En Uygun Otomobilin Gri İlişkisel Analiz ve Electre Yöntemleri İle Seçimi

Öz

Gxh#wr#lwv#lqkhuhqw#glyhuvlw|#dqg#frpshwlwlyhqhvv/#dxwrpreloh#lqgxvwu|#riihuv#ydulhw|#ri#eudqgv#dqg#prghov1#Wkhuh#duh#kdugzduh)vkdsh0uhodwhg#gliihuhqfhv#ehwzhhq#hdfk#vlqjoh#eudqg#dqg#prgho1#Wkhvh#gliihuhqfhv#khosv#wkh#folhqwv#pdnh#hdvlhu#dqg#uholdeoh#ghflvlrqv1#Vr#idu/#wkhuh#duh#qrw#wrr#pdq|#pxowl0fulwhuld#fkrrvlqj#prghov#ghyhorshg#iru#dxwrpreloh#lqgxvwu|1#Wkhuhiruh/#wkh#dssolfdwlrq#ri#wzr#gliihuhqw#phwkrgv#lq#wklv#vwxg|#kdv#frqwulexwhg#lqqrydwlrq#wr#wkh#olwhudwxuh1#Wkh#sxusrvh#ri#wklv#vwxg|#lv#wr#fkrrvh#wkh#prvw#dssursuldwh#fdu#dprqj#ydulrxv#eudqgv)prghov#xvlqj#fulwhuld#lpso|lqj#txdqwlwdwlyh#+vxfk#dv#prgho#|hdu/#wkh#glvwdqfh#wudyhohg#wr#gdwh/#sulfh/#ixho#frqvxpswlrq/#wuxqn#vl}h/#hqjlqh#srzhu/#shuirupdqfh#hwf1,#dqg#txdolwdwlyh#+vxfk#dv#ixho#v|vwhp/#wudqvplvvlrq#w|sh/#froru/#hwf1,#ihdwxuhv1#Lq#wkh#fxuuhqw#vwxg|/#HOHFWUH#dqg#JUD#+Jud|#Uhodwlrqdo#Dqdo|vlv,#pxowl0fulwhuld#phwkrgv#kdyh#ehhq#xvhg#iru#fdu0sxufkdvlqj#ghflvlrq1#Dv#d#uhvxow/#wkh#phwkrgv#surgxfhg#gliihuhqw#frqfoxvlrq1#Wkh#ghflvlrq0pdnhu#vkrxog#ghyhors#dfwlrq#zlwk#wkh#dzduhqhvv#ri#zklfk#fulwhuld#kdyh#pxfk#pruh#lpsruwdqw#iru#klpvhoi#dqg#kh#vkrxog#pdnh#klv#fkrlfh#dffruglqjo|1#Q-ywyd"%,_ ˢ"w"

Anahtar Kelimeler

• O.%-"/ |"- |"c,P ","yx,Oc$"x .,Q% -| .,S|",T %c-"yxc%,Mxc%2,"

EN UYGUN OTOMOBİLİN GRİ İLİŞKİSEL ANALİZ VE ELECTRE YÖNTEMLERİ İLE SEÇİMİ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme, Electre, Gri İlişkisel Analiz, Otomobil Seçimi

Kaynakça

1. 1. ATICI, Ka3ım Barış ve A2dın Ulucan, (2009), LEnerji Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sþrecinde €ok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımları ve Tþrki2e U2gulamalarıM, E^`bqqbmbÝkfsbopfqbpfİhqfp^afsbİa^of?fifjibo C^hüiqbpfAbodfpf, Cilt 27, Sa2ı 1, s.161O186.
2. 2. BALLI, Serkan, Bahadır Karasulu ve Serdar KĀrþkoğlu, (2007), LEn U2gun Otomobil Se imi Problemi i in Bir Bulanık Promethee YĀntemi U2gulamasıM, AlhrwBviüiÝkfsbopfqbpfİ.İ+?+C+Abodfpf, Cilt 22, Sa2 1, s.139O147.
3. 3. BAYSAL, GĀk e ve Vahap Tecim, (2006), LKatı Atık Depolama Sahası U2gunluk Anali3inin Coğrafi BĀlge Sistemler (CBS) Tabanlı €ok Kriterli Karar YĀntemleri2le U2gulamasıM, C^qfeÝkfsbopfqbpf@lğo^cf ?fidfPfpqbjibof?fifşfjDükibof, İstanbul.
4. 4. BRANS, Jean-Pierre ve Bruna Mareschal, (1998), EltQlAb`fabTfqe Moljbqebb, Visual Decision Inc. Montreal, Canada, .
5. 5. CHAN, Joseph ve Thomas Tong, (2007) LMulti-criteria Material Selections and-of-life Product Strateg2: Dobv Obi^qflk^i >k^ivpfp >mmol^`e‘)J^qbof^ip^kaAbpfdk, Cilt 28, Sa2ı 5, s.1539O1546.
6. 6. DENG, Julong L. (1989) ,LIntroduction to Gre2 S2stemM, QebGlrok^ilc DobvPvpqbj, Cilt 1 Sa2ı 1, s.1O24.
7. 7. ERTUĞRUL, İrfan ve Nilsen Karakaşoğlu, (2010), LElectre ve Bulanık AHP YĀntemleri ile Bir İşletme İ in Bilgisa2ar Se imiM, AlhrwBviüi Ýkfsbopfqbpfİhqfp^afsbİa^of?fifjiboC^hüiqbpfAbodfpf, Cilt 25 Sa2ı 2, s.23O41.
8. 8. FENG, Cheng-Min ve Rong-Tsu Wang, (2000), LPerformance Evaluation for Airlines Including the Consideration of Financial RatiosM, Glrok^ilc>foQo^kpmloqJ^k^dbjbkq, Cilt 6, Sa2ı 3, s.133O142.

