YENİ KAMU İŞLETMECİLİĞİ KAPSAMINDA YENİ KURUMSAL İKTİSAT ANLAYIŞININ KAMU KURUMLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Bu makale ile, Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği (YKİ) anlayışı kapsamında Yeni Kurumsal İktisat anlayışının kamu kurumları üzerindeki etkileri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu etkiler Anglosakson ülkeler başta olmak üzere YKİ anlayışından kapsamlı bir şekilde etkilenen birçok ülkede gözlenmektedir. Bu kapsamda literatür incelemesi yapılarak bahsi geçen dönüştürücü etkilerin nitelikleri ve kapsamı belirlenerek ortaya çıkan kurumsal dönüşümün kendi içerisindeki gelişim aşamaları değerlendirilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan bulgular Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliğinin ilk döneminde kurumsal düzen üzerinde etkili olan Yeni Kurumsal İktisata dair ilke ve önermelerin reformun ilerleyen yıllarında kimi alanlarda azaldığını kimi alanlarda ise tamamen uygulamadan kaldırıldığını göstermektedir. Makro perspektiften değerlendirildiğinde bu durumun YKİ sonrası işletmecilik anlayışı ve geleneksel kurumsal yapının sentezine dayanan eşgüdüm odaklı geri çekiliş dönemini açıklayan önemli faktörlerden biri olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği
• Yeni Kurumsal İktisat
• Kamu Sektörü
• Yarı-Özerk Kurumlar

THE EFFECT OF THE NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS ON PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT

Abstract

This article aims to determine the effects of New Institutional Economics on public institutions within the scope of New Public Management (NPM). These effects are observed in many countries that are extensively affected by the concept of NPM, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries. In this context, by making a literature review, the characteristics and scope of the aforementioned transformative effects are determined and the development stages of the emerging institutional transformation are evaluated. The findings show that the principles and propositions of New Institutional Economics, which were effective on institutional design in the first period of New Public Management, are either decreased in some areas in the following years of the reform, or completely removed from practice. When evaluated from a macro perspective, it is seen that this situation is one of the important factors explaining the coordination-oriented withdrawal period of the Post-NPM.

Keywords

• New Public Management
• New Institutional Economics
• Public Sector
• Quasi-autonomous Public Bodies

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, Ş. (1995). Yeni Sağ ve Kamu Yönetimi. Kamu Yönetimi Sempozyum Bildirileri, 2.
2. Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Governance, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1990.tb00111.x
3. Barker, A. (1982). Quangos in Britain: Government and the Networks of Public Policy-Making. Springer.
4. Barzelay, M. (2000). The New Public Management: a Bibliographical Essay for Latin American (and other) Scholars. International Public Management Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00038-6
5. Boston, J. (2016). Basic NPM Ideas and their Development, The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management (ed. Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid) içerisinde. Routledge.
6. Coase, R.H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
7. Cudworth, E. (2007). The ‘New’ Right: The Minimal State. The Modern State: Theories and Ideologies (Eds. Cudworth, E., Hall, E., & McGovern, J.) içerisinde. Edinburgh University Press.
8. Çetin, T. (2012). Yeni Kurumsal İktisat. Journal of Sociological Studies/Sosyoloji Konferanslari, (45).

9. Dryzek, J. S., & Dunleavy, P. (2009). Theories of the Democratic State. Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Felts, A., Jos, P. H. (2000). Time and Space: The Origins and Implications of the New Public Management. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22:3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2000.11643469
11. Furubotn, E., & Richter, R. (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory: the Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. The University of Michigan Press.
12. Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management. International public management journal, 4(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
13. Hay, C. (2005). The state: theories and issues. Palgrave.
14. Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (1997). Riding the Crest of a Wave: The National Performance Review and Public Management Reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699708525187
15. Holcombe, R. G. (2016). Advanced Introduction to Public Choice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Hood, C. (1986). The Hidden Public Sector: The Quango-cratization of the World. Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector (Ed. Kaufman, F.) içerisinde. Walther De Gruyter.
17. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
18. Kama, Ö. (2011). Yeni Kurumsal İktisat Okulunun Temelleri. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2).
19. King, D. S. (1987). New Right: Politics, Markets and Citizenship. Macmillan International Higher Education.
20. Klein, P. G. (2000). New Institutional Economics. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, C.1, 456-489. Edward Elgar. Lane, J. E. (2000). The Public Sector: Concepts, Models AND Approaches. Sage.
21. Lynn, L. E. (2005). Public Management: a Concise History of the Field. The Oxford handbook of public management (Eds. Ferlie, E., Lynn, L., Pollitt, C.) içerisinde. 27-50. Oxford University Press.
22. Ménard, C., & Shirley, M. M. (2005). Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Vol. 9). Springer.
23. Moe, T. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28 (4), 739-777. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110997
24. Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Aldine-Atherton.
25. Niskanen, W. A. (1991). A Refelection on Bureaucracy and Representative Government. The Budget Maximizing Bureaucrat. (Eds. Blaise, A. & Dion, S.) içerisinde. 13–32. University of Pittsburgh Press.
26. Niskanen, W. A. (1994). Reassessment. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. (Ed. Niskanen, W., A.) içerisinde. 269–83. Edward Elgar.
27. North, D. C. (1984). Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic History. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft/Journal of institutional and theoretical economics, (H. 1), 7-17.
28. OECD. (2002). Distributed Public Governance: Agencies, Authorities and Other Government Bodies. OECD
29. Ömürgönülşen, U. (2003). Kamu Sektörünün Yönetimi Sorununa Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi I (Der. M. Acar ve H. Özgür) içerisinde, Nobel Yayınevi.
30. Perrow, C. (1986). Economic theories of organization. Theory and society, 15(1-2), 11-45.
31. Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: a Survey. Political studies review, 1(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1478-9299.00004
32. Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., & Talbot, C. (2001). Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 3(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980108412663
33. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity. 4.th Edition. Oxford University Press.
34. Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. Routledge.
35. Richter, R. (2015). Essays on new institutional economics. Springer.
36. Tarko, V. (2016). Elinor Ostrom: an Intellectual Biography. Rowman & Littlefield.
37. Thiel, S., James, O. (2016). Structural Devolution to Agencies. The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management (ed. Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid) içerisinde. Routledge.
38. Tullock, G. (2018). Public Choice. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Verhoes, K. (2018). Agencification in Europe. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration Anad Management in Europe (ed. Edoardo Ongaro & Sandra van Thiel) içerisinde. Palgrave Macmillan.
40. Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-Agent Models: an Expansion?. Journal of public administration research and theory, 8(2), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377
41. Winden, F.A.A.M. (1988). The Economic Theory of Political Decision-Making: A Survey and Perspective. Public Choice (Eds. Van Den Broeck, J.) içerisinde. Springer.