SINIRSIZ SAVAŞ TEORİSİ VE ÜÇ SAVAŞ STRATEJİSİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE ÇİN’İN HİBRİT SAVAŞ YAKLAŞIMI

Öz

Hibrit savaş kavramı 2014 yılında Rusya’nın Kırım’ı ilhakının ardından güvenlik ve savaş çalışmalarında en fazla tartışılan konular arasına yerleşmiştir. Her ne kadar hibrit savaş kavramının ilk detaylı tanımlaması İsrail-Hizbullah Savaşı gözleminden yolan çıkan Frank Hoffman tarafından yapılmış olsa da devam eden yıllarda özellikle Batı ve Rus askeri düşüncesindeki birçok teorisyen ve kuruluş hibrit savaş kavramı üzerine çeşitli tanımlamalarda bulunmuştur. Böylelikle hibrit savaş üzerine oldukça geniş bir literatür oluşmuştur. Ancak söz konusu literatürde Çin’in hibrit savaş kavramına olan yaklaşımı büyük oranda göz ardı edilmektedir. Bu çerçevede, çalışmanın amacı Çin’in hibrit savaş yaklaşımının teori ve pratikteki yansımalarına açıklık getirmektir. Sınırsız savaş teorisi (Unrestricted Warfare) ve üç savaş stratejisi (Three Warfares) Çin’in hibrit savaşa olan yaklaşımının iki ana bileşenini oluşturmaktadır. Buradan yola çıkarak çalışmada iki yaklaşım incelenerek Çin’in hibrit savaşı askeri stratejisinde nasıl konumlandırdığı ve hangi araç, yöntem ve savaş alanlarını hibrit savaş çerçevesinde tanımladığı ortaya konmuştur. Makalenin temel argümanı Çin’in hibrit savaş yaklaşımının geleneksel savaş tanımlamasının bütün sınırlarını aşan ve politik, ekonomik ve askeri savaş metotlarının tamamını kapsayan bir savaş biçimi olduğudur. Makalede ortaya konan argümanı güçlendirmek amacıyla, sınırsız savaş ve üç savaş stratejisi çerçevesinde Çin’in Tayvan’a yönelik hibrit stratejileri incelenmiş ve her iki yaklaşımın Çin’in Tayvan stratejisinde nasıl yer edindiği açıklanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hibrit Savaş
• Sınırsız Savaş Teorisi
• Üç Savaş Stratejisi
• Çin
• Tayvan

CHINA'S HYBRID WARFARE APPROACH WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF UNRESTRICTED WARFARE THEORY AND THREE WARFARES STRATEGY

Öz

Hybrid warfare has become one of the most striking topics in the security and war studies after Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014. Although the first thorough definition of hybrid warfare was made by Frank Hoffman, based on his observation of the Israel-Hezbollah War, in the following years, many theorists and organizations, particularly in Western and Russian military thought, have made numerous definitions on the concept of hybrid warfare. However, China's approach to hybrid warfare is mostly overlooked in the literature. The purpose of the study is to clarify the theoretical basis of China's approach to the concept of hybrid warfare. Unrestricted warfare and three warfares strategies constitute the two main components of China's understanding of hybrid warfare. This study will examine these two strategies and analyses how China positions hybrid warfare in its military strategy. The main argument of the article is that China's hybrid warfare approach goes beyond all boundaries of the traditional warfare and covers all political, economic and military warfares. In order to strengthen the argument, China's hybrid strategies towards Taiwan within the framework of unrestricted warfare and three warfare strategies are examined and how both approaches take a place in China's Taiwan strategy is explained.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hybrid Warfare
• Unrestricted Warfare Theory
• Three Warfares Strategy
• China
• Taiwan

