Dry Matter Yields and Some Quality Features of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Cultivars under Two Different Locations of Turkey

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 0 - , 08.06.2016

Osman Yüksel , Sebahattin Albayrak , Mevlüt Türk , Cafer Sevimay

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.25487

Cited By: 5

Öz

This research was conducted to determine the dry matter yields and some quality features of alfalfa cultivars in Ankara and Isparta locations of Turkey. In this study, six alfalfa cultivars, (Daisy, Prosementi, Savas, Bilensoy, Gea) which one of them is candidate were tested in the randomized block design with three replications in 2007-2009 growing seasons. According to the results, significant differences were determined in terms of plant height, main stem diameter, stem number, dry matter yield, crude protein ratio, ADF and NDF contents of alfalfa cultivars. The highest plant heights were determined from Candidate and Prosementi in Ankara, Candidate, Bilensoy and Prosementi in Isparta. The highest stem numbers were determined in Prosementi, Bilensoy and Candidate in Isparta location. Daisy and Candidate had the highest crude protein content and they had the lowest NDF and ADF contents in both locations of the study. While the highest dry matter yield was obtained from Candidate in Ankara, it was obtained from Candidate and Daisy in Isparta. At the end of the study, for the high dry matter yield and quality candidate cultivar is more suitable for Ankara, while candidate and daisy cultivars are more suitable for Isparta location. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alfalfa; Cultivar; Dy matter yield; Crude protein ratio; NDF; ADF