9. 9. G•NGR, İbrahim ve Didar Bþ2þker İşler, (2005), LAnalitik Hi2erarşi Yaklaşımı ile Otomobil Se imiM, Wlkdria^hH^o^Bij^pÝkfsbopfqbpf Plpv^i?fifjiboAbodfpf, Cilt 1 Sa2ı 2, s.21O33.
10. 10. KARACASU, Murat, (2007), LKenti i Toplu Taşıma Yatırımlarının Değerlendirilmesinde Karar Destek Modeli (Electre YĀntemi) KullanımıM, 4+Ri^ştıoj^Hlkdobpf)İstanbul.
11. 11. ZDEMİR, Ali İhsan ve Mustafa Deste, (2009), LGri İlişkisel Anali3 ile €ok Kriterli Tedarik i Se imiM, İpq^k_riÝkfsbopfqbpfİşibqjbC^hüiqbpf Abodfpf, Cilt 38 Sa2ı 2, s.147O156.
12. 12. PEKER, İskender ve Birdoğan Baki, (2011), LGri İlişkisel Anali3 YĀntemi ile Tþrk Sigortacılık SektĀrþnde Performans l þmþM, Rirpi^o^o^pıfhqfp^afsbİa^ofİk`bibjbiboAbodfpf)Cilt 4, Sa2ı 7, s.1O17
13. 13. SONER, Selin ve Semih nþt, (2006), L€ok Kriterli Tedarik i Se imi: Bir Electre-Ahp U2gulamasıM, Glrok^ilcBkdfkbbofkd^kaK^qro^i P`fbk`bp*Pfdj^, Cilt 4, s.110O120
14. 14. TERZİ, •mit, Sinan Emre Hacaloğlu, ve Zerrin Aladağ, (2006), LOtomobil Satın Alma Problemi i in Bir Karar Destek ModeliM, İpq^k_ri Qf`^obqÝkfsbopfqbpfCbk?fifjibofAbodfpf, Cilt 5 Sa2ı 10, s.43O49.
15. 15. •ST•NIŞIK, N.Z. (2007) Qüohfvb$abhfİiibosb?öidbibo?^wıka^Plpvl* BhlkljfhDbifşjfşifhPıo^i^j^pı>o^ştıoj^pı7DofFifşhfpbi>k^ifw VökqbjfsbRvdri^j^pı) Yþksek Lisans Te3i, Ga3i •niversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitþsþ, Ankara
16. 16. YOUSEFİ, Ali ve Abdollah Hadi Vencheh, (2010), LAn Integrated Group Decision Making Model an Its Evaluation b2 DEA for Automobile Industr2‘)BumboqPvpqbjpTfqe>mmif`^qflkp, Cilt 37, Sa2ı 12, s.8543O8556.
17. 17. Yuan, Xiong. (2007), LGre2 Relation Evaluation of Financial Situation of Listed Compan2M, Glrok^ilcJlabok>``lrkqfkd^ka>rafqfkd, Cilt 3, Sa2ı 2,s. 41O44.
18. 18. ZHAİ, Lian-2ing, Li-Pheng Khoo, ve Zhao-Wei Zhong, (2009), LDesign Concept Evaluation in Product Devolopment Using Rough Sets and Gre2 Relation Anal2sisM, BumboqPvpqbjtfqe>mmif`^qflkp, Cilt 36, Sa2ı 3, s.7072O7079.