Kaynakça

1. Aoi, C., Futamura, M. & Patalano, A. (2018). Introduction ‘Hybrid Warfare In Asia: Its Meaning And Shape’, The Pacific Review, 31(6), 693-713.
2. Applebaum, A. (2022). China’s War Against Taiwan Has Already Started. The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/12/taiwan-china-disinformation-propaganda-russian-influence/672453/, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2024).
3. Associated Press. (2022). China Says Military Development Of Islands Within Its Rights, https://apnews.com/article/china-beijing-international-law-south-china-sea-4370828e295d2eec9a4804bba9940273, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.04.2024).
4. Bērziņš, J. (2020). The Theory and Practice of New Generation Warfare: The Case of Ukraine And Syria, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 33(3), 355-380.
5. Boot, M. (2015). Countering Hybrid Warfare, Armed Conflict Survey, 1.
6. Chekinov, S.G. & Bogdanov, S.A. (2013). The Nature And Content Of A New-Generation War, Military Thought, 4, 12-23.
7. Cheng, D. (2012). Winning Without Fighting: Chinese Public Opinion Warfare and The Need for a Robust American Response, Washington: Heritage Foundation.
8. Cheng, D. (2012). Winning Without Fighting: Chinese Legal Warfare, Washington: Heritage Foundation.

