UFRS’YE UYUMUN KÜRESEL REKABET GÜCÜ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2024, , 179 - 210, 23.08.2024

Ünal Eryılmaz , Deniz Koçak

https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1500046

Öz

Uluslararası Finansal Raporlama Standartlarına (UFRS) küresel uyum, muhasebe uygulamalarının harmonizasyonunu ve finansal tabloların karşılaştırılabilirliğini artıran önemli bir dönüşümü temsil etmektedir. Bu dönüşümün kapsamlı bir incelemesini sağlamak amacıyla çalışmada, ülkelerin UFRS’ye uyum seviyesi ile küresel rekabet edebilirlik göstergeleri arasındaki ilişki, çoklu varyans analizi (MANOVA) ve diskriminant analizi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. 86 ülkeden elde edilen veriler analiz edilerek, UFRS’ye
uyum seviyelerine göre çeşitli rekabet edebilirlik göstergelerinde önemli farklılıklar saptanmıştır. MANOVA sonuçları, tam veya kısmi UFRS uyumuna sahip ülkelerin genellikle daha yüksek kurumsal kalite, altyapı ve bilgi ve iletişim teknolojisi uyum oranlarına sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Diskriminant analizi, ülkeleri UFRS uyum seviyelerine göre %77.9 doğruluk oranıyla sınıflandırarak, bu uyum seviyelerinin belirlenmesinde ilgili göstergelerin kritik bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, UFRS uyumunun ekonomik performansı ve kurumsal kaliteyi artırabileceğini göstermekte ve politika yapıcılar için değerli bilgiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

UFRS, Küresel Rekabet Edebilirlik, MANOVA, Diskriminant Analizi, Kurumsal Kalite, Ekonomik Performans

THE IMPACT OF IFRS ADOPTION ON GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS

Öz

Global adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) represents a significant transformation that enhances the harmonization of accounting practices and the comparability of financial statements. In this study, the relationship between countries’ levels of IFRS adoption and global competitiveness indicators is investigated using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and discriminant analysis to comprehensively examine this transformation. Data from 86 countries are analyzed, revealing significant differences in several competitiveness indicators based on IFRS adoption levels. The MANOVA results indicate that countries with full or partial IFRS adoption generally exhibit higher institutional quality, infrastructure, and information and communication technology adoption rates. The discriminant analysis classifies countries based on their IFRS adoption levels with an accuracy rate of 77.9%, demonstrating that these adoption levels play a critical role in determining the relevant indicators. The findings suggest that adopting IFRS can enhance economic performance and institutional quality providing valuable insights for policymakers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

IFRS, Global Competitiveness, MANOVA, Discriminant Analysis, Institutional Quality, Economic Performance

