ENERJİ TÜKETİMİNDE KÜRESELLEŞMENİN ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışma Türkiye için 1970-2015 aralığında küreselleşme alt başlıklarının, kişi başına düşen gayri safi yurt içi hasılanın ve şehirde yaşayan nüfusun, kişi başına enerji kullanımına uzun dönemli etkilerini araştırmaktır. Uzun dönem katsayıları tahmin etmek için DOLS tahmin yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre her üç modelde de kişi başına gayri safi yurtiçi hasılanın kişi başına enerji talebine etkisi pozitif bulunmuştur. Kişi başına düşen gayri safi yurtiçi hasıladaki %1 birimlik artış, kişi başına enerji talebini %0.6 arttırmaktadır. Aynı şekilde şehirde yaşayan nüfusun, kişi başına düşen enerji tüketimine etkisi her üç modelde de pozitif bulunmuş ve şehirde yaşayan nüfustaki %1’lik artış, kişi başına enerji tüketimini %0.1 arttırmaktadır. Küreselleşme alt başlıklarının, kişi başına enerji tüketimine etkisi ise modeller arasında farklılık göstermektedir. Ekonomik ve politik küreselleşmenin kişi başına enerji talebine etkisi pozitif olurken, sosyal küreselleşmenin negatif olmaktadır. Ekonomik ve politik küreselleşmedeki %1 birimlik artış, kişi başına enerji tüketimini sırasıyla %0.13 ve %0.08 arttırırken; sosyal küreselleşmedeki %1 birimlik artış %0.04 azaltmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küreselleşme,Bayer-Hanck Eş Bütünleşme,Enerji Tüketimi

THE ROLE OF GLOBALIZATION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Öz

This study investigates the long-term effects of globalization proxies such as the gross domestic product per capita and the urban population on energy use per capita for Turkey between the period 1970-2015. DOLS estimation method is utilized to estimate the long-term coefficients. According to the estimation results, the impact of the GDP per capita on energy demand per capita is found to be positive in all three models. The 1% increase in gross domestic product per capita increases the energy demand per capita by 0.6%. Similarly, the effect of urban population on energy consumption per capita is found to be positive in all three models, and a 1% increase in urban population increases the energy consumption per capita by 0.1%. The effect of globalization proxies on energy consumption per capita varies between models. While both economic and political globalization positively affect energy demand per capita, social globalization has an adverse impact. A 1% rise in both economic and political globalization increase energy consumption per capita by 0.13% and 0.08%, respectively; however, it is reduced by 0.04% due to a 1% rise in social globalization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Globalization,Bayer-Hanck Cointegration,Energy Consumption

Kaynakça

1. ALPER, F.Ö. & ALPER, A.E. (2017). “Karbondioksit Emisyonu, Ekonomik Büyüme, Enerji Tüketimi İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Bir ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, Sosyoekonomi, 25(33), 145-156.
2. AL-MULALI, U., & ÖZTURK, I. (2015). “The Effect Of Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Trade Openness, Industrial Output, and The Political Stability On The Environmental Degradation in The Mena (Middle East And North African) Region”, Energy, 84, 382-389.
3. ANTWEILER, W., COPELAND, B. R., & TAYLOR, M. S. (2001). “Is free trade good for the environment?”, American Economic Review, 91(4), 877-908.
4. ATASOY, B. S. (2017). “Testing The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Across The US: Evidence From Panel Mean Group Estimators”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 731-747.
5. AZAM, M., & KHAN, A. Q. (2016). “Testing The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Comparative Empirical Study For Low, Lower Middle, Upper Middle And High Income Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 556-567.
6. BANERJEE, A., DOLADO, J., & MESTRE, R. (1998). “Error‐Correction Mechanism Tests For Cointegration in A Single‐Equation Framework”, Journal Of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
7. BAYER, C., & HANCK, C. (2013). “Combining Non‐Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83-95.
8. BECKER, R., ENDERS, W., & LEE, J. (2006). “A Stationarity Test in The Presence Of An Unknown Number Of Smooth Breaks”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.