9. China Defense White Paper. (2019). Beijing: The State Council
10. Cordesman, A. (2020). Chronology Of Possible Chinese Gray Area And Hybrid Warfare Operations, Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
11. Costello J. & McReynolds J. (2018). China’s Strategic Support Force: A Force For A New Era, Washington: National Defense University Press.
12. Cowan, J. L. (2009). A ‘Full Spectrum’ Air Force, Alabama: Air War College.
13. Cox, D., Thomas B. & Alex R. (2012). Why Hybrid Warfare Is Tactics Not Strategy: a Rejoinder to “Future Threats and Strategic Thinking”, Infinity Journal, 2(2), 25-29.
14. European Commission Defence Industry and Space. (2024). Hybrid Threats, https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/hybrid threats_en#:~:text=What%20are%20hybrid%20threats%3F,the%20threshold%20of%20formal%20warfare (Erişim Tarihi: 27.03. 2024).
15. Farmer, B.M. (2023). China’s Cyber Assault On Taiwan. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-cyber-assault-taiwan-60-minutes-2023-06-18/, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2024).
16. Fravel, M.T. (2016). China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 and 2013, J. McReynolds (Ed.), The Evolution of China’s Military Strategy, içinde, Washington: Jamestown Foundation.
17. Fridman, O. (2018). Russian Hybrid Warfare: Resurgence And Politicisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Fridman, O. (2019). A War of Definitions: Hybridity in Russia and The West, O. Fridman, V. Kabernik & J.C. Pearce (Ed.), Hybrid Conflicts and Information Warfare: New Labels, Old Politics, içinde (67-86), Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
19. Friedman, B. (2014). Blurred Lines: The Myth of Guerrilla Tactics, Infinity Journal, 3(4), 25-28.
20. Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in The 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Virginia: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
21. Hoffman, F.G. (2009). Hybrid Warfare And Challenges, Joint Forces Quarterly, 52, 34-48.
22. Huber, T.M. (2002). Compound Warfare: A Conceptual Framework, T. M. Huber (Ed.), Compound Warfare: That Fatal Knot, içinde (1-10), Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College Press.
23. Insisa, A. (2023). Hybrid After All: The ‘Grey Zone’, The ‘Hybrid Warfare’ Debate, And The PLA’s Science Of Military Strategy, Digital Strategic Communication, 12, 165-186.
24. Johnson, R. (2017). Hybrid War And Its Countermeasures: A Critique Of The Literature, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29(1), 141-163.
25. Kabernik, V. (2019). The Russian Military Perspective, O. Fridman, V. Kabernik & J. C. Pearce (Ed.), Hybrid Conflicts and Information Warfare, içinde (43-46), Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
26. Kania, E. (2016). The PLA’s Latest Strategic Thinking On The Three Warfares, China Brief, 16(3), 10-14.
27. Kennedy. C. M. & Erickson, A.S. (2017). China’s Third Sea Force, The People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia: Tethered to the PLA, Newport: U.S. Navy War College.
28. Kilcullen, D. (2009). The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars In The Midst Of A Big One, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Kraska, J. & Monti, M. (2015). The Law of Naval Warfare and China’s Maritime Militia, International Law Studies, 91, 450-467.
30. Lasconjarias, G. & Larsen J. A. (2015). Introduction. G. Lasconjarias & J.A. Larsen (Ed.), NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats, içinde (1-14), Rome: DeBooks.
31. Lasica, D.T. (2009). Strategic Implications Of Hybrid War: A Theory Of Victory, Kansas: United States Army Command and General Staff College.
32. Lee, S. (2014). China’s ‘Three Warfares’: Origins, Applications, and Organizations. Journal of Strategic Studies, 37(2), 198-221.
33. Liang, Q. & Xiangsui, W. (1999). Unrestricted Warfare, Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House. Lind, W.S., Nightengale, K., Schmitt, J.F., Sutton, J.W. & Wilson G.I. (1989). The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation, Marine Corps Gazette, 22-26.
34. McCulloh, T. & Johnson, R. (2013). Hybrid Warfare, Florida: JSOU Press.
35. Mansoor, P. (2012). Introduction: Hybrid Warfare in History, W. Murray & P. Mansoor (Ed.), Hybrid warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from The Ancient World to the Present, içinde (1-17), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mihara, R. (2012). Beyond Future Threats: A Business Alternative To Threat-Based Strategic Planning, Infinity Journal, 2(3), 25-29.
37. Military Balance. (2015). Complex Crises Call for Adaptable and Durable Capabilities. Military Balance, 115(1), 5-8.
38. Mumford, A. & Carlucci, P. (2023). Hybrid Warfare: The Continuation Of Ambiguity By Other Means, European Journal of International Security, 8(2), 192-216.
39. Murray, W. (2012). Conclusion: What The Past Suggests. W. Murray & P. Mansoor (Ed.), Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, içinde (289-308), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Murray, W. ve Mansoor, P.R. (2012). Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to The Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Najžer, B. (2020). The Hybrid Age: International Security in The Era Of Hybrid Warfare, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
42. NATO. (2010). Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Brussels: NATO.
43. NATO. (2014). Wales Summit Declaration, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2024).
44. Okada, W. (2021). China’s Coast Guard Law Challenges Rule-Based Order, The Diplomat, https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/chinas-coast-guard-law-challenges-rule-based-order/, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2024).
45. Reisinger, H. & Golts, A. (2014). Russia’s Hybrid Warfare: Waging War Below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence, Rome: NATO Defense College.
46. Renz, B. (2016). Russia and “Hybrid Warfare”, Contemporary Politics, 22(3), 283-300.
47. Science of Military Campaigns. (2006). (Çev. China Aerospace Institute). Beijing: National Defense University Press.
48. Taiwan National Defense Report. (2023), Taipei: Ministry of National Defense.
49. The Guardian. (2022). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/21/china-has-fully-militarized-three-islands-in-south-china-sea-us-admiral-says, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2024).
50. The Science of Military Strategy. (2013). (Çev. China Aerospace Institute), Beijing: Military Science Press.
51. The Science of Military Strategy. (2020). (Çev. China Aerospace Institute), Beijing: Military Science Press.
52. The US Department of Defense. (2010). Quadrennial Defense Review, Washington: The US Department of Defense.
53. The US Department of Defense. (2011). Military and Security Developments Involving The People’s Republic of China 2011, Washington: The US Department of Defense.
54. Tung, L. (2019). Taiwan and the CCP’s “Public Opinion Warfare”, Taiwan Strategist, (2), 39-60.
55. West, M.J. & Insisa, A. (2023). Reunifying Taiwan with China Through Cross-Strait Lawfare, The China Quarterly, 257, 1-16.
56. Wither, J.K. (2016). Making Sense Of Hybrid Warfare, Connections, 15(2), 73-87.
57. Xiaobo, L. (2023). Language Confrontation in Cognitive Domain Operations. (Çev. China Aerospace Institute), Alabama: China Aerospace Institute.
58. Yamaguchi, N. (2012). An Unexpected Encounter with Hybrid Warfare: Japanese experience in North China, 1937–1945, W. Murray & P.R. Mansoor (Ed.), Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from The Ancient World to The Present, içinde (1–17), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Yoon, S. & Wonhee, K. (2023). The Import Of Hybrid Activities In The South China Sea, Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 93-101.