EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS ON THE AUDIT RISK OF EARNING-BASED VARIABLES

Öz

Being able to get quality and reasonable information is an high lyimportant in terms of information users. The financial statements that is a basic way to acquire knowledge related to the businesses requires including reasonable information because the information users should not make wrong decision about businesses. In order to get real information, audit risk should be evaluated well. The aim of this research is to determine whether earning-based variables that were gotten from financial statements affect audit risk probability or not. With this aim 2014 data of businesses that are active in the ISE
Industrial Index were formed by being used the audit reports, financial statements and some of the performance ratios of these businesses. These data were assessed by being used the logistic regression anaysis method. It was drawn to conclusion that five of these variables are related to the audit risk that is dependent variable in consequence of this study which was done by using 12 independent variables in total. One of the variables that affect audit risk is “earning per share” on gain based variables.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Audit Risk,Earning-Based Variables

KAZANÇ TEMELLİ DEĞİŞKENLERİN DENETİM RİSKİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Kaliteli ve gerçeğe uygun bilgi edinebilmek bilgi kullanıcıları açısından son derece önemlidir. İşletmeler ile ilgili temel bilgi edinme yolu olan finansal tablolar bilgi kullanıcılarının işletme hakkında yanlış karar vermemeleri için, gerçeğe uygun bilgiler içermesi gereklidir. Gerçek bilginin elde edilebilmesi için denetim riskinin iyi değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, finansal tablolardaki kalemlerden elde edilen kazanç temelli değişkenlerin, denetim riski olasılığını etkileyip etkilemediğinin tespit edilmesidir. Bu amaçla BİST Sınai Endeksi’nde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin 2014 yılı verileri, bu işletmelerin denetim raporları, finansal tabloları ve performans oranlarından bazıları kullanılarak oluşturulmuştur.
Bu veriler lojistik regresyon analizi yöntemi kullanılarak değerlendirilmektedir. Toplam 12 bağımsız değişken kullanılarak yapılan çalışmanın sonucunda, bu değişkenlerden 5 tanesinin, bağımlı değişken olan denetim riski ile ilişkili olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Kazanç temelli değişkenlerden “hisse başına kazanç” değişkeni denetim riskini etkileyen değişkenlerdendir.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Denetim Riski,Kazanç Temelli Değişkenler

Kaynakça

1. Abbott, L. J.& Parker, S. (2000), The Effect of Audit Committee Activity and Independence on Corporate Fraud, Managerial Finance, 26(11),55-68.
2. Abbott, L. J. & Parker, S. & Peters, G.F.(2004), Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements, A Journal Of Practice&Theory, 23(1), 69-87.
3. Akün, L. (1988), Finansal Tabloların Denetiminde Risk Faktörü, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 55-61.
4. Altunışık, R. & Yıldırım, E. & Coşkun, R. &Bayraktaroğlu, S.(2007), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı, Adapazarı: Sakarya, Sakarya Yayıncılık.
5. Ata, H. A.&Seyrek, İ. H.(2009), The Use Of Data Mining Techniques In Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements: An Application On Manufacturing Firms, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,14(2), 157-170.
6. Beasley, M. S.(1996), An Emprical Analysis of The Relation Between The Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud, The Accounting Review,71(4), (October), 443-465.
7. Beasley, M. S.&Carcello, J. V. &Hermanson D. R.(1999), Fraudulent Financial Reporting 1987-1997, An Analysis of U.S. Public Company, Committee of Sponsoring Organization of The Treadway Commission, (COSO), http://www.coso.org/publications/FFR_1987_1997.PDF (19.06.2015).
8. Beasley, M. S.&Carcello, J. V.&Hermanson, D. R.& Lapides, P. D. (2000), Fraudulent Financial Reporting; Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanism, Accounting Horizons, 14(4),441-454.

