Views On Turkish Accession In The European Parliament: A Comparative Analysis

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 101 - 117, 01.06.2013

  Yrd.doç.dr.abdullah Yuvacı

Öz

Utilizing data from European Parliament Research Group’s ‘Members of European Parliament (MEPs) Survey,’ conducted by David Farrell and his colleagues in 2006 and 2010, this article analyzes to what extent MEPs are supportive of Turkey’s EU accession and how their support shows variances across their national and European party group affiliations. In addition, by comparing MEPs’ opinion on Turkish accession to their opinion on the accession of Croatia, Macedonia and Bosnia, the study seeks to understand whether Turkey is viewed differently by MEPs and to what extent it is perceived as a “category of its own” in the EP. The study finds that although some national and ideological affiliations of MEPs are associated with their attitudes toward Turkey, MEPs don’t display a strong level of cohesion across nationality and ideology in their views of Turkish accession. Moreover, the study demonstrates that most MEPs are against Turkey’s EU membership and Turkey is indeed viewed differently in the EP

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

AVRUPA PARLAMENTOSU’NDA TÜRKİYE’NİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ KATILIMINA YÖNELİK BAKIŞ AÇILARI: KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Bu makale, Avrupa Parlamentosu (AP) Araştırma Grubu’nun, David Farrell ve arkadaşlarının 2006 ve 2010’da uyguladığı ‘Avrupa Parlamentosu Üyeleri Anketi’ni kullanarak, AB parlamenterlerinin Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği (AB) üyeliğini ne derece desteklediklerini ve parlamenterlerin Türkiye’ye destek oranlarının milli ve ideolojik bağıntılara göre nasıl farklılıklar arz ettiğini irdelemektedir. Ayrıca, bu çalışma, AB parlamenterlerinin Türkiye’ye sunduğu desteği, Hırvatistan, Makedonya ve Bosna üyeliklerine sunulan destek oranları ile karşılaştırarak, Türkiye’nin ne derece farklı olarak görüldüğünü de incelemektedir. Çalışma, her ne kadar bazı milli ve ideolojik bağıntıların parlamenterlerin Türkiye tutumları ile ilişkili olduğunu gösterse de, Avrupa Parlamentosu vekillerinin milli ve ideolojik açıdan Türkiye tutumlarında güçlü bir tutarlılık sergilemediklerini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bu makale, parlamenterlerin büyük bir kısmının Türkiye’nin AB üyeliğine karşı olduğunu ve Türkiye’nin gerçekten de farklı bir kategoride değerlendirildiğini de ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği ilişkileri, Avrupa Parlamentosu, Avrupa Parti Grupları, Avrupa Parlamentosu üyeleri, Avrupa Birliği genişlemesi

