ÜRETKEN YAPAY ZEKANIN YAKIN GELECEKTE AİLE RUH SAĞLIĞI ÜZERİNE ÖNGÖRÜLERİNİN NİTEL BİR İNCELEMESİ

Öz

Çalışma, üretken yapay zeka programlarının (ChatGPT, Gemini, Groq, Claude.ai, Copilot, DeepAI, DeepSeek) yakın geleceğe yönelik aile ruh sağlığına dair öngörülerini nitel araştırma deseni çerçevesinde incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. 5–11 Mayıs 2025 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilen görüşmelerin içerik analizi yapılmıştır; bulgular üç ana tema altında yapılandırılmıştır: (1) Sosyoekonomik, çevresel, teknolojik ve kolektif travma riskleri, (2) Yakın gelecekte aile ruh sağlığı, (3) Yakın gelecekte aile ruh sağlığı için strateji ve çözüm önerileri. Bulgular teknolojinin, iklim krizi, toplumsal dönüşüm ve ekonomik değişkenlerin aile yapısını ve dinamiklerini derinlemesine etkileyebileceğini göstermektedir. Teknolojinin iletişimi kolaylaştırıcı yönleriyle birlikte, empati eksikliği, sosyal izolasyon, dikkat dağınıklığı, stres, anksiyete ve yalnızlık gibi aile ruh sağlığını tehdit eden unsurları da öne çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca dijital bağımlılık, dijital ebeveynlik yetersizliği, eko-anksiyete gibi yeni psikiyatrik tanıların yaygınlaşabileceği öngörülmektedir. Çalışma, aile bağlarını güçlendirmeye yönelik yapay zeka destekli terapi uygulamaları, kuşaklararası dayanışmayı teşvik eden projeler, ruh sağlığı ve dijital okuryazarlık eğitimleri ile yerel destek ağlarının önemine dikkat çekmektedir. Sonuçta yakın gelecekte aile ruh sağlığı için dijital denge, mahremiyetin korunması, kuşaklararası anlayış ve yapay zeka temelli ruh sağlığı hizmetlerinin geliştirilmesi temel stratejik öncelikler olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : aile ruh sağlığı
• yakın gelecek
• üretken yapay zeka
• nitel araştırma
• içerik analizi

A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE’S PREDICTIONS FOR FAMILY MENTAL HEALTH IN THE NEAR FUTURE

Öz

This study aims to explore the predictions of generative artificial intelligence programs (ChatGPT, Gemini, Groq, Claude.ai, Copilot, DeepAI, DeepSeek) regarding family mental health in the near future, employing a qualitative research design. Interviews conducted between May 5–11, 2025, were subjected to content analysis, and the findings were categorized under three main themes: (1) Socioeconomic, environmental, technological, and collective trauma risks, (2) The trajectory of family mental health in the near future, (3) Strategic approaches and solution proposals for sustaining family mental health in the future. The results indicate that technology, the climate crisis, social transformation, economic factors will profoundly influence family structures and dynamics. While technology facilitates communication, it also contributes to threats such as empathy decline, social isolation, attention deficits, stress, anxiety, loneliness, all of which adversely affect family mental well-being. Furthermore, emerging psychiatric diagnoses —such as digital addiction, inadequate digital parenting, eco-anxiety— are projected to become increasingly prevalent. The study underscores the significance of artificial intelligence-assisted therapeutic interventions, intergenerational support initiatives, mental health and digital literacy education, the establishment of local support networks to enhance familial cohesion. Ultimately, digital balance, privacy protection, intergenerational understanding and the development of artificial intelligence-based mental health services for family mental health in the near future emerge as key strategic priorities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• family mental health
• near future
• generative artificial intelligence
• qualitative research
• content analysis

