Pre-service English Teachers' Reflections on the Use of E-mails and Blogs in Teaching Literature

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 10, 25.07.2014

Hilal Bozoğlan

Öz

Computer based applications have started to be so widely used all around the world that their effectiveness in language teaching also started to be questioned. However, despite the vast amount of literature on the use of these applications in language teaching, our knowledge about the reflections of the learners on the use of computer based applications in teaching the literature of the target language in a comparative way is highly limited. As a response to this gap in the literature, this study focused on the use of e-mails and blogs in teaching literature to pre-service language teachers comparatively. During the literature class, the students were asked to write an alternative ending to the two novels they have read using e-mails in the first time, and blogs in the second time. Later, through the questionnaire forms the students were asked to reflect upon the use of traditional paper-pen activities, e-mails and blogs in teaching literature. It was found out that the students favored e-mails and blogs compared to traditional activities. However, they also preferred blogs to e-mails. The students also reported that the use of e-mails and blogs in teaching literature was practical and motivating and it enhanced the communication among the students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Computer assisted language learning, Teaching literature, E-mails, Blogs

Kaynakça

• Abdelrahman, O. (2013). Use of dialogue through e-mail technology in developing writing skills to English as foreign language learners (EFL) at Al-Imam Mohammad Ben Saud Islamic University. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 14(4), 665-688.
• Anderson, R & Speck, B. (2001). Using technology in K-8 literacy classrooms. Upper Saddle River, N: J: Prentice Hall.
• Beauvois, M. (1998). Write to speak: the effects of electronic communication on the oral achievement of fourth semester French students. In J. A. Muyskens (Ed.), Newways of learning and teaching: focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 165-183). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
• Chapelle, A. C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chapelle, C. (2002). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Kaplan (ed.) The oxford handbook of applied linguistics, (pp 498-505), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cohen, S. (1996). E-mail basics. Training and Development, 50(8), 48-50.
• Darabi, R. (2006). Basic writing and learning communities, Journal of Basic Writing, 25(1), 53-72.
• Dieu, B. (2004). Blogs for language learning, Essential Teacher, 26-30.
• Fred, P. & Roberts, J. (1991, April). Penpals in science: Electronic mail, mentor teams, hands-on activities, small groups of children. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Spain.
• Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation
• with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 111-127.
• Gilmour, B. (2004). Summary Report of College English Pilot. Newcastle: University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
• Gonzalez-Bueno, M., & Perez, L.C. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: a study of grammatical and lexical accuracy, and quantity of language. Foreign Language Annals, 33(2), 189-197.
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Emerging technologies: Skype and podcasting: disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3), 9-12.
• Haworth, B. (1999). An analysis of the determinants of student e-mail use. Journal of Education for Business, 75(1), 55-59.
• Hegelheimer, V., & Tower, D (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32(2), 185-205.
• Ifeoma, O. (2010). Using computer-assisted language learning to improve students’ English language achievement in universal basic education. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 66-71.
• Izham, S. I. (2008). An analysis of the utilization of weblog as a tool in teaching critical reading skills among selected pre-university ESL students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. International Islamic University Malaysia.
• Kashani, H., Mahmud, R., & Kalajahi, S. (2013). Comparing the effect of blogging as well as pen-and paper on the essay writing performance of Iranian graduate students. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 202-2018.
• Lam, F. S., & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The computer vs the pen: A comparative study of word processing in a
• Hong Kong secondary classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(1), 75-92.
• Lindenau, S.E. (1984). The teacher and technology in the humanities and arts. Modern Language Journal, 68(2), 119-124.
• Little, D. (1997). Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: theoretical foundations and some essentials of pedagogical practice. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 8(2), 227-44.
• McIntosh, E. (2005). From learning logs to learning blogs. Scottish Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, Retrieved on January, 20, 2014 from http://www.scilt.org.uk/Portals/24/Library/slr/issues/13/SLR13_McIntosh.pdf
• McLester, S. (2001). Top 10 technology breakthroughs for schools. Technology and Learning,18-28.
• Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Nadzrah, A.B. (2007). Using blog to develop interests among ESL students: A new paradigm in language education, Paper presented at Asia TEFL.
• Nadzrah, A.B., Kemboja, I. (2009). Using blogs to encourage ESL students to write constructively in English, AJTLHE, 1(5), 45-57.
• Nardi, B. Schiano, D. Gumbrecht, M. , Schwartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41-46.
• Patrikis, P. (1995). Where is computer technology taking us. ADFL Bulletin, 26(2), 36-39.
• Pennington, M. (2003). The impact of the computer in second language writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 287-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rankin, W. (1997). Increasing the communicative competence of foreign language students through the FL chatroom. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 542-546.
• Rüschoff, B. and D. Wolff (1999). Fremdsprachenlernen in der Wissensgesellschaft. Munich: Hueber.
• Sabieh, C. (2002). The influence of e-mail on language learning: A positive impact. Paper Presented at the Annual Center for Developing English Language Teaching, Cairo, Egypt.
• Stanford, P. & Siders, J. (2001). E-pal writing! Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 21-25.
• Stanley, G. (2006). Blog-EFL: Observations and comments on the use of weblogs, emerging technologies & e-learning tools for English language teaching. Retrieved on March, 15, 2012 from http://blog-efl.blogspot.com.
• Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning and Technology, 165-180.
• Supyan, H., Norizan, A. R., Dalia, S. Q. (2010). Developing blogs: New dimension in language teacher education. Paper presented at Teaching and Learning of English in Asia, November 18-20, Brunei, Darussalam.
• Wang, Y. M. (1994). E-mail dialogue journaling in an ESL reading and writing classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 3316.
• Wallace, M. & Wingate, P. (2001). An Introduction to E-mail. London: Usborne Publishing.
• Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
• Watson, J. & Wright, V. (2005). Re-usable online learning materials: pipe-dream or reality? Paper presented at BALEAP Conference, Edinburgh, UK.
• Zare-ee, A., Shekarey, A., & Vajargah, K. F. (2009). The educational usefulness and use of blogging in higher education: male and female Iranian undergraduate students' views. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7(2), 211-219.