Research Article

Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance

Volume: 22 Number: 6 December 1, 2018
EN

Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance

Abstract

Biased estimation methods are more desirable than two stage least squares estimation for simultaneous equations models suffering from the problem of multicollinearity. This problem is also handled by using some prior information. Taking account of this knowledge, we recommend two stage modified ridge estimator. The new estimator can also be evaluated as an alternative to the previously proposed two stage ridge estimator. The widespread performance criterion, mean square error, is  taken into consideration to compare the two stage modified ridge, two stage ridge and two stage least squares estimators. A real life data analysis is investigated to prove the theoretical results in practice. In addition, the intervals of the biasing parameter which provide the superiority of the two stage modified ridge estimator are determined   with the help of figures. The researchers who deal with simultaneous systems with multicollinearity can opt for the two stage modified ridge estimator.

Keywords

References

  1. A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, “Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems”, Technometrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55-67, 1970.
  2. H. D. Vinod and A. Ullah, “Recent advances in regression methods”, Marcel Dekker, New York, Inc., 1981.
  3. B. F. Swindel, “Good Ridge Estimators Based on Prior Information”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, vol. A5, pp. 1065-1075, 1976.
  4. G. Trenkler, “Generalized mean squared error comparisons of biased regression estimators”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, vol. A9, no. 12, pp. 1247-1259, 1980.
  5. J. L. Pliskin, “A ridge type estimator and good prior means”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3429–3437, 198.
  6. A. E. Hoerl, R. W. Kennard and K. F. Baldwin, “Ridge regression: some simulations”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, vol. 4, pp. 105–123, 1975.
  7. B. M. G. Kibria, “Performance of some new ridge regression estimators”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, vol. 32, no. pp. 419–435, 2003.
  8. J. F. Lawless and P. A. Wang, “Simulation study of ridge and other regression estimators”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 307-323, 1976.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Mathematical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 1, 2018

Submission Date

January 11, 2018

Acceptance Date

March 26, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 22 Number: 6

APA
Toker, S., & Özbay, N. (2018). Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22(6), 1631-1637. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.377423
AMA
1.Toker S, Özbay N. Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance. SAUJS. 2018;22(6):1631-1637. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.377423
Chicago
Toker, Selma, and Nimet Özbay. 2018. “Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22 (6): 1631-37. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.377423.
EndNote
Toker S, Özbay N (December 1, 2018) Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22 6 1631–1637.
IEEE
[1]S. Toker and N. Özbay, “Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance”, SAUJS, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1631–1637, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.377423.
ISNAD
Toker, Selma - Özbay, Nimet. “Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 22/6 (December 1, 2018): 1631-1637. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.377423.
JAMA
1.Toker S, Özbay N. Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance. SAUJS. 2018;22:1631–1637.
MLA
Toker, Selma, and Nimet Özbay. “Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 22, no. 6, Dec. 2018, pp. 1631-7, doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.377423.
Vancouver
1.Selma Toker, Nimet Özbay. Evaluation of Two Stage Modified Ridge Estimator and Its Performance. SAUJS. 2018 Dec. 1;22(6):1631-7. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.377423

Cited By


INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

33418 33537  30939     30940 30943 30941  30942  33255    33253  33254

30944  30945  30946   34239




30930Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Ticari Olmayan 4.0 Uluslararası Lisans   kapsamında lisanslanmıştır .