AKADEMİSYENLERİN AKIL HOCALIĞI EĞİLİMLERİ İLE LİDERLİK TARZLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN BELİRLENMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Bu çalışmada, akademisyenlerin akıl hocalığı eğilimi ile liderliktarzları arasındaki ilişkilerin irdelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Mehmet AkifErsoy Üniversitesi bünyesindeki fakülte, yüksekokullar ve meslekyüksekokulları ile Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesindeki fakültelerde görevyapan akademik personelden anket yöntemi ile elde edilen veriler faktöranalizi, korelasyon analizi, regresyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Eldeedilen bulgular sonucunda; akademisyenlerin akıl hocalığı eğilimleri ileliderlik tarzları arasında anlamlı ilişkilerin bulunduğu istatistiksel olarakkabul edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akıl hocalığı (mentoring), liderlik tarzları,akademik personel

A RESEARCH ON DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ACADEMICIANS PROPENSITY OF MENTORING AND LEADERSHIP STYLES

Abstract

This study aims to investigate relationships between academicianspropensity of mentoring and leadership styles. The data provided by surveymethod from a sample of academic staffs in Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universityand Suleyman Demirel University. These data are analyzed via factoranalysis, correlation analysis, regression analyses. According to the results, itis statistically supported that there are significant relationships amongacademic staffs propensity of mentoring and leadership styles

Keywords

• Mentoring, leadership styles, academic staffs

Kaynakça

1. FREDERICK C. and LAWRENCE G., International Accounting, I nternational Thomson Business Pres, London, 1997
2. GAAP CONVERGENCE, “A Survey of National Efforts to Promote and Achieve Convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards”, s.10, http://www.iasplus.com/resource/gaap2002.pdf, (25.05.2010)
3. GRAY S.J. and VINT H.M., “The Impact of Culture on Accounting Disclosure Some International Evidence”, Journal of Accounting, December 1995
4. GÜCENME, Ü., “Küreselleşmede Muhasebe Standartları”, Mufad, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Sayı 5, 2000
5. GÜVEMLİ, B.“Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartlarının Çeşitli Ülkelerin Muhasebe Kültürleri İle Etkileşimi ve Türkiye Örneği”, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, 2008
6. HALLER, A., “Accounting in Germany”,(Ed. P. Walton, ve Diğerleri), International Accounting, Thomson, London, 1998 LEWIS, M.,.K., “Islam and Accounting”, Accounting Forum, Vol:25, Issue:2, Jun 2001
7. OZANKAYA, Ö. Toplumbilimine Giriş, S Yayınları, Ankara, 1984
8. SELİMOĞLU, S.K. “Dünyadaki Uygulamalarından Hareketle Finansal Raporlama Standartlarının Finansal Tablolar Üzerindeki Etkileri”, http://dosya.izsmmmo.com/documan/TMSS_XII_BILDIRILER/sev al_selimoglu.doc (15.05.2010).

