Research Article

Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis

Volume: 22 Number: 5 October 1, 2018
TR EN

Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis

Abstract

Selection of launch vehicle for a geostationary satellite is an important decision for satellite operators. Depending on only to the cost of the launcher may result unexpected consequences. Lifetime of the satellite is determined by the orbit parameters of the launcher. Success probability of the launcher can be deduced statistically by previous launches or using the insurance rate of the market for the selected launcher.  Insurance rate will be used in this study, which is also added to the cost of the satellite project besides satellite and launcher costs. Design life time of communication satellites are currently 15 years, means that manufacturer warrant the operation of the satellite for 15 years via performance incentive or warranty payback mechanisms. But satellites continue to generate revenues during their maneuver lifetime, which is more than 15 years. Expected value analysis is a powerful tool to include probabilistic nature of satellite projects. Satellite and launch costs, insurance rate and lifetime parameters will be utilized in expected value analysis to be able to select the best launcher for a given satellite program.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] http://www.sabah.com.tr/ekonomi/2011/03/08/yeni_uydularin_faturasi_571_milyon_/ [2] http://www.spacex.com [3] https://www.rocketbuilder.com [4] http://spacenews.com/space-insurers-warn-that-current-low-rates-are-not-sustainable/ [5] M. Nefes, M. Zor, T. Tetik, S. Gulgonul, “Determination of the Evaluation Criteria Weights for a Commercial Communication Satellite Program by Using AHP Method” 1st International Symposium on Critical and Analytical Thinking, April 2015. [6] T. Tetik and G. S. Daş, "Launch vehicle selection for a geostationary communication satellite using data envelopment analysis," 8th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), Istanbul, 2017. [7] Jean-François Gauché, “Space Risks”, Centre d’Etude Actuarielle, December 2011. [8] L. Virine, “Practical project risk management in 60 minutes” PMI Global Congress, North America, Dallas, TX, 2011. [9] P. Ordyna, “Insuring Human Space Flight: An Underwriters Dilemma”, Journal of Space Law 36, 2010. [10] Sullivan, Brook Rowland, “Technical And Economic Feasibility Of Telerobotic On-Orbit Satellite Servicing”, Thesis (Ph.D.) University of Maryland, College Park, 2005. [11] Ted Perez, Daniel Pires, Gregory Singleton, “Methodology for the economic analysis of on-orbit servicing of satellites”, IEEE Systems and Information Design Symposium, University of Virginia, 2002. [12] Franklin J. Stermole and John M. Stermole, “Economic Evaluation and Investment Decision Methods”, 14th Edition, 2014. [13] S. Gulgonul, N. Sozbir, “Propellant budget calculation of geostationary satellites”, International Conference on Energy Systems Engineering, 2017. (Accepted Paper) [14] Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle PAYLOAD USER’S GUIDE, Rev 2, October 21, 2015. [15] ARIANE-5 USER’S MANUAL ISSUE 5 REVISION 2 OCTOBER 2016. [16] PROTON Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Revision 7, July 2009.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

October 1, 2018

Submission Date

October 25, 2017

Acceptance Date

May 3, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 22 Number: 5

APA
Gülgönül, Ş., & Sözbir, N. (2018). Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22(5), 1418-1422. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.346597
AMA
1.Gülgönül Ş, Sözbir N. Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. SAUJS. 2018;22(5):1418-1422. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.346597
Chicago
Gülgönül, Şenol, and Nedim Sözbir. 2018. “Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22 (5): 1418-22. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.346597.
EndNote
Gülgönül Ş, Sözbir N (October 1, 2018) Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22 5 1418–1422.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Gülgönül and N. Sözbir, “Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis”, SAUJS, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1418–1422, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.346597.
ISNAD
Gülgönül, Şenol - Sözbir, Nedim. “Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22/5 (October 1, 2018): 1418-1422. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.346597.
JAMA
1.Gülgönül Ş, Sözbir N. Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. SAUJS. 2018;22:1418–1422.
MLA
Gülgönül, Şenol, and Nedim Sözbir. “Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 22, no. 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 1418-22, doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.346597.
Vancouver
1.Şenol Gülgönül, Nedim Sözbir. Selection of Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle Using Expected Value Analysis. SAUJS. 2018 Oct. 1;22(5):1418-22. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.346597

Cited By


INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

33418 33537  30939     30940 30943 30941  30942  33255    33253  33254

30944  30945  30946   34239




30930Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Ticari Olmayan 4.0 Uluslararası Lisans   kapsamında lisanslanmıştır .