Dijital Girişimcilik Niyetinin Girişimcilik Eğitimi ve Planlı Davranış Teorisi Bağlamında İncelenmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 81 - 96, 30.06.2025

Mustafa Öztorun , İbrahim Efe Efeoğlu

https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.1621855

Öz

Bu araştırma, üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital girişimcilik eğitimi almalarının dijital girişimcilik girişimlerini sürdürme niyetlerini nasıl şekillendirdiğini incelemektedir. Çalışma, planlı davranış teorisinden üç temel unsuru - kişisel tutumlar, sosyal normlar ve algılanan davranışsal kontrol - içeren kapsamlı bir çerçeve kullanarak bunların dijital girişimcilik niyetleri üzerindeki etkisini anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca araştırma, demografik değişkenlerin bu niyetlerin şekillenmesinde rol oynayıp oynamadığını araştırmaktadır. Araştırma metodolojisi nicel bir yaklaşım izlemekte olup, veriler kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 389 üniversite öğrencisinden çevrimiçi anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Ölçüm aracı, kişisel tutumları, sosyal normları, davranışsal kontrolü ve dijital girişimcilik niyetlerini değerlendiren ölçeklerin yanı sıra demografik soruları içermektedir. İstatistiksel analizler SPSS 26 versiyonu kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, hem dijital girişimcilik eğitiminin hem de kişisel tutumların öğrencilerin dijital girişimcilik niyetlerinin önemli pozitif yordayıcıları olarak ortaya çıktığını göstermektedir. Benzer şekilde, algılanan davranışsal kontrol de önemli bir pozitif etki göstermiştir. Ancak, beklentilerin aksine, ne sosyal normlar ne de demografik faktörler dijital girişimcilik niyetleriyle anlamlı ilişkiler göstermemiştir. Bu sonuçlar, eğitim kurumlarının öğrenciler arasında dijital girişimciliği teşvik etmedeki hayati rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, dijital girişimcilik eğitiminin dijital alandaki girişimcilik niyetleri üzerindeki doğrudan etkisini göstererek, dijital girişimcilik eğitimi konusundaki bilgi birikimine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu bulgular, üniversitelerin dijital girişimci adayları için daha etkili dijital girişimcilik programları ve destek sistemleri tasarlamasına yardımcı olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital girişimcilik , girişimcilik eğitimi , planlı davranış teorisi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

Investigation of Digital Entrepreneurship Intention in the Context of Entrepreneurship Education and the Theory of Planned Behavior

Öz

This research investigates how university students' exposure to digital entrepreneurship education shapes their intentions to pursue digital entrepreneurship ventures. The study employs a comprehensive framework incorporating three key aspects from the theory of planned behavior - personal attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control - to understand their influence on digital entrepreneurship intentions. Additionally, the research explores whether demographic variables play a role in shaping these intentions. The research methodology follows a quantitative approach, with data collected through an online survey from 389 university students selected through convenience sampling. The measurement instrument incorporated validated scales assessing personal attitudes, social norms, behavioral control, and digital entrepreneurship intentions, along with demographic indicators. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 software. The findings reveal that both digital entrepreneurship education and personal attitudes emerge as significant positive predictors of students' digital entrepreneurship intentions. Similarly, perceived behavioral control demonstrated a substantial positive influence. However, contrary to expectations, neither social norms nor demographic factors showed significant relationships with digital entrepreneurship intentions. These results underscore the vital role of educational institutions in fostering digital entrepreneurship among students. The study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on digital entrepreneurship education by demonstrating its direct impact on entrepreneurial intentions in the digital space. These insights can help universities design more effective digital entrepreneurship programs and support systems for aspiring digital entrepreneurs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital entrepreneurship , entrepreneurship education , theory of planned behavior

Etik Beyan

It is declared that scientific and ethical principles were followed during the preparation of this study, and all utilized works are cited in the references.