Kaynakça

• 1. ALMOND, Gabriel A., Russell J. Dalton and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. (2002),European Politics Today, Second Edition, Longman, New York.
• 2. ARCHICK, Kristin and Derek E. Mix (2011), “The European Parliament”, Current Economics and Politics of Europe, Vol.22, No.2, p.238-53.
• 3. AYDIN, Senem (2004), “Views of the European Parliament on Turkish Accession”, eds: Michael Emerson and Senem Aydın, CEPS Turkey in Europe Monitor, No. 4, p.29-35.
• 4. BAĞIŞ, Egemen (2011a), “European Parliament Report on Turkey: Criticizing itself with its Own Words’, Today’s Zaman, 23 March.
• 5. BAĞIŞ, Egemen (2011b), “State of Play in Turkish-EU Ties: Turkey Remains Firm on EU Path”, Turkish Review, 1 January.
• 6. BRAGHIROLI, Stefano (2012), “Je t'aime… moi non plus! An empirical assessment of Euro-parliamentarians' voting behavior on Turkey and Turkish membership”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 12, No.1, p.1-24.
• 7. de VREESE, Claes, Hajo G. Boomgaarden and Holi A. Semetko (2008), “Hard and Soft: Public Support for Turkish Membership in the EU”, European Union Politics, Vol. 9, No. 4, p.511-30.
• 8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2006), “Attitudes towards European Union Enlargement”, Special Eurobarometer, 255/Wave, 65.2, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/ archives/ebs/ebs_255_en.pdf, 3 April 2011.
• 9. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2007), “Professor Farrell: The EP is now one of the most powerful legislatures in the world”, REF.: 20070615IPR07837, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IMPRESS&reference=20070615IPR07 837, 9 July 2010.
• 10. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2005), “Parliament gives green light to Romania and Bulgaria”, Daily Notebook, April 13, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do;jsessionid=11136E25D407700FC6FB32A6BE5B1348.node 2?pubRef=//EP//TEXT+PRESS+DN-200504131+0+DOC+XML+V0// EN&language=EN#top, 9 July 2010.
• 11. FARRELL, David, Simon Hix and Roger Scully (2011), “EPRG MEP Survey Dataset: 2011 Release”, ,http://www2.lse.ac.uk/government /research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurveyData.aspx, 12 June 2012.
• 12. FARRELL, David, Simon Hix, Mark Johnson and Roger Scully (2006), “EPRG 2000 and 2006 MEP Surveys Dataset”, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EPRG/, 8 January 2010.
• 13. GERHARDS, Jürgen and Silke Hans (2011), “Why not Turkey? Attitudes towards Turkish Membership in the EU among Citizens in 27 European Countries”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 49, No. 4, p.741–66.
• 14. GINSBERG, Roy H. (2010), Demystifying the European Union: The Enduring Logic of Regional Integration, Second Edition, Rowman and Littfield Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
• 15. HIX, Simon, Roger Scully and David Farrell (2011), “National or European Parliamentarians? Evidence from a New Survey of the Members of the European Parliament”, http://www2.lse.ac.uk/ government/research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurveyData.aspx, 17 April 2013.
• 16. HIX, Simon and Abdul Noury (2009), “After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol.34, No.2, p.159-174.
• 17. HIX, Simon, Abdul Noury and Gerard Roland (2006), “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 2, p.494-511.
• 18. İÇENER, Erhan, David Phinnemore and Dimitris Papadimitriou (2010), “Continuity and Change in the European Union’s Approach to Enlargement: Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe Compared”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, p.207–23.
• 19. İÇENER, Erhan (2009), “Understanding Romania and Turkey’s Integrations with the European Union: Conditionality, Security Considerations and Identity”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 225-39.
• 20. KRAUSS, Stefan (2000), “The European Parliament in EU External Relations: The Customs Union with Turkey”, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol.5, p.215-237.
• 21. McLAREN, Lauren (2007), “Explaining Opposition to Turkish Membership of the EU”, European Union Politics, Vol. 8, No.2, p.251- 78.
• 22. NUGENT, Neill (2003), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Fifth Edition, Duke University Press, Durham.
• 23. ÖNİŞ, Ziya (2006), “Turkey’s Encounters with the New Europe: Multiple Transformations, Inherent Dilemmas and the Challanges Ahead”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol.8, No. 3, p. 280-297.
• 24. RASMUSSEN, Maja K.. (2008), “Another Side of the Story: A Qualitative Case Study of Voting Behaviour in the European Parliament”, Politics, Vol. 28, No. 1, p.11-18.
• 25. REDMOND, John (2007), “Turkey and the European Union: troubled European or European trouble?”, International Affairs, Vol.83, No. 2, p.305-17.
• 26. TSOUKALIS, Loukas (2006), “The JCMS Lecture: Managing diversity and change in the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, p.1-15.
• 27. VERNEY, Susannah (2007), “The Dynamics of EU Accession: Turkish Travails in Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol. 9, No. 3, p.307-22.
• 28. VIOLA, Donatella M. (2000), European Foreign Policy and the European Parliament in the 1990s: An investigation into the role and voting behaviour of the European Parliament’s political groups, Ashgate, Aldershot.
• 29. YILMAZ, Hakan, E. Erdogan and F. J. P. Esteban (2011), “European Perceptions of Turkey as a Future Member State: Results of an Opinion Poll in France, Germany, Poland, Spain and United Kingdom”, Project supported by a grant from the European Commission as part of the ‘Promotion of the Civil Society Dialogue between EU and Turkey’, CFCU-TR 0604.01/03, 19 November, http://www.buces.boun.edu.tr/dl/BUCES-AID-UAM-OpinionPollPresentation-English.pdf, 6 June 2012.
• 30. YILMAZ, Hakan (2007), “Turkish Identity on the Road to the EU: Basic Elements of French and German Oppositional Discourses”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol. 9, No. 3, p.293-305.
• 31. YUVACI, Abdullah (2013), “The Voting Behavior of the European Parliament Members on Turkish Accession: An analysis of the impact of member-state, European party groups and national party affiliations on a special status amendment vote for Turkey”, Turkish Studies, Vol.14, No. 3, forthcoming.
• 32. YUVACI, Abdullah (2012), “A Comparison of the 2006 and 2010 Members of the European Parliament Survey Results: A further polarization on the question of Turkey in the European Parliament?”, International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, Vol. 5, No.9, p.119-132.