Characteristics Of High Performance Organizations

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 155 - 174, 01.03.2010

  Yrd.doç.dr.bünyamin Akdemir Orhan Erdem Sedat Polat

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

YÜKSEK PERFORMANSLI ORGANİZASYONLARIN ÖZELLİKLERİ

Öz

Organizasyonlar (işletmeler), uzun yıllardır performans tanımlaması ve yönetimi ile başa çıkmaya çalışmaktadırlar. Literatürde yüksek performanslı organizasyonun birçok farklı tanımını bulmak mümkündür. Ancak halen kalıcı ve yeterli bir yüksek performanslı organizasyon tanımı bulmak oldukça zordur. Yüksek performanslı organizasyon tanımlarının farklılığı bilim insanlarının ilgi alanlarının farklılığı dolayısıyladır. Yüksek performanslı organizasyonların ideal ve etkin yapısı organizasyon alanı ve hedefine; öncelik, yeterlilik ve kültürüne bağlıdır. Bunların herbiri her organizasyon için vazgeçilmezdir. Tanımda da olduğu gibi yüksek performanslı organizasyonların özelliklerine yaklaşım, bilim
insanlarının bakış açılarına göre değişiklik gösterir. Bu durumu netleştirmek için, bu çalışma yüksek performanslı organizasyonlar için en çok onaylanan özellikleri vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Performans, Organizasyon, Yüksek Performans Organizasyonu, Yüksek Performans Kriterleri

Kaynakça

• Allen, R. S. & Helms, M. M. (2001). Reward practices and organizational performance. Compensation and Benefits Review, 33, 74-80.
• Bridges,W. (2003). Managing transitions: making the most of change.(2nd ed.). United States of America: Perseus Publishing.
• Buhler, P. M. (2003). Managing in the new millennium: understanding the manager's motivational tool bag. Supervision, 64, 20-23
• Buytaidijk F. (2006). The five keys to building a high-performance organization. Business Performance Management Magazine, 4, 24-30.
• Chalofsky, N. (2004). Meaningful job. Busines SourcePremier, 57, 52-58.
• Culyer, A. J. (2001). Equity: some theory and its policy implications.Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 275.
• Dresang, D. L. (1999). Public personnel management and public policy (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
• Erikson, E.O (2001). Leadership in a communicative perspective. Acta Sociologica, 44, 21-35.
• Fischman, W., Becca, S., Deborah, G., & Howard, G. (2004) Making Good, How Young People Cope with Moral Dilemmas at Work. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Gray, S. N. (2005). Tipping points: Building momentum for lasting change. Organizational Development Journal, 23, 71-77.
• Green, K. W. (2002). Just-in-time: Relation to market orientation, organizational structure and organizational performance. Louisinia Tech University, 1-134.
• Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A. (2003). Behavior in organizations (8th ed.) New Delhi: Prentice 13. Gupta, D. K. (2001). Analyzing public policy: Concepts, tools, and techniques. Washington D.C.: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.
• Hastings, S. (2004) Succession planning: Take two. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.
• Hillgren, J. & Morse, E. High performance organizations. Executive Excellence, 15, 9-10.
• Hodgetts, R. M., Kuratko, D. F. (1991). Management. (3th Edition). HBJ:New York
• Humphreys, L. W., & Humpreys, N. J. (1988). The proper use of discipline. Management Solutions, 33, 5-11.
• Ibarra, P. (2005, January-February). Succession planning: An idea whose time has come. Public Management, 87, 18-24.
• Jacobs, J. A. & Gerson, K. (2004). The Time Divide. Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Keskin, H. (2005). The relationships between explicit and tacit oriented knowledge management strategy, and firm performance. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7, 169-175.
• Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (1998). Organizational behavior (5th edition). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill
• Lin, Y., & Kleiner, B. H. (1999). How to hire employees effectively. Management Research News, 22, 18-25.
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Mathis, R. L. & Jackson, J. H. (2005). Human resource management: Essential perspectives (3rd ed.).Canada: South-Western.
• McCann, J. (2004). Organizational effectiveness: changing concepts for changing environments. Human Resource Planning, 27, 42-51.
• Milakovich, M. E., & Gordon, G. J. (2001). Public administration in America. Boston: Bedford: ST. Martin`s.
• Newcombe, T. (1999). Knowledge management: new wisdom or passing fad? Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/gt/94594.
• Nigro, L. G. & Nigro, F. A. (2000). The new public personnel administration (5th ed.). McNaughton & Gunn.
• Osborne, R.L. & Cowen, S. (2002). High-performance companies: The distinguishing profile. Management Decision, 40, 227-231.
• Parks, S. (1995). Improving workplace performance: Historical and theoretical contexts. Monthly Labor Review, 118, 18-28.
• Pennington, R.G. ( 2003). Change performance to change the culture.Industrial and Commercial Training, 35, 251-255.
• Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
• Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (1985). Managing organizational behavior, (2nd Ed.), New York
• Scully, J.P. (1995). How to lead the way to TQM. National Productivity Review, 14, 13.
• Shafritz, J. M., & Russell, E. W. (2002). Introducing public administration (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
• Thompson, R. (2004). Increase productivity, and morale and make work fun. Retrieved from http://www.robinthompson.com/makingworkfunhtm.
• Wade, J. (2004). Reducing the threat. Risk Management, 51, 10-16.
• West, R. L., & Thorn, R.M. (2001). Goal-setting, self-efficacy, and memory performance in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 27, 41-65.
• Williams, S. (1999). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on performance. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 183
• Wolf, M.F. (1993). Creating high performance teams. Research Technology Management, 36, 10-11.