Kaynakça

• [1] Barnes, R.F., Miller, D.A., Nelson, C.J. 1995. Forages. Vol. I: An introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Iowa State University Pres. Ames, Iowa, USA.
• [2] Rowell, D.R. 1996. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman, Harlow.
• [3] Anonymous, 2010a. Turkish State Meteorological Service, Ankara, Turkey.
• [4] Bozkurt, Y., Kaya, I. 2010. A Research Based Evaluation of the Natural Grasslands within the Aspect of Sustainable Livestock Production Systems in Highlands of the Eastern Turkey. J. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fac. vol. 16 iss. 6, p. 1045.
• [5] Anonymous, 2010b. Method for Determining ADF and NDF A200-A220, Ankom Technology http://www.ankom.com/analytical-procedures.aspx (accessed February 20.2014)
• [6] Tucak, M., Popovic, S., Cuplic, T., Krizmanic, G., Spanic, V., Simic, B., Meglic, V. 2014. Agro-morphological and Forage Quality Traits of Selected Alfalfa Populations and Their Application in Breeding. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1), 79-83.
• [7] Acikgoz, E. 2001. Forage Crops. Uludağ Uni., Faculty of Agric., Field Crop Dep., Bursa. Turkey, 584 p.
• [8] Demiroglu, G., Geren, H., Avcioglu, R. 2008. Adaptation of Different Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Genotypes under Aegean Region Conditions. E.U. Faculty of Agriculture, Electronic Journal, vol. 45, iss. 1, p. 1-10.
• [9] Tosun, F. 1974. Legume and Grass Forage Crops Culture. Ataturk Uni. Agri. Fac. Press, Erzurum, Turkey, no:123.
• [10] Bilensoy, C. 1985. Breeding of Alfalfa Kayseri: Project Report. TOKB Project and App. Aff. Pasture and Meadow and Anim. Sci. Ress. Inst. Ankara, Turkey. p.171-187.
• [11] Acar, A.A. 2002. Determination of the slfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars suitable for Tokat-Kazova ecological conditions. Gaziosmanpasa Uni. Science Inst. Master Thesis, 54 p, Tokat, Turkey.
• [12] Altinok, S., Karakaya, A. 2002. Forage Yield of Different Alfalfa Cultivars under Ankara Conditions. Turk J Agric., vol. 26, p. 11-16.
• [13] Kir, B., Soya, H. 2008. The Investigation on Some Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Pasture Type Alfalfa Cultivars. E.U. Faculty of Agriculture, Electronic Journal, 45 (1): 11-19.
• [14] Turan, N. 2010. A research on the yield and yield characteristics of some alfaalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars grown in different sowing times. Yuzuncu Yil Uni., Science Inst., PhD Thesis 166 p. Van, Turkey.
• [15] Sabanci, C.O., Ertus, M.M., Celebi Zorer, S. 2013. Collection, Conservation for Forage Yield of Alfalfa Landraces Grown in East Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18(1), 46-51.
• [16] Tucak, M., Popovic, S., Bolaric, S., Kozumplik, V. 2008. Agronomic Evaluation of Alfalfa Genotypes under Ecological Conditions of Eastern Croatia. Cereal Research Communications, vol. 36, supp. l, p. 651-654.
• [17] Grewal, S.H., Williams, R. 2003. Liming and Cultivars Affect Root Growth, Nodulation, Leaf to Stem Ratio, Herbage Yield and Elemental Composition of Alfalfa on an Acid Soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 26, iss. 8, p. 1683-1696.
• [18] Tongel, M.O., Ayan, I. 2010. Nutritional Contents and Yields Performances of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) Cultivars in Southern Black Sea Shores. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 9, iss. 15, p.2067-2073.
• [19] Canbolat, O., Karaman, S. 2009. Comparison of In Vitro Gas Production, Organic Matter Digestibility, Relative Feed Value and Metabolizable Energy Contents of Some Legume Forages. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. vol. 15, iss. 2, p. 188.
• [20] Cerci, H.I., Erisir, Z., Gurdogan, F., Seven, I., Patir, B., Dikici, A., Kilinc, U., Ciftci, M. 2011. Effects of Fresh, Ensiled and Dried Alfalfa On Performance, Carcass and Organoleptic Characteristics in Lambs. Kafkas Uni. Journal of Vet. Faculty, vol. 17, iss. 1, p. 107.
• [21] Tremblay, G.F., Michaud. R., Bélanger, G. 2003. Protein Fractions and Ruminal Undegradable Proteins in Alfalfa. Can. J. Plant Sci, vol. 83, p. 555–559.
• [22] Sehu. A., Yalcin. S., Onol, A.G., Kocak, D. 1998. Prediction of Dry Matter Intake and Live Weight Gain in Lambs by Some Characteristics of Roughages. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Siciences, vol. 22, iss. 6, p. 475-484.
• [23] Sayan, Y., Ozkul, H., Alcicek, A., Coskuntuna, L., Onenc, S.S., Polat, M. 2004. Comparison of the Parameters Using for Determination of Metabolizable Energy Value of the Roughages. E.U. Faculty of Agriculture, Electronic Journal, vol. 41, iss. 2, p. 167-175.
• [24] Tessema, Z., Baars, R.M.T. 2006. Chemical Composition Dry Matter Production and Yield Dynamics of Tropical Grasses Mixed with Perennial Forage Legumes. Tropical Grasslands, vol. 40, p. 150-156.
• [25] Thorvaldsson, G. 2006. Digestibility of Timothy, Timothy Productivity and Forage Quality Possibilities and Limitations. NJF Seminar 384, Agricultural University of Iceland, Akureyri, Iceland, p.85-88.
• [26] Metochis, C., Orphanos, P.L. 1981. Alfalfa Yield and Water Use When Forced into Dormancy by Withholding Water During the Summer. Agronomy Journal, vol. 73, p. 1048-1050.
• [27] Sevimay, C.S. 1992. The Factors Effecting Seed Setting of the Clones of Elci's Alfalfa and Hay Production of the Selected Colones Progenies in Ankara Conditions. Ankara Uni. Science Ins. (PhD Thesis) Ankara, Turkey, 174 p.
• [28] Colombari, G., Martinetti, L., Maggiore, T. 1994. Yield Response of Cultivars and Ecotypes of Lucerne (abstract). Plant Breeding, vol. 64, no: 3.
• [29] Sengul, S., Tahtacioglu, L. 1996. Determining of Hay Yield and Crude Protein Content of Different Alfalfa Lines and Cultivars under Erzurum Ecological Conditions. Turkey 3rd Grassland and Forage Crops Congress. 17-19 June 1996. p. 608-614. Erzurum, Turkey.
• [30] Cevheri, A.C. 1998. Investigations on yield and some yield properties of 11 different alfalfa cultivars under Bornova ecological conditions. Ege University Science Inst. (Master Thesis) Izmir, Turkey, 34 p.
• [31] Aka, M.A., Avcıoglu, R. 2003. Investigation on the yield and some other yield characteristics of seven different alfalfa varieties under Selcuk conditions. Turkey 5th Field Crops Congress. 13-17 Oct. 2003. Vol. I: 533-536. Dicle Uni. Diyarbakir, Turkey.
• [32] Annicchiario, P. 2007. Lucerne Shoot and Root Traits Associated with Adaptation to Favorable or Drought-Stress Environments and to Contrasting Soil Types. Field Crops Research, vol. 102, p. 51-59.