Kaynakça

• Ademi, L., Ramadani, V., Ibraimi, S., & Idrizi, S. (2025). Factors affecting young people's intentions to engage in digital entrepreneurship: An analysis employing the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 4(1), 83-105.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• Alkhalaileh, M. (2021). Systematic review: Digital entrepreneurship intention. Network Intelligence Studies, 9(17), 25-34.
• Autio, E., H. Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., GC Parker, G., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145-160.
• Balgiu, B. A., & Simionescu-Panait, A. (2024). Entrepreneurial intention in Romanian engineering students: Expanding the theory of planned behavior. Administrative Sciences, 14(11), 275.
• Basu, A., & Virick, M. (2008). Assessing entrepreneurial intentions amongst students: A comparative study. In VentureWell. Proceedings of Open, the Annual Conference (pp. 79-86). National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance.
• Bozkurt, O. C. (2014). The investigation of students’ intentions of being an entrepeneur within the frame of planned behaviour theory. Journal of Economics and Management Research, 3(1), 27-47.
• Do Paço, A., Ferreira, J. M., Raposo, M., Rodrigues, R. G., & Dinis, A. (2015). Entrepreneurial intentions: is education enough?. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(1), 57-75.
• Duong, C. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and digital entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical research based on the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(2), 129-142.
• Dutot, V., & Van Horne, C. (2015). Digital entrepreneurship intention in a developed vs. emerging country: An exploratory study in France and the UAE. Transnational Corporations Review, 7(1), 79-96.
• Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Effect and counter-effect of entrepreneurship education and social context on student's intentions. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 24(2), 509-523.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
• Iqbal, A., Melhem, Y., & Kokash, H. (2012). Readiness of the university students towards entrepreneurship in Saudi Private University: An exploratory study. European Scientific Journal, 8(15), 109-131.
• Ismail, M., Khalid, S. A., Othman, M., Jusoff, H. K., Rahman, N. A., Kassim, K. M., & Zain, R. S. (2009). Entrepreneurial intention among Malaysian undergraduates. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(10), 54-60.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2016). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (7. Baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kautonen, T., Van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655-674.
• Khuong, M. N., & Ann, N. H. (2016). The factors affecting entrepreneurial intention of the students of Vietnam national university—a mediation analysis of perception toward entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(2), 104-111.
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
• Koe, W. L., Sa’ari, J. R., Majid, I. A., & Ismail, K. (2012). Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among millennial generation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 197-208.
• Kraus, S., Palmer, C., Kailer, N., Kallinger, F. L., & Spitzer, J. (2018). Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 1-24.
• Krischanan Kampanthong, T. P. (2021). Antecedents of digital entrepreneurial intention. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), 7099-7109.
• Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.
• Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
• Lerro, A., Schiuma, G., & Manfredi, F. (2022). Entrepreneurial development and digital transformation in creative and cultural industries: Trends, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(8), 1929-1939.
• Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
• Linan, F., & Rodriguez, J .C. (2004). Entrepreneurial attitues of Andalusian University students. 44th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regions and Fiscal Federalism", 25th - 29th August 2004, Porto, Portugal.
• Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2007). Does social capital affect entrepreneurial intentions?. International Advances in Economic Research, 13(4), 443-453.
• Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C., & Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195-218.
• Morales-Pérez, S., Garay-Tamajón, L. A., Corrons-Giménez, A., & Pacheco-Bernal, C. (2022). The antecedents of entrepreneurial behaviour in the creation of platform economy initiatives: An analysis based on the decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Heliyon, 8(10), e11078.
• Moriano, J. A., Gorgievski, M., Laguna, M., Stephan, U., & Zarafshani, K. (2012). A cross-cultural approach to understanding entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Career Development, 39(2), 162-185.
• Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
• Olan, F., Troise, C., Damij, N., & Newbery, R. (2024). Refocusing digital entrepreneurship: An updated overview of the field, emerging opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 238-257.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
• Ramadani, V., Jashari, F., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., & Palalić, R. (2021). Digital entrepreneurship intentions: evidence from Kosovo. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 18(4), 399-417.
• Robledo, J. L. R., Aran, M. V., Martin-Sanchez, V., & Molina M. A. R. (2015). The moderating role of gender on entrepreneurial intentions: a tpb perspective. Intangible Capital, 11(1), 92-117.
• Sánchez, J. C. (2013). The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 447-465.
• Sánchez-Escobedo, M. D. L. C., Díaz-Casero, J. C., Hernández-Mogollón, R., & Postigo-Jiménez, M. V. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes towards entrepreneurship. An analysis of gender among university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 443-463.
• Santos-Cumplido, F. J., & Liñán, F. (2007). Measuring entrepreneurial quality in southern Europe. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3(1), 87-107.
• Shook, C. L., & Bratianu, C. (2010). Entrepreneurail intent in a transactional economy an application of the theory of planned behavior to Romanian students. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 6(3), 231-347.
• Sitaridis, I., & Kitsios, F. (2024). Digital entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 277-304.
• Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591.
• Van Gelderen, M., Brand, M., Praag, M. V., Bodewes, W., Poutsma, E., & Gils, A. V. (2008). Explaning entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behavior. Career Development International, 13(6), 538-559.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. YÖK (2023). Yükseköğretimde yeni istatistikler. https://www.yok.gov.tr/
• Zain, Z. M., Akram, A. M., & Ghani, E. K. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention among Malaysian business students. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 34-44.
• Zainal, N. T. A., & Yong, K. (2020). Examining the digital entrepreneurship education effectiveness on soft skills among undergraduates. MANU Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu dan Bahasa (PPIB), 31(1), 139-151.
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381-404.