A PROPOSED CYCLE MODEL FOR SPATIAL SOLIDARITY AND ITS UNFILLABLE VOID

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 448 - 464, 28.06.2024

Abdullah Yasin Dündar Serap Durmuş Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506449

Öz

The categorization of buildings based on their form or function—in other words, architectural
typology—could be defined as a literal way to comprehend the spaces where humans
live as if in a cohesive progression. Despite the mainstream tendency to use canonical categories
that account for every architectural feature, one of the most significant aspects of
space antagonizes every fixed definition imposed upon it: the void of space that cannot be
permanently filled by humans or reduced by mottos or concepts. Suggesting that the abyss
of space, which can be seen more clearly in the broader period, necessitates temporal acts of
solidarity, this paper focuses on the evoltions of symbiotic relationships among societal objects
that play dramatically important roles in the appropriation and sustainability of built
environments. Employing logical argumentation as its primary methodology, it leverages
models and arguments from seemingly irrelevant disciplines such as literature, philosophy,
and architecture. The proposed spatial cycle model, developed to illustrate bifurcations,
obstructions, and several life cycles of a space, highlights the need for a temporal symbiotic
model.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cycle model, Spatial solidarity, Void, Temporal structures, Symbiosis

MEKANSAL DAYANIŞMA VE DOLDURULAMAYAN BOŞLUĞU ÜZERİNE DÖNGÜSEL BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ

Öz

Binaların biçim veya işlevlerine göre kategorize edilmesi, diğer bir deyişle mimarlık tipolojisi,
insanın içinde uyumlu bir ilerleme içerisindeymiş gibi yaşadığı mekânların bilgisini
anlama ve kavramının düz anlamlı bir yol olarak tanımlanabilir. Mimarinin her uzanımına
uyan kanonik kategorilere var etme gibi ana akım bir eğilim olsa bile, mekânın en
önemli yönlerinden biri ona dayatılan her sabit tanımın karşısında durmasıdır. Bu, insanlar
tarafından kalıcı olarak doldurulamayan, mottolar veya kavramlara indirgenemeyen
doldurulamaz bir boşluktur. Makale, daha geniş bir zaman çerçevesinde daha net görülebilen
boşluk uçurumunun, zamansal dayanışma eylemlerini gerektirdiğini öne sürmektedir.
Yapılı çevrenin tahsis edilmesinde ve sürdürülebilirliğinde çarpıcı öneme sahip bir rolü
olan toplumsal nesnelerin simbiyotik ilişkisi yoluyla gerçekleşen evrimlere odaklanmaktadır.
Kullanılan birincil yöntem, edebiyat, felsefe ve mimarlık gibi görünüşte ilgisiz disiplinlerden
gelen modelleri ve argümanların bir araya getirerek mekânsal bir öneri sunulmasını
sağlayan mantıksal argümantasyondur. Bir mekânın ağaç gibi dallanmalarını, engellerini
ve sahip olduğu farklı yaşam döngülerini göstermek için önerilen mekânsal döngü modeli,
zamansal bir simbiyotik modele olan ihtiyacı göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Döngü modeli, Mekânsal dayanışma, Boşluk, Geçici yapılar, Simbiyoz.

Kaynakça

• Abdul Rahim, A. and Abu Hassan, F. (2012). Study on Space Configuration and Its Effect on Privacy Provision in Traditional Malay and Iranian Courtyard House. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research. 42, 115–119.
• Alexander, C. (1965). A City is Not a Tree. Sustasis Foundation, USA.
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
• Alexander, C. (2002). In The Nature of Order: The Phenomenon of Life. The Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley, CA.
• Alexander, C. and Eisenman, P. (2004). Contrasting Concepts of Harmony in Architecture: The 1982 Debate Between Christopher Alexander and Peter Eisenman. Katarxis, (3). Retrieved from http://www.katarxis3.com/
• Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
• Curtis, B. (2002). Public education and the manufacture of solidarity. Histoire sociale/Social History, 35(70), 447–468.
• Daskalaki, M. and Kokkinidis, G. (2017). Organising solidarity initiatives: A socio- spatial conceptualisation of resistance. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1303-1325.
• Daskalaki, M. (2018). Alternative organising in times of crisis: Resistance assemblages and socio-spatial solidarity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(2), 155-170.
• Groat, L. N. and Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Wiley, USA.
• Harman, G. (2017). Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin Books, London, UK.
• Harman, G. (2022). Architecture and Objects. The University of Minnesota Press, USA.
• Kalb, J. (2014). Life in design: Christopher Alexander and the nature of order. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), p. 94.
• Kim, M. J., Park, S. Y. and Wang, X. (2015). A conceptual framework of immersive shared environments emphasising social interaction. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(3), p. 45.
• Lane, B. M. (2007). Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Routledge, Abingdon, p. 467.
• Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, UK.
• Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. Verso, UK.
• Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. Verso, UK.
• Özen Eyüce, E. (2016). Allure of the crystal: myths and metaphors in architectural morphogenesis. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(1), 132-142.
• Raviz, S. R. H., Eteghad, A. N., Guardiola, E. U. and Aira, A. A. (2015). Flexible housing: The role of spatial organisation in achieving functional efficiency. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(2), 65-76.
• Sanya, T. (2016). Participatory design: An intersubjective schema for decision making. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(1), 62-74.
• Stevens, Q. (2018). Temporary Uses of Urban Spaces: How Are They Understood As ‘Creative’?. Archnet-IJAR: international journal of architectural research, 12(3), 90-107.
• Wan, Q. and Blas, S. M. (2021). Architecture as device: Estrangement theory from literature to architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11, 1-12.
• Wind, E. (1963). Art and Anarchy. Northwestern University Press, UK quoted by Moretti, F. (2013).