candemir, B. (2022). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin çocuklarda yaratıcılığa ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 1182-1203. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1146398
• Çevik, A., (2021) Yazma tasarımı ve yazmada farkındalık (1. Baskı). Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676250
• Dean, D. (2005). Strategic writing: Moving beyond the classroom assignment. English Journal, 95(2), 82-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046550
• Demir, T. (2012). Türkçe eğitiminde yaratıcı yazma becerisini geliştirme ve küçürek öykü/Development of creatıve wrıtıng skılls in Turkısh educatıon and short story. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(19), 343-357.
• De Smedt, F. ve Van Keer, H. (2014). A research synthesis on effective writing instruction in primary education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1219
• De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H. ve Merchie, E. (2016). Student, teacher, and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children’s writing performance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 833–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z.
• Dilidüzgün, Ş. (2019). Yazma becerisinin önemi. N. Bayat (Ed.), Yazma ve eğitimi, (1. Baskı, s.187-222) içinde. Anı Yayıncılık.
• Donnelly, D. (2015). Creative writing as knowledge: What’s assessment got to do with it?. New Writing, 12(2), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2015.1042390
• Durga, V. S. S. ve Rao, C. S. (2018). Developing students' writing skills in English-A process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-5.
• Everett, N. (2005). Creative writing and English. The Cambridge Quarterly, 34(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfi026
• Fearn, L. ve Farnan, N. (2007). The influence of professional development on young writers' writing performance. Action in Teacher Education, 29(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2007.10463445
• Fischer, S. R. ve Fischer, S. R. (2003). History of writing. Reaktion books.
• Fleming, M. , Merrell, C. ve Tymms, P. (2004) . The impact of drama on pupils’ language, mathematics and attitude in two primary schools . Research in Drama Education, 9(2), 177 – 197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356978042000255067
• Frawley, E. (2014). No time for the'Airy fairy': Teacher perspectives on creative writing in high stakes environments. English in Australia, 49(1), 17-26.
• Freedman, S. W., Hull, G. A., Higgs, J. M., & Booten, K. P. (2016). Teaching writing in a digital and global age: Toward access, learning, and development for all. Handbook of research on teaching, 5, 1389-1450.
• Fryer, N. (2010). From reproduction to creativity and the aesthetic: Towards an ontological approach to the assessment of devised performance. Research in Drama Education, 15(4), 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2010.512189
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M. ve Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The internet and higher education, 9(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
• Gilbert J., Graham S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in Grades 4 to 6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
• Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. ve Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers’ use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(6), 1043–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9494-8
• Graham, S. (2006b). Writing. In P. Alexander ve Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2. Baskı, s. 457-478) içinde. Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum
• Graham, S. ve Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard educational review, 81(4), 710-744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
• Graham, S., Gillespie, A. ve McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and writing, 26(1) 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
• Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M. ve Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6) 1015-1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
• Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
• Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. ve MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
• Grainger, T., Goouch, K. ve Lambirth, A. (2005). Creativity and writing: Developing voice and verve in the classroom. Routledge.
• Griffin, P. ve Anh, P. N. (2005). Assessment of creative writing in vietnamese primary education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024969
• Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing (HOW) (2. Baskı). Harlow: Longman, Pearson Education
• Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching with DVD (Longman handbooks for language teachers) (4. Baskı). Harlow, England: Pearson Longman ELT
• Harper, G. ve Kroll, J. (2007). Creative writing studies: Practice, research and pedagogy. Multilingual Matters.
• Harper, G. (Ed.). (2015). Creative writing and education. Multilingual Matters.
• Harris, K. R. ve Graham, S. (2016). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Policy implications of an evidence-based practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624216
• Henry, J. (1999). Fresh takes on using journals to teach beginning writers (1. Baskı). New York: Scholastic Professional.
• Hertzberg F., Roe A. (2016). Writing in the content areas: A Norwegian case study. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(3), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9607-7
• Hodges, T. (2017). Theoretically speaking: An examination of four theories and how they support writing in the classroom. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(4), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1326228
• Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H. ve Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x
• Hsiang T., Graham S., Wong P. (2018). Teaching writing in Grades 7–9 in urban schools in the Greater China Region. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 473–507.
• Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600866015
• Kardaş, M. N., Esendemir, N. ve Kardaş, S. (2021). Yazma eğitimiyle ilgili temel bilgiler. M.N. Kardaş, (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (1. Baskı, s. 1-21) içinde. Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676335
• Kardaş, M. N., Esendemir, N. ve Kardaş, N. (2021). Türkçe dersi öğetim programlarında yazma eğitimi. M.N. Kardaş, (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (1. Baskı, s. 25-55) içinde. Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676335
• Kardaş, M. N., Tunagür, M. (2021). Yazmanın fiziksel ve zihinsel süreçleri. M.N. Kardaş, (Ed.), Yazma eğitimi (1. Baskı, s. 59-79) içinde. Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257676335
• Karwowski, M. ve Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001
• Kaya-Özgül, B. ve Ateş, S. (2023). An analysis of the relationship between primary school fourth-grade students’ writing performance, and student and class variables. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1195617
• Khan, H. I. (2012). English teachers’ perceptions about creativity and teaching creative writing in Pakistan. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 57-67.
