TR
EN
Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Öz
Objective: The study was planned to evaluate patients with chronic cervical myofascial pain syndrome treated with lidocane injection and exercise and to compare the efficacy of treatments.
Material and Method: The study included 73 patients (40 females, 33 males) aged between 25 and 65 years, who had been treated with exercise and lidocane injection due to the diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome in our clinic 6 months ago, and volunteered to participate in the study. The mean age of the participants in the exercise group (n=38) was 44.16±10.63 years. The age of the participants in the lidokayn injection group (n=35) was 42.20±11.63 years. The exercise group was given stretching exercises for the neck and upper back muscles, and strengthening exercises for the neck muscles, 3 sets of 10 times a day. On the other hand, to the Lidokayn injection group participating in the study, 2 ml of 1% lidocaine was applied locally to the trigger points according to the injection technique defined by Travell and Simons. Patients' pain Visual Analogue Scale. pressure pain threshold Algometer, muscle spasm Palpable Muscle Spasm Scoring, cervical normal joint movement (CROM), disability level Neck Disability Scale, depression status Beck Depression Scale, anxiety status Beck Anxiety Inventory and quality of life SF-36 Short Form-36 scales. . Statistical significance level is (p<0.05).
Results: The results of lidocaine ejection and exercise are similar in the treatment of MAS. We think that exercise therapy is more feasible in the treatment of MAS because it is non-invasive, easily applicable and more economical.
Material and Method: The study included 73 patients (40 females, 33 males) aged between 25 and 65 years, who had been treated with exercise and lidocane injection due to the diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome in our clinic 6 months ago, and volunteered to participate in the study. The mean age of the participants in the exercise group (n=38) was 44.16±10.63 years. The age of the participants in the lidokayn injection group (n=35) was 42.20±11.63 years. The exercise group was given stretching exercises for the neck and upper back muscles, and strengthening exercises for the neck muscles, 3 sets of 10 times a day. On the other hand, to the Lidokayn injection group participating in the study, 2 ml of 1% lidocaine was applied locally to the trigger points according to the injection technique defined by Travell and Simons. Patients' pain Visual Analogue Scale. pressure pain threshold Algometer, muscle spasm Palpable Muscle Spasm Scoring, cervical normal joint movement (CROM), disability level Neck Disability Scale, depression status Beck Depression Scale, anxiety status Beck Anxiety Inventory and quality of life SF-36 Short Form-36 scales. . Statistical significance level is (p<0.05).
Results: The results of lidocaine ejection and exercise are similar in the treatment of MAS. We think that exercise therapy is more feasible in the treatment of MAS because it is non-invasive, easily applicable and more economical.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
pamukkale üniversitesi bilimsel araştırmalar projeler
Proje Numarası
2015SBE004
Teşekkür
This research was supported by Pamukkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship with project number 2015SBE004.
Kaynakça
- [1] Graff-Radford SB. Myofascial pain: diagnosis and management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8(6):463–67.
- [2] Chiarotto, A., Clijsen, R., Fernandez-de-las-Penas, C., & Barbero, M. Prevalence of myofascial trigger points in spinal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2016; 97(2):316-37.
- [3] Delgado, E.V., Romero, J.C., Escoda, G.E. Myofascial pain syndrome associated with trigger points: A literature review. (I): Epidemiology, clinical treatment and etiopathogeny. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2009;14(10): 494-8.
- [4] Kietrys DM, Palombaro KM, Azzaretto E, Hubler R, Schaller B, Schlussel JM, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain: a systematic review and me ta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(9):620–34.
- [5] Rodríguez-Mansilla, Juan, et al.Effectiveness of dry needling on reducing pain intensity in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a Meta-analysis. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2016; 36.1: 1-13.
- [6] Travell, J.G., Simons, D.G. Travell & Simons' Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction The Trigger Point Manual Volume 1. Upper Half of Body. Williams & Wilkins, USA. 1999. 1038s.
- [7] Liu , Lin, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2015;96.5: 944-955.
- [8] Cheshire, William P.; Abashıan, Sandra W.; Mann, J. Douglas. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Pain. 1994; 59.1: 65-9.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
20 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
10 Ekim 2022
Kabul Tarihi
16 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3
APA
Çavdar, H. Ç., Büker, N., & Samut, G. (2022). Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(3), 531-539. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1184789
AMA
1.Çavdar HÇ, Büker N, Samut G. Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;13(3):531-539. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1184789
Chicago
Çavdar, Handan Çağlar, Nihal Büker, ve Gülbüz Samut. 2022. “Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 (3): 531-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1184789.
EndNote
Çavdar HÇ, Büker N, Samut G (01 Aralık 2022) Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13 3 531–539.
IEEE
[1]H. Ç. Çavdar, N. Büker, ve G. Samut, “Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 13, sy 3, ss. 531–539, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.22312/sdusbed.1184789.
ISNAD
Çavdar, Handan Çağlar - Büker, Nihal - Samut, Gülbüz. “Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 13/3 (01 Aralık 2022): 531-539. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1184789.
JAMA
1.Çavdar HÇ, Büker N, Samut G. Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;13:531–539.
MLA
Çavdar, Handan Çağlar, vd. “Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 13, sy 3, Aralık 2022, ss. 531-9, doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1184789.
Vancouver
1.Handan Çağlar Çavdar, Nihal Büker, Gülbüz Samut. Comparison of Local Anesthetic Injection and Exercise Therapy Results in Patients with Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2022;13(3):531-9. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1184789
