Örgütsel Alanda Meşruiyet Kavramının Açılımı: Kurumsal ve Stratejik Meşruiyet

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

ÖRGÜTSEL ALANDA MEŞRUİYET KAVRAMININ AÇILIMI: KURUMSAL VE STRATEJİK MEŞRUİYET

Öz

Bu çalışma, meşruiyet kavramını örgütsel alanda değerlendirmek üzere örgüt yazınındaki meşruiyet yaklaşımlarını tartışmaktadır. Çalışmada ki temel tartışma örgüt yazınında ‘meşruiyet’ kavramına yüklenen anlamlar ve bu anlamların örgütler için taşıdığı önemdir. Çalışmada örgüt yazını içinde sınıflandırılmış ve sınıflandırma sonucunda hangi meşruiyet tipinin örgütler için önceliğe sahip olabileceği tartışılmıştır. Bu çalışma makro bir perspektifle, ampirik olarak çalışılması çok güç olan meşruiyet kavramını örgütler açısından taşıdığı anlamlar itibariyle sorgulamaya çalışmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• örgüt teorisi, meşruiyet, kurumsal

Kaynakça

1. 1. Ashforth, B.E. ve Gibbs, B.W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organizational Science, 1:177-194.
2. 2. Brown, A.D. 1997. Narcissism, identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22:643-686.
3. 3. Dacin, M.T. 1997. Isomorphism in Context: The Power and Prescription of Institutional Norms. Academy of Managememt Journal, 40(1): 48-81.
4. 4. Deegan, C. 2002. Introduction-the legitimising effect of social and enviromental disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3): 282-311.
5. 5. Deephouse, D.L. ve Carter, S.M. 2005. An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42:229-360.
6. 6. DiMaggio, P.J. ve Powell, W.W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1991, University of Chicago Pres, Chicago:63-82.
7. 7. Dowling, J. ve Pfeffer, J. 1975. Organizational Legitimacy: social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1): 122- 126.
8. 8. Elsbach, K.D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39:57-88.

9. 9. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. ve Lavers, S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting-a review of the literature and longitudial study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(2):47-77.
10. 10. Jepperson, R.L. 1991. Institıtions, Institutinal Effects, and Institutionalism. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Pres, Chicago:143-163.
11. 11. Meyer, J.W. ve Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83:440-463.
12. 12. Meyer, J.W. ve Rowan, B. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W.W. Powell & P.J. DiMaggio (Der), The new intitutionalism in organizational analysis: 41-62. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. 13. Meyer, J.W. ve Scott, W.R. 1983. Organizational EnvironmentsRituals and Rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills-CA.
14. 14. Parson, T. 1956. Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations-I-II. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1: 63-85, 223-239.
15. 15. Pfeffer, J., ve Salancik, G.R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper ve Row Yayınları. New York.
16. 16. Pfeffer, J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintanence of organizational paradigms. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw.
17. 17. Ruef, W.W. ve Scott, W.R. 1998. A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43:877-904.
18. 18. Scott, W.R., 1991, ‘Unpacking Institutional Arguments’, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Pres, Chicago:164-182.
19. 19. Suchman, M.C., 1995, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, Academy of Management Review, 20:571- 610.
20. 20. Woodward, D.G., Edwards, P ve Bikrin, F. 1996. Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision. British Journal of Management, 17:329-347.
21. 21. Ullman, A.A. 1985. Data search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and academic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10 (3):540-547.
22. 22. Zucker, Lynee, G., 1987, ‘Institutional Theories of Organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13:443-464.