9. Beasley, M. S.& Carcello, J. V.& Hermanson, D. R.&Neal, T. L. (2010), Fraudulent Financial Reporting 1998-2007, An Analysis of U.S. PublicCompanies, Committee of Sponsoring Organization of The Treadway Commission, (COSO), http://www.coso.org/documents/cosofraudstudy2010_001.pdf (20.11.2015).
10. Becker, C. L.& Defond, M. L.&Jiambalvo, J.&Subramanyam, K.R.(1998), TheEffect of Audit Quality on Earning Management, Contemporary Accounting Research,15(1),1-24.
11. Beneish, Messod D.& Press, E. (1993), Cost of Technical Violation of Accounting Based Debt Covenants, The Accounting Review, 68(2), 233-257.
12. Bozkurt, N. (2012), Muhasebe Denetimi, İstanbul: Alfa.
13. Contessotto, C.& Moroney, R.(2014), The Association Between Audit Committee Effectiveness and Audit Risk, Accounting and Finance, 54(2), 393-418.
14. Çokluk, Ö.(2010), Lojistik Regresyon Analizi: Kavram ve Uygulama, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3), 1357-1407.
15. Dechow, P. M. & Sloan, R. G. & Sweeney, A. P.(1996), Causesand Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firm Subject to Enforcement Actions by The SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.
16. Dunn, P. (2004), TheImpact Of InsiderPower On Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Journal Of Management, 30(3), 397-412.
17. Fama, E. F.& Jensen, M. C.(1983), Separation of Ownershipand Control, Journal of Law and Economics,26(2), 301-325.
18. Fanning, K. M. &Cogger, K. O.(1998), Neural Network Detection Of Management Fraud Using Published Financial Data, International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance&Management, 7(1), 21-41.
19. Güredin, E. (1997), Denetim, İstanbul: Avcıol.
20. Grove, H.& Basilico, E. (2008), Fraudulent Financial Reporting Detection: Key Ratios Plus Corporate Governance Factors, International Studies of Management and Organization, 38(3), 10-42.
21. Hermalin, B. E.&Weisbach M. S.(1988), The Determinants Of Board Composition, RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589-606.
22. Hill, C. W.L.&Phan, P. (1991), CEO Tenure As A Determinant of CEO Pay, The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 707-717.
23. Kaval, H. (2008), Muhasebe Denetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
24. Kiracı, M.& Yılancı, M. & Yıldız, B.(2012), Muhasebe Denetimi, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
25. Kirkos, E.& Spathis, C.& Manolopoulos, Y. (2007), Data Mining Techniques for The Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statements, Expert Systems with Application, 32(4), 995-1003.
26. Knapp, C. A.& Knapp, M. C. (2001), The Effects Of Experience and Explicit Fraud Risk Assestment in Detecting Fraud With Analytical Procedures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(1), 25-37.
27. Küçük, E. (2009), Hileli Finansal Raporlamanın Engellenmesinde Kurumsal Yönetim ve Dış Denetimin Rolü: Türkiye’deki Denetim Firmalarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
28. Lanis, R.&Richardson, G.(2011), The Effect of Board of Director Composition on Corporate Tax Aggressiveness, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.
29. ____________________ (2015), Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?, Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 439-457.
30. Loebbecke, J. K.& Eining, M. M.& Willingham, J. J.(1989), Auditors’ Experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature and Detectability, Auditing: A Journal of Practise&Theory, (9), 1-28.
31. Nargeleçekenler, M. (2011), Hisse Senedi Fiyatları ve Fiyat/Kazanç Oranı İlişkisi: Panel Verilerle Sektörel Bir Analiz, Business and Economics Research Journal,2(2), 165-184.
32. Newman, D. P. & Patterson, E. & Smith, R.(2001), The Influence of Potentially Fraudulent Reports on Audit Risk Assessment and Planning, The Accounting Review, 76(1), 59-80.
33. Özdemir, F. S. (2011), Finansal Raporlama Sistemlerinin Bilginin İhtiyaca Uygunluğu Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: İMKB Şirketlerinde Finansal Başarısızlık Tahminleri Yönüyle Bir Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
34. Persons, O. S.(1995), Using Financial Statement Data to Identify Factors Associated with Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Journal of Applied Business Research, (3),38-46.
35. __________ (2006), Corporate Governance and Non-Financial Reporting Fraud, Journal of Business &EconomicStudies, 12(1), 27-39.
36. Saksena, P. (1997), An Emprical Analysis Of The Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Management Fraud, Doctor of Philosophy, Georgia StateUniversity.
37. Skousen, C. (2004), An Emprical Investigation of The Relevance and Predictive Ability of The SAS 99 Fraud Risk Factor, Doctor of Philosophy, Oklahomo State University.
38. Skousen, C.& Wright, C. J.(2006), Contemporaneous Risk Factorsand The Prediction of Financial Statement Fraud, Working Paper, Utah State University-School Of Accountancy
39. Spathis, C. & Doumpos, M. & Zopounidis, C.(2002), Detecting Falsified Financial Statements: A Comparative Study Using Multicriteria Analysis and Multivariate Statistical Techniques, The European Accounting Review, 11(3), 509-535.
40. Sun, L. (2007), A Re-evalution of Auditors’ Opinions Versus Statistical Models in Bankruptcy Prediction, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(1), 55-78.
41. URL, http://notoku.com/hisse-senedi-degerlemesi (26.08.2016)
42. Varıcı, İ. (2011), Hile Riski ve Denetçinin Sorumluluğu: Hile Riskinin Ölçülmesine Yönelik Bir Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi - Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.