9. USUL, H.Davranışsal Muhasebe, Asil Yayınları,Ankara, 2007 ÜSTÜNDAĞ, ,S.“Muhasebe Standartları Oluşturma Süreci”, Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış Dergisi, Yıl:1, Sayı:1, Nisan 2000
10. VALLE, F.D.“Küreselleşme, Standartlarda Yakınsama, ve Muhasebe Mesleğine Rehberlik Eden İlkeler”, 12.Dünya Muhasebe Tarihçileri Konferansı Açılış Konuşması, s.19, http://uvt.ulakbim.gov. (10.05.2010)
11. VERMA ,S., Cultur and Politics in International Accounting: an Exploratory Frameworks, Universty of London. Unpublished Working Paper. ZARZESKI2008 M.T. “Spontaneous Harmonization Effects of Culture and Market Forces on Accounting Disclosure Practices” Accounting Horizons, 10
12. ÇELİK, C. ve SÜNBÜL, Ö. “Liderlik Algılamalarında Eğitim ve Cinsiyet Faktörü: Mersin İlinde Bir Alan Araştırması”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, C.13, S.3, 49-66, 2008.
13. DİLEK, H. “ Liderlik Tarzlarının ve Adalet Algısının; Örgütsel Bağlılık, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerine Etkilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze, 2005.
14. EMMERIK, H.V. “For Better and for Worse- Adverse working conditions and the Beneficial Effects Of Mentoring”, Career Development International, Vol: 9, No: 4, 358-373, 2004.
15. EREN, Erol, “Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi”, Beta Yayınları, Yayın No: 1433, 9.Baskı, İstanbul, 2006.
16. FERRIGNO, T.B. ve MUTH, R. “Leadership Mentoring and Situated Learning: Catalysts for Principalship Readiness and Lifelong Mentoring”, Mentoring & Tutoring, Vol. 14, No. 3, 275–295, 2006.
17. FEY, C.F., ADAEVA, M. ve VITKOVSKAIA, A. “Developing a Model of Leadership Styles: What Works Best in Russia?”, International Business Review, 10, 615–643, 2001.
18. FREY, M., KERN, R.M., SNOW, J. ve CURLETTE, W.L. “Lifestyle and Transformational Leadership Style” The Journal of Individual Psychology, Vol: 65, No: 3, 212- 240, 2009.
19. GIRI, V.N. ve SANTRA, T. “ Effects of Job Experience, Career Stage, and Hierarchy on Leadership Style” Singapore Management Review, Vol: 32, No:1, 85-93, 2010.
20. GODSHALK, V.M. ve SOSIK, J.J. “Does Mentor-Protégé Agreement on Mentor Leadership Behavior Influence the Quality of a Mentoring Relationship?”, Group & Organization Management, Vol: 25 No: 3, 291-317, 2000.
21. GUNTHER, M., EVANS, G., MEFFORD, L., ve COE, T.R. “ The Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Empathy Among Student Nurses”, Nursing Outlook, 55, 196-201, 2007.
22. HAMBLEY, L.A., Q’NEILL, T.A. ve KLINE, T.J.B. “Virtual Team Leadership: The Effects of Leadership Style and communication Medium on Team Interaction Styles and Outcomes” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1–20, 2007.
23. HANNAY, M. “ The Cross-Cultural Leader: The Application of Servant Leadership Theory in the International Context” Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 1-12, 2009.
24. HENRIQUES, P.L. ve CURADO, C. “Pushing the Boundaries on Mentoring: Can Mentoring Be a Knowledge Tool?”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1): 85–97, 2009.
25. HO, J.S.Y., YONG, D., CHING, P.W. ve BOON, K. “Closing the Leadership Gaps: Preferred and Perceived Leadership Style Among Life Insurance Agents”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences , 3(3): 2437-2446, 2009
26. HOLMES, J. “Leadership Talk: How Do leaders ‘Do mentoring’, and is Gender Relevant?”, Journal of Pragmatics, Vol: 37, 1779-1800, 2005
27. JOTKOWITZ, A.B. ve CLARFIELD, A.M. “Mentoring in Internal Medicine” European Journal of Internal Medicine, 17, 399-401, 2006.
28. KAHAI, S.S., SOSIK, J.J. ve AVOLIO, B.J. “Effects of Leadership Style, Anonymity, and Rewards on Creativity-Relevant Processes and Outcomes in an Electronic Meeting System Context”, The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 499–524, 2003.
29. KIM, S.S. “ Learning Goal Orientation, Formal Mentoring, and Leadership Competence in HRD”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol: 31, No: 3, 181-194, 2007.
30. KOÇEL, T. İşletme Yöneticiliği, Arıkan Basım, 10. Baskı, İstanbul, 2006. LATHER, A.S., JAIN, V.K., JAIN, S. ve VIKAS, S. “Leadership Styles in Relation to Conflict Resolution Modes : A Study of Delhi Jal Board (DJB)”, XIMB Journal Of Management, 19-38, 2009.
31. MATHEWS, P. “The Role Of Mentoring in Promoting Organisational Competitiveness”, CR,Vol: 16, No: 2, 158-169, 2006.
32. MCALEARNEY, A.S. “Exploring Mentoring and Leadership Development in Health Care Organizations”, Career Development International, Vol: 10, No: 6/7, 493-511, 2005.
33. MCCLOUGHEN, A., O’BRIEN, L. ve JACKSON, D. “Esteemed Connection: Creating a Mentoring Relationship for Nurse Leadership”, Nursing Inquiry, 16(4): 326–336, 2009.
34. MCCOLL-KENNEDY, J.R. ve ANDERSON, R.D. “Subordinate–Manager Gender Combination and Perceived Leadership Style Influence on Emotions, Self-esteem and Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Business Research, 58, 115– 125, 2005.
35. MIDDLEBROOKS, A.E. ve HABERKORN, J.T. “Implicit Leader Development”, Journal of Leadershıp Studies, Vol: 2, No: 4, 7-22, 2009.
36. MINETT, D., YAMAN, H.R. ve DENİZCİ, B. “Leadership Styles and Ethical Decision-Making in Hospitality Management”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 486–493, 2009.
37. NIEHOFF, B.P. “Personality Predictors of Participation as a Mentor”, Career Development International, Vol: 11, No: 4, 321-333, 2006.
38. OKURAME, D.E. “Mentoring and Preferences: A Diagnostic Survey For Equal Mentoring Opportunity”, Equal Opportunities International, Vol: 27, No: 6, 519-536, 2008.
39. ORTIZ, D.G. “A Study of The Relationship Between Mentor Leadership Style and Protege Career Advancement”, Our Lady of the Lake University, San Antonio, Texas, 2008.
40. ÖZDAŞLI, K., KANTEN, S. ve KANTEN P. “Yöneticilerin Kariyer İlerleme Arzusu İle Örgütsel Bağlılıklarının, Akıl Hocalığı Eğilimlerine Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, C:14, S:3, 229-243, 2009.
41. SCANDURA, T.A. ve WILLIAMS, E.A. “Mentoring and Transformational Leadership:The Role of Supervisory Career Mentoring”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 448–468, 2004.
42. YUEH, L., CHEN, A., LEE, Y. ve BARNES, F.B. “ The Effects of Leadership Styles on Knowledge-based Customer Relationship Management Implementation”, International Journal of Management and Marketıng Research, Vol: 3, No: 1, 1-18, 2010.
43. UDEH, I.E. ve OMAR, A. “ Strategic Versus Gratuitous Mentoring: A Preliminary Investigation”, Proceedings of the Academy of Strategic Management, Vol: 8, No: 1, 44-47, 2009.