9. BİLGİLİ, F., KOÇAK, E., & BULUT, Ü. (2016). “The Dynamic Impact of Renewable Energy Consumption on CO2 Emissions: A Revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845.
10. BOSWIJK, H. P. (1994). “Testing for an Unstable Root in Conditional And Structural Error Correction Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 63(1), 37-60.
11. COPELAND, B. R., & TAYLOR, M. S. (2004). “Trade, Growth, and The Environment”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71.
12. CHANG, S. C. (2015), “Effects of Financial Developments And Income on Energy Consumption”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 35, 28-44.
13. CLARK, W. C. (2000). “Governance in Globalizing World”, Brooking Institute Press, 86-108.
14. DREHER, A. (2006). “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence From A aNew Index of Globalization”, Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
15. ELLIOTT, G., JANSSON, M., & PESAVENTO, E. (2005). “Optimal Power For Testing Potential Cointegrating Vectors With Known Parameters For Nonstationarity”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23(1), 34-48.
16. ENGLE, R. F., & GRANGER, C. W. (1987). “Co-İntegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, And Testing”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
17. FARHANI, S., SHAHBAZ, M., & ÖZTURK, I. (2014). “Coal consumption, industrial production and CO2 emissions in China and India”, Ipag Business School Working Paper Series (No. 2014-225).
18. FURUOKA, F. (2015). “Financial Development and Energy Consumption: Evidence From A Heterogeneous Panel Of Asian Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 430-444.
19. GOLDTHAU, A. & BOERSMA, T. (2014). “The 2014 Ukraine-Russia Crisis: Implications for Energy Markets and Scholarships”, Energy Research &Social Science, 3, 13-15.
20. GOVINDARAJU, V. C., & TANG, C. F. (2013). “The Dynamic Links Between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Coal Consumption in China And India”, Applied Energy, 104, 310-318.
21. GYGLI, S.; HAELG, F. & STURM, J.E. (2018). “The KOF Globalization Index- Revisited”, KOF Working Paper No: 439.
22. ISLAM, F., SHAHBAZ, M., AHMED, A. U., & ALAM, M. M. (2013)” Financial Development And Energy Consumption Nexus in Malaysia: A Multivariate Time Series Analysis”, Economic Modelling, 30, 435-441.
23. IŞIK, C.; DOĞRU, T. & TÜRK, E. S. (2017). “A Nexus of Linear and Non-Linear Relationships Between Tourism Demand, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence”, Wiley Research Article, DOI: 10.1002/jtr.2151.
24. JEBLI, M. B., YOUSSEF, S. B., & ÖZTURK, I. (2016). “Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: The Role Of Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade in OECD Countries”, Ecological Indicators, 60, 824-831.
25. JOHANSEN, S. (1988). “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
26. KOMAL, R., & ABBAS, F. (2015). “Linking Financial Development, Economic Growth and Energy Consumption in Pakistan”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 211-220.
27. KRISTJANPOLLER, R. W.; SİERRA, A. C. & SCAVİA J. D. (2018), “Dynamic Co-Movements Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Panel Data and Wavelet Perspective”, Energy Economics, 72, 640-649.
28. LEE, J., & STRAZICICH, M. (2003). “Minimum LM Unitroot Test with Two Structural Breaks”, Department of Economics, University of Central Florida Working Paper Series.
29. LEITAO, N. C. (2013). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Globalization: The Empirical Evidence For Portugal, Spain, Greece And Ireland”. Energy Economics Letters, 1(1), 15-23.
30. LUMSDAINE, R. L., & PAPELL, D. H. (1997). “Multiple Trend Breaks and The Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212-218.
31. MARTENS, P., CASELLİ, M., DE LOMBAERDE, P., FİGGE, L., & SCHOLTE, J. A. (2015). “New Directions in Globalization Indices”, Globalizations, 12(2), 217-228.
32. MASIH, A. M., & MASIH, R. (1996). “Energy Consumption, Real Income And Temporal Causality: Results From A Multi-Country Study Based on Cointegration And Error-Correction Modelling Techniques”, Energy Economics, 18(3), 165-183.
33. MBAREK, V.D.; SAIDI, K. & RAHMAN, M. M. (2018). “Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption, Environmental Degradation and Economic Growth in Tunusia”, Qual Quant, 52, 1105-1119.
34. MENEGAKI, A. N., & ÖZTURK, I. (2013), “Growth And Energy Nexus in Europe Revisited: Evidence From A Fixed Effects Political Economy Model”. Energy Policy, 61, 881-887.
35. NORRIS, P. (2000). “Governance in Globalizing World”, Brooking Institute Press, 155-177.
36. OVERLAND, I. (2016). “Energy: The Missing Link in Globalization”, Energy Research &Social Science, 14, 122-130.
37. OUYANG, Y. & LI, P. (2018). “On The Nexus of Financial Development, Economic Growth, and Energy Consumption in China: A New Perspective From A GMM Panel VAR Approach”, Energy Economics, 71, 238-252.
38. ÖZOKÇU, S., & ÖZDEMİR, Ö. (2017). “Economic Growth, Energy, and Environmental Kuznets Curve”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647.
39. PERRON, P. (1989). “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, And The Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1361-1401.
40. SADORSKY, P. (2011), “Financial Development and Energy Consumption in Central and Eastern European Frontier Economies”. Energy Policy, 39(2), 999-1006.
41. SHAHBAZ, M., LAHIANI, A.; ABOSEDRA, S. & HAMMOUDEH, S. (2018). “The Role of Globalization in Energy Consumption. A Quantile Cointegrating Regression Aprroach”, Energy Economics, 71, 161-170.
42. SHAHBAZ, M., VAN HOANG, T. H., MAHALIK, M. K., & ROUBAUD, D. (2017). “Energy Consumption, Financial Development and Economic Growth in India: New Evidence From A Nonlinear And Asymmetric Analysis”, Energy Economics, 63, 199-212.
43. SHAHBAZ, M., MALLICK, H., MAHALIK, M. K., & SADORSKY, P. (2016). “The Role Of Globalization on The Recent Evolution of Energy Demand in India: Implications For Sustainable Development”, Energy Economics, 55, 52-68.
44. SHAHBAZ, M., MALLICK, H., MAHALIK, M. K., & LOGANATHAN, N. (2015). “Does Globalization Impede Environmental Quality in India?”, Ecological Indicators, 52, 379-393.
45. SHAHBAZ, M., NASREEN, S., LİNG, C. H., & SBİA, R. (2014). “Causality Between Trade Openness and Energy Consumption: What Causes What in High, Middle And Low Income Countries”, Energy Policy, 70, 126-143.
46. SHAHBAZ, M., & LEAN, H. H. (2012), “Does Financial Development Increase Energy Consumption? The Role Of Industrialization And Urbanization in Tunisia”, Energy policy, 40, 473-479.
47. STOCK, J. H., & WATSON, M. W. (1993). “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 783-820.
48. ZIAEI, S. M. (2015). ”Effects of Financial Development Indicators on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission Of European, East Asian And Oceania Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 752-759.
49. ZIVOT, E., & ANDREWS, D. W. K. (1992). “Further Evidence on The Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and The Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25-44.
50. Thomson Reuters Web of Science, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/Search.do?product=WOS&SID=C4DxdYC9RYfz3ALiIk1&search_mode=GeneralSearch&prID=d35d64e3-0a29-4407-9508-eeda6fc1054c