Investigations on Machinability of Al₂O₃ Reinforced Al6061 Metal Matrix Composites

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 434 - 441, 20.10.2016

Ali Günen , Erdoğan Kanca

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.72984

Cited By: 2

Öz

In this study, six different MMCs containing Al6061 matrix and Al₂O₃ reinforcements with particle sizes of 32 µm and 66 µm and weight fraction of 10%, 15% and 20% were produced using the vortex method. Machinability tests were conducted at different feed rates and cutting speeds to determine the surface roughness and cutting forces. Result of the tests indicated that the cutting forces positively correlated with the feed rates. Increasing in the cutting speed result in decrease in the cutting forces. The cutting forces did not remarkably vary with respect to the particle size for the same feed rates. The surface roughness negatively correlated with the particle weight fraction. Better surface qualities were obtained at lower feed rates and higher cutting speeds.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Metal-matrix composites (MMCs), Statistical properties/methods; Surface analysis; Machining

Kaynakça

• [1] Pramanik, A., Zhang. L.C., Arsecularatne, J.A. 2008. Deformation Mechanisms of MMCs under Indentation, Composites Science and Thecnology 68, 1304-1312.
• [2] Garcia, J. 2011. Microstructure Investigations and Mechanical Properties of an Al-Al2O3 MMC Produced by Semi-solid Solidification. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech 42(6), 542-548.
• [3] Degischer, H.P., Prader, P., San, Marchi, C. 2001. Assesment of Metal Matrix Composites for Innovations. Intermediate Report of a European Thematic Netrwork Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32, 1161-1166.
• [4] Park, B.G., Crosky, A.G., Hellier, A.K., 2001. Material Characterisation and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3-Al Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Materials Science, 36, 2417-2426.
• [5] Seeman, M., Ganesan, G., Karthikeyan, R., Velayudham, A. 2010. Study on Tool Wear and Surface Roughness in Machining of Particulate Aluminum Metal Matrix Composite-Response Surface Methodology Approach. International Journal of Advenced Manufacturing Technology, 48, 613–624.
• [6] Durante, S., Rutelli, G., Rabezzana, F. 1997. Aluminum-based MMC Machining with Diamond-coated Cutting Tools. Surface Coating Technology, 94-95, 632-640.
• [7] Hung, N.P., Loh, N.L., Xu, Z.M. 1996. Cumulative Tool Wear in Machining Metal Matrix Composites Part II: Machinability. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 58, 114-120.
• [8] Manna, A., Bhattacharyya, B. 2002. A Study on Different Tooling Systems During Machining of Al/SiC – MMC. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 123, 476-482.
• [9] Ding, A., Liewb, W.Y.H., Liu, X.D. 2005. Evaluation of Machining Performance of MMC with PCBN and PCD Tools. Wear, 259, 1225-1234.
• [10] Ramulu, M., Rao, P.N., Kao, H. 2002. Drilling of (Al2O3)p/6061 Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 124, 244-254.
• [11] Luliano, L., Settineri, L, Gatto, A. 1998. High Speed Turning Experiments on Metal Matrix Composites. Composites Part A, 29A, 1501-1509.
• [12] Sahin, Y., Kok, M., Celik, H. 2002. Tool Wear and Surface Roughness of Al2O3 Particle-Reinforced Aluminium Alloy Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 128, 280-291.
• [13] Manna, A., Bhattacharayya, B. 2003. A study on Machinability of Al/SiC- MMC. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140, 711-71.
• [14] Ciftci, I., Turker, M., Seker, U. 2004. CBN Cutting Tool Wear during Machining of Particulate Reinforced MMCs. Wear, 257, 1041-1046.
• [15] Muthukrishnan, N., Murugan, M., Prahlada R.K. 2008. An Investigation on the Machinability of Al-SiC Metal Matrix Composites Using PCD Inserts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38, 447-454.
• [16] Kannan, S., Kishawy, H.A., Deiab. I. 2009. Cutting Forces and TEM Analysis of the Generated Surface during Machining Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 2260–2269.
• [17] Bhushan, R.K., Kumar, S., Das, S. 2010. Effect of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness and Tool Wear for 7075 Al Alloy SiC Composite. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50, 459–469.
• [18] Hung, N.P., Loh, N.L., Xu, Z.M. 1996).Cumulative Tool Wear in Machining Metal Matrix Composites Part II. Modelling Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 58, 109-113.
• [19] Pramanik, A., Zhang, L.C., Arsecularatne, J.A., 2006. Prediction of Cutting Forces in Machining of Metal Matrix Composites. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46, 1795–1803.
• [20] Basheer, A.C., Dabade, U.A., Joshi, S.S., Bhanuprasad, V.V., Gadre, V.M. 2008. Modeling of Surface Roughness in Precision Machining of Metal Matrix Composites Using ANN. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 197, 439–444.
• [21] Kok, M., 2011. Modelling the Effect of surface Roughness Factors in the Machining of 2024Al/Al2O3 Particle Composites Based on Orthogonal Arrays. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55, 911–920.
• [22] Sikder, S., Kishawy, H.A., 2012. Analytical Model for Force Prediction When Machining Metal Matrix Composite. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 59, 95–103.