• Klein, P. D. ve Boscolo, P. (2016). Trends in research on writing as a learning activity. Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), 311-350. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.01
• Larkin, S. (2009). Socially mediated metacognition and learning to write. Thinking skills and Creativity, 4(3), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.003
• Lubart, T., Barbot, B. ve Besançon, M. (2019). Creative potential: assessment issues and the EPoC Battery/Potencial creativo: temas de evaluación y batería EPoC. Estudios de Psicologia, 40(3), 540–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1656462
• McCarthy S. ve Ro Y. (2011). Approaches to writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6(4), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2011.604902
• Maltepe, S. (2006). Türkçe öğretiminde yazılı anlatım uygulamaları için bir seçenek: Yaratıcı yazma yaklaşımı. Dil Dergisi, (132), 56-66.
• Martin, A. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 239-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003
• Martin, A., Tarnanen, M. ve Tynjälä, P. (2018). Exploring teachers’ stories of writing: A narrative perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1462790
• Miles, M., Huberman, A. M. ve Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3. Baskı). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
• Morris, G. ve Sharplin, E. (2013). The assessment of creative writing in senior secondary English: A colloquy concerning criteria. English in Education, 47(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/17548845.2013.11912479
• Mozaffari, H. (2013). An Analytical Rubric for Assessing Creativity in Creative Writing. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2214-2219.
• Nettle, D. (2009). The evolution of creative writing. The psychology of creative writing, 101-116.
• Oral, G. (2003). Yine yazı yazıyoruz (6. Baskı). Pegem Yayıncılık. http://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802694
• Orhon, G. (2014). Yaratıcılık nörofizyolojik, felsefi ve eğitsel temeller (2. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Özbay, M. (2007) Türkçe Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri II (2.baskı). Öncü Yayınevi.
• Öztürk, E. (2007). Yaratıcı yazı yazmanın gelişim süreci ve ilköğretimde yaratıcı yazı yazma öğretimi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (14), 266-273.
• Parr, J. M. ve Jesson, R. (2016). Mapping the landscape of writing instruction in New Zealand primary school classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 981–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9589-5
• Rasool, H. A. F. ve Al Bajalani, F. R. H. (2020). Assessment rubric for creative writing: the case of undergraduate students at English language department in kri researchers. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(13), 2404-2408.
• Rezaei, A. R. ve Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing writing, 15(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
• Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H. ve Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 640-663. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000237
• Roberts, C. A. (2002). The influence of teachers' professional development at the Tampa Bay Area Writing Project on student writing performance. University of South Florida.
• Rodríguez, A. (2008). The ‘problem’of creative writing: using grading rubrics based on narrative theory as solution. New Writing, 5(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790720802209963
• San, İ. (1985). Sanat ve yaratıcılık eğitimi olarak tiyatro. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 18(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001094
• Sarıkaya, B. (2020). Yazma kazanımlarının yaratıcı yazmaya uygunluğu (2015 ve 2018 Türkçe dersi öğretim programları örnekleri). Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 5(1), 42-55.
• Spandel, V. (2001). Creating writers through 6 trait writing assessment and instruction. United States :Addison Wesley Longman.
• Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Çelik, P. ve Lubart, T. (2014). Learning to judge creativity: The underlying mechanisms in creativity training for non-expert judges. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.002
• Troia, G. A., Lin, S. J. C., Cohen, S. ve Monroe, B. W. (2011). A year in the writing workshop: Linking writing instruction practices and teachers’ epistemologies and beliefs about writing instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1086/660688
• Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and policy in schools, 3(3), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760490503706
• Tse S., Hui S. (2016). Chinese writing curriculum reforms in Hong Kong in recent years and their impact on teaching and learning. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9595-7
• Uyğun, A. ve Çetin, D. (2020). 2018 Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programındaki Yazma Kazanımlarının Yaratıcı Yazma Becerisine Uygunluğu. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(1), 14-23.
• Vaezi, M. ve Rezaei, S. (2019). Development of a rubric for evaluating creative writing: a multi-phase research. New Writing, 16(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.1520894
• Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D. ve Jones, A. (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: Peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.001
• Veiga Simão, A. M., Malpique, A. A., Frison, L. M. B. ve Marques, A. (2016). Teaching writing to middle school students in Portugal and Brazil: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9606-8
• Wang, L. (2019). Rethinking the significance of creative writing: A neglected art form behind the language learning curriculum. Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research, 6, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46573
• Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.
• Weldon, F. (2009). On assessing creative writing. New Writing, 6(3), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790720903556734
• Yamaç, A. ve Öztürk, E. (2018). Türkiye’deki ilkokul öğretmenlerinin yazma öğretimi uygulamaları ve algılarının değerlendirilmesi: Bir karma yöntem araştırması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 846-867. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018037559
• Yang, X. (2022). Research on digital teaching of creative writing in the context of computer big data. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2699833