Kaynakça

• Akisik, O., Gal, G. and Mangaliso, M.P. (2020). IFRS, FDI, economic growth and human development: The experience of Anglophone and Francophone African countries. Emerging Markets Review, 45, 100725.
• Armstrong, C.S., Barth, M.E., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Riedl, E. J. (2010). Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 31-61.
• Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36(sup1), 5-27.
• Cai, F. and Wong, H. (2010). The effect of IFRS adoption on global market integration. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(10), 25-34.
• Callao, S. and Jarne, J.I. (2010). Have IFRS affected earnings management in the European Union? Accounting in Europe, 7(2), 159-189.
• Christensen, H.B., Lee, E., Walker, M. and Zeng, C. (2015). Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption? European Accounting Review, 24(1), 31-61.
• Cieślik, A. and Hamza, S. (2022). Inward FDI, IFRS adoption and institutional quality: Insights from the MENA countries. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 47.
• Clements, C.E., Neill, J.D. and Stovall, O. S. (2010). Cultural diversity, country size, and the IFRS adoption decision. Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(2), 115-126.
• Çilan, Ç.A., Bolat, B.A. and Coşkun, E. (2009). Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries of European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 98-105.
• De George, E.T., Li, X. and Shivakumar, L. (2016). A review of the IFRS adoption literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 21, 898-1004.
• Dhaliwal, D., He, W., Li, Y. and Pereira, R. (2019). Accounting standards harmonization and financial integration. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2437-2466.
• Elbakry, A.E., Nwachukwu, J.C., Abdou, H.A. and Elshandidy, T. (2017). Comparative evidence on the value relevance of IFRS-based accounting information in Germany and the UK. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 28, 10-30.
• Emerson, R.W. (2018). MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance): An expanded form of the ANOVA (analysis of variance). Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 125-127.
• European Parliament and Council (2002). Regulation (EC) No 1606⁄2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 243:1, 1-4.
• Francis, J.R., Huang, S.X. and Khurana, I.K. (2016). The role of similar accounting standards in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1298-1330.
• Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P. and Zhu, W. (2012). The impact of IFRS adoption on foreign direct investment. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(4), 374-398.
• Gürler, C. (2023). Ease of doing business in European Union countries and candidates. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 57, 81-93.
• Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M.B.U. and Hasan, M. M. (2019). IFRS adoption, financial reporting quality and cost of capital: A life cycle perspective. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(3), 497-522.
• Horton, J., Serafeim, G. and Serafeim, I. (2013). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment? Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 388-423.
• Huberty, C.J. and Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication.
• IFRS Foundation (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. available at: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/issued/part-a/conceptual-framework-for-financial-reporting.pdf. Accessed: 6.5.2024
• IFRS Foundation (2024). Who uses IFRS Accounting Standards? https://www.ifrs.org/usearound-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/ Accessed: 25.4.2024
• Jamani, F., Alidarous, M. and Alharasis, E. (2022). The combined impact of IFRS mandatory adoption and institutional quality on the IPO companies’ underpricing. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
• Jeanjean, T. and Stolowy, H. (2008). Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 480-494.
• Jermakowicz, E.K. and Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2006). Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 170-196.
• Kohler, H., Pochet, C. and Gendron, Y. (2021). Networks of interpretation: An ethnography of the quest for IFRS consistency in a global accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 95, 101277.
• Leuz, C. and Verrecchia, R.E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91-124.
• Liviu-Alexandru, T. (2018). The Impact of IFRS Adoption in Emerging Economies. Annals-Economy Series, 6, 152-157.
• Mameche, Y. and Masood, A. (2021). Macroeconomic evidence on the impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on FDI in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 610-631.
• Mensah, E. (2019). The effect of IFRS adoption on financial reporting quality: evidence from listed manufacturing firms in Ghana. Economic Research, 34(1), 2890-2905.
• Nobes, C. (2006). The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3), 233-245.
• O’Connell, V. and Sullivan, K. (2008). The impact of mandatory conversion to IFRS on the net income of FTSEurofirst 80 firms. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, 3(2), 17-23.
• Oppong, C. and Aga, M. (2019). Economic growth in European Union: does IFRS mandatory adoption matter? International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5), 792-808.
• Owusu, G.M., Saat, N.A.M., Suppiah, S.D.K. and Siong, H.L. (2017). IFRS adoption, institutional quality and foreign direct investment inflows: A dynamic panel analysis. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 10(2), 43-75.
• Pituch, K.A. and Stevens J.P (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (Sixth edition). New York: Routledge.
• Pope, P.F. and McLeay, S.J. (2011). The European IFRS experiment: Objectives, research challenges and some early evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 41(3), 233-266.
• Shah, S.Z.A. and Wan, F. (2024). Financial integration and earnings management: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(2), 197-220.
• Sharma, S., Joshi, M. and Kansal, M. (2017). IFRS adoption challenges in developing economies: an Indian perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), 406-426.
• Shima, K.M. and Gordon, E.A. (2011). IFRS and the regulatory environment: The case of US investor allocation choice. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(5), 481-500.
• Shima, K.M. and Yang, D.C. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of IFRS. International Journal of Business, 17(3), 276.
• Tyrrall, D., Woodward, D. and Rakhimbekova, A. (2007). The relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards to a developing country: Evidence from Kazakhstan. The International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 82-110.
• Uyar, A. and Güngörmüş, A.H. (2013). Perceptions and knowledge of accounting professionals on IFRS for SMEs: Evidence from Turkey. Research in Accounting Regulation, 25(1), 77-87.
• Warne, R. (2014). A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19(1), 1-10.
• Whittington, G. (2005). The adoption of international accounting standards in the European Union. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 127-153.
• World Bank. World Development Indicators database. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, Accessed: 3.3.2024.
• World Economic Forum. The Global competitiveness index 4.0 2019 dataset (version 04 October 2019). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCI_4.0_2019_Dataset.xlsx Accessed: 3.3.2024.