Kaynakça

1. Balcı, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
2. Barhalescu, M. (2025). The importance of mental health in modern society. Journal of Marine Technology & Environment, 1, 21–24. Doi: 10.53464/JMTE.01.2025.03
3. Barhalescu, M., & Costescu, E. (2023). The role of social media in user health. Journal of Marine Technology and Environment, 2, 7–11. Doi:10.53464/JMTE.02.2023.01
4. Birinci, C. M., & Terkan, R. (2023). İletişim aracı olan sosyal medyanın sosyal değişime kazandırdığı boyut. Journal of Management Theory and Practices Research, 4(2), 180–195.
5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Ecological systems theory (1992). In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 106–173). Sage Publications Ltd.
6. Bryant, R. A. (2019). Post‐traumatic stress disorder: a state‐of‐the‐art review of evidence and challenges. World Psychiatry, 18(3), 259-269. doi: 10.1002/wps.20656
7. Büyükbingöl, A. (2021). Toplum 5.0’a doğru. Ankara: Astana Kitabevi.
8. Büyükuslu, A. R. (2020). Toplum 5.0: Süper Akıllı Toplum. İstanbul: Der Kitabevi.

9. Cavanagh, S. E., & Fomby, P. (2019). Family instability in the lives of American children. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022633
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2021). About mental health. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/learn/index.htm
11. Çaha, Ö. (2022). Yeni medya ve değişen toplumsal hareketler. In Bilişim Teknolojileri ve İletişim: Birey ve Toplum Güvenliği (pp. 247–264). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.
12. Choy, Y. N., Lau, E. Y. H., & Wu, D. (2024). Digital parenting and its impact on early childhood development: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 22147-22187. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12643-w
13. Council of the European Union. (2024, March 13). Artificial Intelligence Act: Council gives final green light to the first worldwide rules on AI. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/03/13/artificial-intelligence-act-council-gives-final-green-light-to-the-first-worldwide-rules-on-ai/
14. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Cummins, R. A. (2024). Homeostasis. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3165–3168). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
16. Dergaa, I., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, S., Loch, A. A., Glenn, J. M., Fessi, M. S., ... & Ben Saad, H. (2024). ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1277756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277756
17. Durmuş, M., & Okanlı, A. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) in psychiatric nursing. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 15(4), 466–467. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2024.75317
18. European Commission. (n.d.). Mental health. https://health.ec.europa.eu/non-communicablediseases/mentalhealth_ro European Parliament. (2022, July 5). Texts adopted: The impact of teleworking and digital tools on mental health. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0279_EN.html
19. Farid, A. S. (2025). The power of faith and social media in healing women’s mental health–a theological study. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(1). Doi: 10.46222/pharosjot.106.7
20. Feher, K. (2025). Generative AI, media, and society. New York: Taylor & Francis. Frans, Ö., Rimmö, P. A., Åberg, L., & Fredrikson, M. (2005). Trauma exposure and post‐traumatic stress disorder in the general population. Acta psychiatrica scandinavica, 111(4), 291-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00463.x
21. Gavrila-Ardelean, M. (2021). Considerations on the mental health of the contemporary family. In Costin & Khurana (Eds.), Contemporary family challenges: Psycho-social Perspective in Romania and India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-6953
22. Gökler, R., & Atamtürk, E. (2021). Ebeveynlik rollerindeki değişim. Sosyal Politika ve Sosyal Hizmet Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 151–177.
23. Graham, S., Depp, C., Lee, E. E., Nebeker, C., Tu, X., Kim, H. C., & Jeste, D. V. (2019). Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: an overview. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(11), 116. Doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0
24. Gunawan, J. (2023). Exploring the future of nursing: Insights from the ChatGPT model. Belitung Nursing Journal, 9(1), 1. doi: 10.33546/bnj.2551
25. Guthrie, D. (2023). How I learned to stop worrying and love the eco-apocalypse: an existential approach to accepting eco-anxiety. Perspectives on psychological science, 18(1), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569162210936
26. Hadfield, K., Amos, M., Ungar, M., Gosselin, J., & Ganong, L. (2018). Do changes to family structure affect child and family outcomes? A systematic review of the instability hypothesis. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12243
