SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA İÇİN KÜRESEL AMAÇLAR SONRASI SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR İÇ MİMARİ VE TASARIM ARAŞTIRMALARI: BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Öz

İklim değişikliği ve yoksulluk gibi temel sorunlarla savaşmak amacıyla Birleşmiş Milletler öncülüğünde Türkiye dahil 170 ülkenin imzaladığı Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Küresel Amaçlar 2030 yılına kadar başarılması gereken 17 temel amaçtan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışma, söz konusu amaçların yürürlüğe girdiği tarihi (2015) referans alıp 2023 yılı sonuna kadar üretilmiş sürdürülebilir iç mimari tasarım alanındaki çalışmaları değerlendirerek mevcut bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında kullanılan bibliyometrik analiz; yayınların betimsel, kavramsal ve atıf analizi üzerinden nicel olarak değerlendirilmesini sağlamaktadır. Çalışmada kullanılan yayınlar bilim dünyasınce kabul gören Web of Science veritabanından elde edilen araştırma ve derleme makalelerinden oluşmaktadır. Anahtar kelimeler girilerek elde edilen toplamda 8.354 yayın PRISMA protokolü kapsamında dahil edilme ve çıkarılma kriterleri ile 2.026 makaleye indirgenmiş ve analizler yapılmıştır. Çevreye duyarlı iç mekan tasarımı ve mimarisi konusunda birincil kaynak sayılan on altı süreli yayın bulunmaktadır. Alanda çalışılan temel konuların model geliştirme ve yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesine yönelik çalışmalar olduğu, yükselişte olan konuların ise mekanik özellikler ve dayanıklılık temelli olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın özgün değeri ele aldığı konu ve kapsamı ile ilgilidir. Sürdürülebilir iç mimarlık ile ilişkili yapılan bibliyometrik analiz çalışmalarına alanyazında az rastlanılmaktadır. Çalışmanın konusu olan Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Küresel Amaçların konuya olan etkilerini inceleyen çalışma ise bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilir tasarım
• İç mekan tasarımı
• İç mimarlık
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• Küresel Amaçlar

SUSTAINABLE INTERIOR DESIGN/ARCHITECTURE RESEARCHES AFTER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

The Global Goals for Sustainable Development, signed by 170 nations, including Turkey, under UN leadership to address climate change and poverty, have 17 goals to be met by 2030. This study aims to evaluate the studies in the field of sustainable interior architecture/ design produced until the end of 2023, taking as reference the date (2015) when these goals came into force. Bibliometric analysis used within the scope of the research. It provides quantitative evaluation of publications through descriptive, conceptual and citation analysis. Research and review articles from the scientifically approved Web of Science were used in the study. After entering keywords, 8,354 publications were limited to 2,026 articles with PRISMA protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. There are sixteen periodicals that are considered primary sources on environmentally friendly interior design/ architecture. The field’s core subjects are model development and life cycle evaluation, while mechanical properties and durability are emerging. The original value of the study is related to the subject it deals with and its scope. Bibliometric studies related to sustainable interior/architecture are rare in the literature. There is no study examining the effects of the Global Goals for Sustainable Development, which is the subject of the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainable design
• Interior design
• Interior architecture
• Bibliometric analysis
• The Global Goals

Kaynakça

1. Abafe, E. A., Bahta, Y. T. and Jordaan, H. (2022). Exploring Biblioshiny for Historical Assessment of Global Research on Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture. Sustainability, 14(17), 10651. DOI: 10.3390/su141710651
2. Ali, I. and Gölgeci, I. (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 49(8), 793–815. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM- 02-2019-0038
3. Andres, A. (2009). Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Elsevier.
4. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI: 10.1016/j. joi.2017.08.007
5. Ashour, M., Mahdiyar, A. and Haron, S. (2021), A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design, Sustainability, 13(18), 10403, DOI:10.3390/su131810403.
6. Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.
7. Burkut, E. B. (2023). Evaluation of Interior Architecture Education Research in the Web of Science Database: Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(1), 387–407. https://doi. org/10.30785/mbud.1263207
8. Carta, S., Pintacuda, L., Owen, I. and Turchi, T. (2021). Resilient Communities: A Novel Workflow. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil. 2021.767779

9. Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
10. Desha, C., Caldera, S., and Hutchinson, D. (2021). Exploring the development of context appreciation in coursework that targets problem-solving for sustainable development. Internatıonal Journal of Sustaınability in Higher Education, 22(5), 1186–1224. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0024
11. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., and Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
12. Dixit, S., Stefanska, A., and Musiuk, A. (2021). Architectural form finding in arboreal supporting structure optimisation. AIN Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 2321–2329. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.022
13. Dushenko, M., Bjorbaek, C., and Steger-Jensen, K. (2019). Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port. Sustainability, 11(1). DOI: 10.3390/su11010087
14. Eck, N. van, and Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-009-0146-3
15. Elshafei, G., Vilcekova, S., Zelenakova, M. and Negm, A. (2021). Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings. Sustainability, 13(17). DOI: 10.3390/su13179570
16. Garfield, E. and Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090140304
17. Ghamari, H., Golshany, N., Naghibi Rad, P. and Behzadi, F. (2021). Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi. org/10.3390/ejihpe11040099
18. Gmür, M. (2006). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27–57. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023619503005
19. Gong, J. and You, F. (2015). Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 10, 77–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche. 2015.09.001
20. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
21. Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., and Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89–114. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
22. Ismael, D., and Shealy, T. (2019). Industry Perceptions of Sustainable Design and Construction Practices in Kuwait. Journal of Green Building, 14(4), 169–193. DOI: 10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.169
23. Khahro, S., Kumar, D., Siddiqui, F., Ali, T., Raza, M. and Khoso, A. (2021). Optimizing Energy Use, Cost and Carbon Emission through Building Information Modelling and a Sustainability Approach: A Case-Study of a Hospital Building. Sustainability, 13(7). DOI: 10.3390/su13073675
24. Kreuzman, H. (2001). A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science. Scientometrics, 51(3), 525–539. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019647103469
25. Lopez, N., Martin, J., Biedermann, A., Saenz, J., and Fernandez-Vazquez, A. (2021). Projecting More Sustainable Product and Service Designs. Sustainability, 13(21). 11872. DOI: 10.3390/su132111872
26. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
27. Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006). EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15), 1396–1408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022
28. Milovanovic, J., Shealy, T. and Katz, A. (2021). Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers. Sustainability, 13(22). DOI: 10.3390/su132212570
29. Morell, M., Espelt, R. and Cano, M. (2020). Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(18). DOI: 10.3390/su12187640
30. Park, E. J. and Lee, S. (2022). Creative Thinking in the Architecture Design Studio: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Buildings, 12(6), Article 6. https:// doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828
31. Pouris, A., and Pouris, A. (2010). Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World. Scientometrics, 86(2), 541–552. DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-010-0277-6
32. Ramani, K., Skerlos, S., and Slocum, A. (2010). Sustainable Design (Guest Editorial). Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 2.
33. Rowlands, I. (2005). Emerald authorship data, Lotka’s law and research productivity. Aslib Proceedings, 57(1), 5–10. DOI: 10.1108/00012530510579039
34. Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2023). Bibliometric Overview and Visualization Analysis for Interior Design Research based on CiteSpace. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 14(1), 1–12.
35. Sanchez-Carracedo, F., Lopez, D., Martin, C., Vidal, E., Cabre, J., and Climent, J. (2020). The Sustainability Matrix: A Tool for Integrating and Assessing Sustainability in the Bachelor and Master Theses of Engineering Degrees. Sustainability, 12(14). DOI: 10.3390/su12145755
36. Snaith, B. A. (2013). An evaluation of author productivity in international radiography journals 2004–2011. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 60(3), 93–99. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.21
37. Suppipat, S., Teachavorasinskun, K., and Hu, A. (2021). Challenges of Applying Simplified LCA Tools in Sustainable Design Pedagogy. Sustainability, 13(4). DOI: 10.3390/su13042406
38. Thakker, V. and Bakshi, B. (2021). Toward sustainable circular economies: A computational framework for assessment and design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126353
39. Thakur, V., and Mangla, S. (2019). Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 847–862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.201
40. UNSTT. (2012). Realizing the Future We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General Koninklijke Brill NV. DOI: 10.1163/2210-7975_HRD-9823-0056
41. van der Velden, M. (2018). Digitalisation and the UN Sustainable development Goals: What role for design. Interaction Design and Architectures, 37, 160–174.
42. Vite, C. and Morbiducci, R. (2021), “Optimizing the Sustainable Aspects of the Design Process through Building Information Modeling”, Sustainability, 13(6). DOI: 10.3390/su13063041.
43. Yaşar, D. (2022). Trends of Research on Interıors: A Bibliometric Analysis of The Interiors: Design, Architecture, Culture Journal. Y. Aksoy & E. Duyan (Eds.), InContemporary Issues in Architecture and Urban Planning Architechture andExploration (pp. 18–28). DAKAM Books.
44. Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G. and Huang, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of green building research 2000-2016. Architectural Science Review, 62(1), 74–88. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548