27. Hallaç, S., & Öz, F. (2014). Aile kavramına kuramsal bir bakış. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 6(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.5455/cap.20130625102321
28. Hong, S. H., Chun, T. K., Nam, Y. J., Kim, T. W., Cho, Y. H., Son, S. J., ... & Hong, C. H. (2025). Digital mental health ınterventions for adolescents: An integrative review based on the behavior change approach. Children, 12(6), 770. doi: 10.3390/children12060770
29. Jensen, T. M., & Lippold, M. A. (2018). Patterns of stepfamily relationship quality and adolescents’ short-term and long-term adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(8), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000442
30. Jensen, T. M., & Sanner, C. (2021). A scoping review of research on well‐being across diverse family structures: Rethinking approaches for understanding contemporary families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 13(4), 463-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12437
31. Johnson, K. B., Wei, W. Q., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M. E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., ... & Snowdon, J. L. (2021). Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clinical and Translational Science, 14(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12884
32. Kalifia, A. D., Astrianty, L. E., Sanjaya, F. I., & Pramudwiatmoko, A. (2025). Empowering digital parenting through web-based admission system and technology literacy training for families in early childhood education. MEKONGGA: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 30-38. Doi: 10.69616/mekongga.v2i1.218
33. Koçak, Z., & Harmancı, H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde ailede ruh sağlığı. Karatay Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (5), 183–207.
34. Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 13–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_2
35. Kumar, S., Verma, A. K., & Mirza, A. (2024). Digital transformation, artificial intelligence and society. Singapore: Springer.
36. Kılınç, G., Yıldız, E., & Harmancı, P. (2017). Toplumsal travmatik olaylar ve aile ruh sağlığı. Turkiye Klinikleri J Psychiatr Nurs–Special Topics, 3(2), 182–188.
37. Lin-Lewry, M., Nguyen, C. T. T., Huda, M. H., Tsai, S. Y., Chipojola, R., & Kuo, S. Y. (2024). Effects of digital parenting interventions on self-efficacy, social support, and depressive symptoms in the transition to parenthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 185, 105405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105405
38. Luo, Y., Miao, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, J., & Wu, Y. (2025). Exploring the current applications and effectiveness of ChatGPT in nursing: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81, 3473–3484. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16628
39. Mannheim, K. (2000). A nemzedék problémája. In Tudásszociológiai tanulmányok (pp. 213). Budapesta: Osiris.
40. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
41. Menlo Ventures, (2025). 2025: The State of Consumer AI. 2025: The State of Consumer AI | Menlo Ventures
42. Milasan, L. H., & Scott‐Purdy, D. (2025). The future of artificial intelligence in mental health nursing practice: An integrative review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 34(1), e70003. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.70003
43. Niyazova, A., & Madaliyeva, Z. (2022). Impact of resilience on psychological well-being. Journal of Intellectual Disability‐Diagnosis and Treatment, 10(4), 178-186. Doi: 10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.04.3
44. Nuțu, C. S. (2023). Early transhumanism ideas and their extensions regarding evolution of technology and of artificial intelligence. Journal of Marine Technology and Environment, 2, 52–57. DOI: 10.53464/JMTE.
45. Onishi, R. (2024). Parental information-use strategies in a digital parenting environment and their associations with parental social support and self-efficacy: cross-sectional study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 7, e58757. Doi: 10.2196/58757
46. Öztürk, E. (2021). Disfonksiyonel aile modellerinden fonksiyonel aile modeline: “Doğal ve rehber ebeveynlik stili”. Öztürk E, editör. Aile Psiko patolojisi. 1. Baskı. p.1-39. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri.
47. Passmore, H. A., Lutz, P. K., & Howell, A. J. (2023). Eco-anxiety: A cascade of fundamental existential anxieties. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 36(2), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2022.2068706
48. Pihkala, P. (2020). Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability, 12(19), 7836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197836
49. Raley, R. K., & Sweeney, M. M. (2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12651
50. Romash, I., Neyko, V., Romash, I., Dzivak, K., Gerych, P., Panchyshyn, M., ... & Pustovoyt, M. (2022). Post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit: Difficulties of the past and challenges of the future. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, (50 (53)). doi: 10.33120/. https://sciendo.com/journal/SSSPPJ
51. Rush, A. J., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2018). Speculations on the future of psychiatric diagnosis. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(6), 481-487. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000821
52. Russell, L. T., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. (2018). Conceptualizing family structure in a social determinants of health framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12296
53. Saeed, S. A., Cunningham, K., & Bloch, R. M. (2019). Depression and anxiety disorders: Benefits of exercise, yoga, and meditation. American Family Physician, 99(10), 620–627.
54. Sanner, C., & Jensen, T. M. (2021). Toward more accurate measures of family structure: Accounting for sibling complexity. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 13(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12406
55. Scott, D. A., Valley, B., & Simecka, B. A. (2017). Mental health concerns in the digital age. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15, 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9684-0
56. Singh, A. (2021). Mental health and mental disorders. Psycho Information Technologies: New Delhi. Spytska, L. (2024). Anxiety and depressive personality disorders in the modern world. Acta Psychologica, 246, 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104285
57. Syukur, Y., Putra, A. H., Ardi, Z., Zahri, T. N., & Putri, J. E. (2024). Global perspectives on digital parenting: Challenges and opportunities in improving family well-being. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 568, p. 04014). EDP Sciences. Doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202456804014
58. Şahin, İ. M., & Mermutlu, M. B. (2022). Dijitalleşme ve topluma etkisi. SSD Journal, 7(32), 123-131. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31567/ssd.666
59. Umberson, D., & Thomeer, M. B. (2020). Family matters: Research on family ties and health, 2010 to 2020. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12640
60. Tan, C. Y., Xu, N., Liang, M., & Li, L. (2025). Meta-analysis of associations between digital parenting and children’s digital wellbeing. Educational Research Review, 100699. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100699
61. Tang, Y., & Liu, J. (2025). Digital parenting and children’s subjective well-being: the mediation role of children’s digital overuse. Child Indicators Research, 1-18. Doi: 10.1007/s12187-025-10271-5
62. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
63. Trisnawaty, T., HS, F., Ondeng, S., & Usman, S. (2025). Parent and teacher challenges in navigating the digital era. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 4(2), 539–549. doi: 10.58917/aijes.v4i2.334
64. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Genişletilmiş 7. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
65. Yiğit, S. (2023). Yapay zeka gastronomi eğitimine katkı sunabilir mi? ChatGPT örneği (Can artificial intelligence contribute to gastronomy education? Example of ChatGPT). Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 11(3), 1970-1982. DOI: 10.21325/jotags.2023.1276
66. Yousefi Afrashteh, M., Hanifeh, P., & Morovati, Z. (2024). The relationship between family resilience and the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of pregnant women: The mediating role of individual resilience. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 60. Doi:10.1186/s40359-024-01547-6
67. Yuryeva, L., Vyshnichenko, S., & Shornikov, A. (2022). Analysis of the phenomena of anxiety and depression in the first weeks of the war: gender-age aspects. Psychosomatic medicine and general practice, 7(1), e0701351.
68. Watanabe, A. (2025). Assertiveness skills training based on the process model of social skills. Psychology in the Schools, 62, 3184–3194. Doi: 10.1002/pits.23534
69. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2022). WHO European framework for action on mental health 2021–2025. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
70. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2002). Reducing risks, promoting healthy life, World Health Report, Geneva.
71. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2018). Mental health: strengthening our response, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response.
72. Zhara, G. I. (2022). Psychosomatic manifestations of anxiety and depression in students in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. In Actual problems of public health: Materials of the 12th international scientific and practical conference “education and health” (pp. 23–25). NMU named after O.O. Bogomolets: Kyiv